Argumentation context systems: A framework for abstract group argumentation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5753 LNAI, Issue , 2009, Pages 44-57

  Brewka, Gerhard ^a   Eiter, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION; ABSTRACT ARGUMENTS; ABSTRACT GROUPS; ARGUMENT SYSTEMS; LEGAL REASONING; MODEL GROUPS; MODULAR FRAMEWORK;

LOGIC PROGRAMMING;

ABSTRACTING;

EID: 70349883940     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation. In: Proc. Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 1998, pp. 1-7 (1998)
2. Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Value-based argumentation frameworks. In: Proc. 9th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, NMR 2002, Toulouse, France, pp. 443-454 (2002)
3. Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 13(3), 429-448 (2003)
4. Binas, A., McIlraith, S.: Peer-to-peer query answering with inconsistent knowledge. In: Proc. 11th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2008, Sydney, Australia, pp. 329-339 (2008)
5. Brewka, G.: Preferred subtheories: An extended logical framework for default reasoning. In: Proc. IJCAI 1989, pp. 1043-1048 (1989)
6. Brewka, G., Eiter, T.: Equilibria in heterogeneous nonmonotonic multi-context systems. In: Proc. AAAI 2007, pp. 385-390 (2007)
7. Caminada, M.: Semi-stable semantics. In: Proc. Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2006, pp. 121-130 (2006)
8. Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P., Amgoud, L.: Theoretical and computational properties of preference-based argumentation. In: Proc. ECAI 2008, Patras, Greece, pp. 463-467 (2008)
9. Dimopoulos, Y., Torres, A.: Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories. Theor. Comput. Sci. 170(1-2), 209-244 (1996)
10. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321-358 (1995)
11. Dung, P.M., Mancarella, P., Toni, F.: Computing ideal sceptical argumentation. Artif. Intell. 171(10-15), 642-674 (2007)
12. Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Coherence in finite argument systems. Artif. Intell. 141(1/2), 187-203 (2002)
13. García, A.J., Simari, G.R.: Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. TPLP 4(1-2), 95-138 (2004)
14. Giunchiglia, F., Sera.ni, L.: Multilanguage hierarchical logics, or: how we can do without modal logics. Artificial Intelligence 65(1), 29-70 (1994)
15. Modgil, S.: Hierarchical argumentation. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds.) JELIA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol.4160, pp. 319-332. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
16. Modgil, S.: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks. Artif. Intell. (2007) (to appear)
17. Roelofsen, F., Sera.ni, L.: Minimal and absent information in contexts. In: Proc. IJCAI 2005, pp. 558-563 (2005)
18. Thimm, M., Kern-Isberner, G.: A distributed argumentation framework using defeasible logic programming. In: Proc. Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2008, pp. 381-392 (2008)
19. Wiederhold, G.: Mediators in the architecture of future information systems. IEEE Computer 25(3), 38-49 (1992)
20. Wooldridge, M., McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: On the meta-logic of arguments. In: Proc. AAMAS 2005, pp. 560-567 (2005)
21. Wyner, A.Z., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Modelling judicial context in argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings COMMA 2008, pp. 417-428 (2008)