Awareness of authorship criteria and conflict: Survey in a medical institution in India

MedGenMed Medscape General Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2006, Pages

  Dhaliwal, Upreet ^a   Singh, Navjeevan ^a   Bhatia, Arati ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPETITION; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; HUMAN; INDIA; INTELLECT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PERSONALITY; PUBLISHING; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEACHING HOSPITAL; WRITING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUBLICATION; STANDARD; UNIVERSITY;

AUTHORSHIP; DATA COLLECTION; EDITORIAL POLICIES; FACULTY; HUMANS; INDIA; PERIODICALS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL;

EID: 33846033556     PISSN: 15310132     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Johns MM, Barnes M, Florencio PS. Restoring balance to industry-academia relationships in an era of institutional financial conflicts of interest: promoting research while maintaining trust. JAMA. 2003;289:741-746. Abstract
2. Klanica K. Conflicts of interest in medical research: how much conflict should exceed legal boundaries? J Biolaw Bus. 2005;8:37-45.
3. Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA. 2003;289:454-465. Abstract
4. Sahu DR, Abraham P. Authorship: rules, rights, responsibilities and recommendations. J Postgrad Med. 2000;46:205-210. Abstract
5. Grieger MCA. Authorship: an ethical dilemma of science. Sao Paulo Med J. 2005;123:242-246. Abstract
6. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. JAMA. 1997;277:927-934. Abstract
7. Bhopal R, Rankin J, McColl E, et al. The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty. BMJ. 1997;314:1009-1012. Abstract
8. American Association of Public Opinion Research: Outcome rate calculator, version 2.1. Available at http://www.aapor.org/rrc.asp. Accessed November 17, 2006.
9. Smith J. Gift authorship: a poisoned chalice? BMJ. 1994;309:1456-1457.
10. Hren D, Sambunjak D, Marusic M, Marusic A. How intuitive are ICMJE criteria for authorship? Perceptions of deserved authorship among medical students and physicians. Presented at the Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication; September 16-18, 2005; Chicago, Illinois, USA. Available at http://www.bmjresearch.com/ publications/pdf/congress_prog.pdf. Accessed November 17, 2006.
11. Pignatelli B, Maisonneuve H, Chapuis F. Authorship ignorance: views of researchers in French clinical settings. J Med Ethics. 2005;31:578-581. Abstract
12. Tarnow E, De Young BR, Cohen MB. Coauthorship in pathology, a comparison with physics and a survey-generated and member-preferred authorship guideline. MedGenMed. 2004;6:1-2.
13. Huth EJ. Guidelines on authorship of medical papers. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:269-274. Abstract
14. Wagena EJ. The scandal of unfair behavior of senior faculty. J Med Ethics. 2005;31:308.
15. Marco CA. Who wrote this paper? Basics of authorship and ethical issues. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:76-77. Abstract
16. Katavic V. Five-year report of Croatian Medical Journal's research integrity editor- policy, policing, or policing policy. Croat Med J. 2006;47:220-227. Abstract
17. Chhokar JS. Education is not just about jobs. Available at http://www.indianexpress.com/story/7326.html. Accessed November 17, 2006.
18. Bulger RE. Toward a statement of the principles underlying responsible conduct of biomedical research. Acad Med. 1994;69:102-107. Abstract
19. Boynton PM, Greenhalgh T. Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ. 2004;328:1312-1315. Abstract
20. Mainous III AG, Bowman MA, Zoller JS. The importance of interpersonal relationship factors in decisions regarding authorship. Fam Med. 2002;34:462-467. Abstract