Authorship conflict in Bangladesh: An exploratory study

Learned Publishing

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 319-325

  Ahmed, Hasan Shareef ^a   Hadi, Abdullahel ^b   Choudhury, Nuzhat ^a  

^a RESEARCH AND EVALUATION DIVISION   (Bangladesh)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049306696     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/20100406     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication (updated October 2005). www.icmje.org (accessed 14 December 2005).
2. Bhopal, R., et al. 1997. The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. British Medical Journal, 314(7086): 1009-1012.
3. Hewitt, R.M. The physician-writer's book: tricks of the trade of medical writing. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders, 1957, p. 312.
4. Pignatelli, B., Maisonneuve, H. and Chapuis, F. 2005. Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31: 578-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.009449
5. Mowatt, G., Shirran, L., Grimshaw, J.M., et al. 2002. Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane reviews. Journal of American Medical Association, 287: 2769-2771.
6. Wagena, E.J. 2005.The scandal of unfair behaviour of senior faculty. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31: 308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.009308
7. Dhaliwal, U., Singh, N. and Bhatia, A. 2006. Awareness of authorship criteria and conflict: survey in a medical institution in India. Med Gen Med, www.medscape.com/viewarticle/547695_print (accessed 1 February 2010).
8. Wager, E. 2007. Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? Med Gen Med, 9(3): 16. www.ncbi.nlm.gov/pmc/articles/pmc/PMC22000 (accessed 1 February 2010).
9. Kakkar N. 2004. Authorship trends in the Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology: going the global way? (correspondence). Journal of Clinical Pathology, 57: 670.
10. Padron, G.J. and Costales, J.V. Peer review and the credibility of scientific biomedical journals of developing countries,' in Programme and Abstracts of the International Congress on Biomedical Peer Review and Global Communications, Prague, Czech Republic, 17-21 September 1997, p. 37 (abstract).
11. van Rooyen, S., Godlee, F., Evans, S., Smith, R. and Black, N. 1988. Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280: 234-237.
12. Yank, V. and Rennie, D. 1999. Disclosure of researcher contributions: a study of original research articles in The Lancet. Annals of Internal Medicine, 130(8): 661-670.
13. Wenhui, L., Shouchu, Q. and Yue, Q. Authorship of published medical papers in three Chinese medical journals. Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication (Abstract book). Chicago, Journal of the American Medical Association, 2001, pp. 29-30.
14. Raveendran R. 2004. Abuse of authorship. (Editorial). Indian Journal of Pharmacology [serial online], 36: 131-132. www.ijp-online.com/text.asp?2004/36/3/131/6864
15. Wilcox, L.J. 1998 Authorship: the coin of the realm, the source of complaints. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280: 216-217.
16. Goodman, N.W. 1994. Survey of fulfillment of criteria for authorship in published medical research. British Medical Journal, 309: 1482.
17. Shapiro, D.W., Wenger, N.S. and Shapiro, M.F. 1994. The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. Journal of the American Medical Association, 271: 438-442.