Estimation of distributed arterial mechanical properties using a wave propagation model in a reverse way

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 957-967

  Leguy, C A D ^a   Bosboom, E M H ^b   Gelderblom, H ^a   Hoeks, A P G ^b   van de Vosse, F N ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Arterial stiffness; Brachial artery; Sensitivity analysis; Ultrasound; Wave propagation model; Young's modulus

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; BRACHIAL ARTERY; ULTRASOUND; WAVE PROPAGATION MODEL; YOUNG'S MODULUS;

ACOUSTIC WAVE VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; ELASTIC MODULI; ELASTICITY; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STIFFNESS; ULTRASONICS; WAVE PROPAGATION;

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES;

ADULT; ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTERY COMPLIANCE; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD VOLUME; BRACHIAL ARTERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE WAVE; RADIAL ARTERY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; ULNAR ARTERY; WAVEFORM; YOUNG MODULUS;

ADULT; ARTERIES; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD CIRCULATION; BLOOD PRESSURE; ELASTIC MODULUS; HUMANS; MALE; MECHANICAL PROCESSES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78049299960     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.06.010     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Laurent S., Cockcroft J., van Bortel L., Boutouyrie P., Giannattasio C., Hayoz D., et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006, 27:2588-2605.
2. Blacher J., Pannier B., Guerin A., Marchais S., Safar M., London G. Carotid arterial stiffness as a predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension 1998, 32:570-574.
3. Germain D., Boutouyrie P., Laloux B., Laurent S. Arterial remodeling and stiffness in patients with pseudoxanthoma elasticum. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003, 23:836-841.
4. Guerin A., London G., Marchais S., Metivier F. Arterial stiffening and vascular calcifications in end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000, 15:1014-1021.
5. Mattace-Raso F., van der Cammen T., Hofman A., van Popele N., Bos M., Schalekamp M., et al. Arterial stiffness and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: the rotterdam study. Circulation 2006, 113:657-663.
6. Yufu K., Takahashi N., Anan F., Hara M., Yoshimatsu H., Saikawa T. Brachial arterial stiffness predicts coronary atherosclerosis in patients at risk for cardiovascular diseases. Jpn Heart J 2004, 45:231-242.
7. Avolio A. Multi-branched model of the human arterial system. Med Biol Eng Comput 1980, 18:709-718.
8. Lanzarone E., Liani P., Baselli G., Costantino M. Model of arterial tree and peripheral control for the study of physiological and assisted circulation. Med Eng Phys 2007, 29:542-555.
9. Liang F., Liu H. A closed-loop lumped parameter computational model for human cardiovascular system. JSME Int Ser C 2005, 48:484-493.
10. Olufsen M., Peskin C., Kim W., Pedersen E., Nadim A., Larsen J. Numerical simulation and experimental validation of blood flow in arteries with structured-tree outflow conditions. Ann Biomed Eng 2000, 28:1281-1299.
11. Westerhof N., Bosman F., Vries C., Noordergraaf A. Analog studies of the human systemic arterial tree. J Biomech 1969, 2:121-143.
12. Azer K., Peskin C. A one-dimensional model of blood flow in arteries with friction and convection based on the womersley velocity profile. Cardiovasc Eng 2007, 7:51-73.
13. Bessems D., Rutten M, van de Vosse F. A wave propagation model of blood flow in large vessels using an approximate velocity profile function. J Fluid Mech 2007, 580:145-168.
14. Formaggia L., Lamponi D., Tuveri M., Veneziani A. Numerical modeling of 1d arterial networks coupled with a lumped parameters description of the heart. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2006, 9:273-288.
15. Reymond P., Merenda F., Perren F., Rüfenacht D., Stergiopulos N. Validation of a one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009, 297:H208-H222.
16. Sherwin S., Franke V., Peiró J., Parker K. One-dimensional modelling of a vascular network in space-time variables. J Eng Math 2003, 47:217-250.
17. Matthys K., Alastruey J., Peiró J., Khir A., Segers P., Verdonck P., et al. Pulse wave propagation in a model human arterial network: assessment of 1-d numerical simulations against in vitro measurements. J Biomech 2007, 40:3476-3486.
18. Bessems D., Giannopapa C., Rutten M., van de Vosse F. Experimental validation of a time-domain-based wave propagation model of blood flow in viscoelastic vessels. J Biomech 2008, 41:284-291.
19. Marchandise E., Willemet M., Lacroix V. A numerical hemodynamic tool for predictive vascular surgery. Med Eng Phys 2009, 31:131-144.
20. Leguy C., Bosboom E., Hoeks A., van de Vosse F. Model-based assessment of dynamic arterial blood volume flow from ultrasound measurements. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009, 47:641-648.
21. Henry R., Kostense P., Spijkerman A., Dekker J., Nijpels G., Heine R., et al. Arterial stiffness increases with deteriorating glucose tolerance status: the Hoorn study. Circulation 2003, 107:2089-2095.
22. Smilde T., van den Berkmortel F., Boers G., Wollersheim H., de Boo T., van Langen H., et al. Carotid and femoral artery wall thickness and stiffness in patients at risk for cardiovascular disease, with special emphasis on hyperhomocysteinemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1998, 18:1958-1963.
23. Hermeling E, Reesink K., Kornmann L., Reneman R., Hoeks A. The dicrotic notch as alternative time-reference point to measure local pulse wave velocity in the carotid artery by means of ultrasonography. J Hypertens 2009, 27:2028-2035.
24. Parker K., Jones C. Forward and backward running waves in the arteries: analysis using the method of characteristics. J Biomech Eng 1990, 112:322-326.
25. Vermeersch S., Rietzschel E., Buyzere M., Bacquer D., Backer G., van Bortel L., et al. Determining carotid artery pressure from scaled diameter waveforms: comparison and validation of calibration techniques in 2026 subjects. Physiol Meas 2008, 29:1267-1280.
26. Anliker M., Rockwell R., Ogden E. Nonlinear analysis of flow pulses and shock waves in arteries. Z Angew Math Phys 1971, 22:563-581.
27. Michel E., Zernikow B. Gosling's Doppler pulsatility index revisited. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998, 24:597-599.
28. Stroev P., Hoskins P., Easson W. Distribution of wall shear rate throughout the arterial tree: a case study. Atherosclerosis 2007, 191:276-280.
29. Verbeke F., Segers P., Heireman S., Vanholder R., Verdonck P., van Bortel L. Noninvasive assessment of local pulse pressure: importance of brachial-to-radial pressure amplification. Hypertension 2005, 46:244-248.
30. Samijo S., Willigers J., Brands P., Barkhuysen R., Reneman R., Kitslaar P., et al. Reproducibility of shear rate and shear stress assessment by means of ultrasound in the common carotid artery of young human males and females. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997, 23:583-590.
31. Brands P., Hoeks A., Willigers J., Willekes C., Reneman R. An integrated system for the non-invasive assessment of vessel wall and hemodynamic properties of large arteries by means of ultrasound. Eur J Ultrasound 1999, 9:257-266.
32. Brands P., Hoeks A., Hofstra L., Reneman R. A noninvasive method to estimate wall shear rate using ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995, 21:171-185.
33. Ledoux L., Brands P., Hoeks A. Reduction of the clutter component in doppler ultrasound signals based on singular value decomposition: a simulation study. Ultrason Imaging 1997, 19:1-18.
34. Hoeks A.P., Hennerici M., Reneman R. Spectral composition of Doppler signals. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991, 17:751-760.
35. Womersley J. Mathematical theory of oscillating flow in an elastic tube. J Physiol 1955, 127. 37-8P.
36. Stergiopulos N., Segers P., Westerhof N. Use of pulse pressure method for estimating total arterial compliance in vivo. Am J Physiol 1999, 276:H424-H428.
37. Fung Y. Biomechanics: circulation 1996, Springer, Berlin.
38. Murray C. The physiological principle of minimum work. I. The vascular system and the cost of blood volume. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1926, 12:207-214.
39. Painter P., Edén P., Bengtsson H. Pulsatile blood flow, shear force, energy dissipation and murray's law. Theor Biol Med Model 2006, 31:3-31.
40. Benard N., Perrault R., Coisne D. Computational approach to estimating the effects of blood properties on changes in intra-stent flow. Ann Biomed Eng 2006, 34:1259-1271.
41. Kaiser D., Mullen K., Bank A. Brachial artery elastic mechanics in patients with heart failure. Hypertension 2001, 38:1440-1445.
42. Ku Y., Kim Y., Kim J., Choi Y., Yoon S., Kim Y., et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of intima-media thickness of radial artery in pre-dialysis uraemic patients: comparison with histological examination. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006, 21:715-720.
43. Mourad J., Girerd X., Boutouyrie P., Laurent S., Safar M., London G. Increased stiffness of radial artery wall material in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension 1997, 30:1425-1430.
44. Dammers R., Tordoir J., Hameleers J., Kitslaar P., Hoeks A. Brachial artery shear stress is independent of gender or age and does not modify vessel wall mechanical properties. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002, 28:1015-1022.
45. van der Heijden-Spek J., Staessen J., Fagard R., Hoeks A., Boudier H., van Bortel L. Effect of age on brachial artery wall properties differs from the aorta and is gender dependent: a population study. Hypertension 2000, 35:637-642.
46. Zambanini A., Cunningham S., Parker K., Khir A., Thom S., Hughes A. Wave-energy patterns in carotid, brachial, and radial arteries: a noninvasive approach using wave-intensity analysis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005, 289:H270-H276.
47. Learoyd B., Taylor M. Alterations with age in the viscoelastic properties of human arterial walls. Circ Res 1966, 18:278-292.
48. Boutouyrie P., Bézie Y., Lacolley P., Challande P., Chamiot-Clerc P., Benetos A., et al. In vivo/in vitro comparison of rat abdominal aorta wall viscosity. Influence of endothelial function. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997, 17:1346-1355.
49. Gow B., Taylor M. Measurement of viscoelastic properties of arteries in the living dog. Circ Res 1968, 23:111-122.
50. Armentano R., Barra J., Levenson J., Simon A., Pichel R. Arterial wall mechanics in conscious dogs. Assessment of viscous, inertial, and elastic moduli to characterize aortic wall behavior. Circ Res 1995, 76:468-478.
51. Gamero L., Armentano R., Barra J., Simon A., Levenson J. Identification of arterial wall dynamics in conscious dogs. Exp Physiol 2001, 86:519-528.
52. Bank A., Kaiser D., Rajala S., Cheng A. In vivo human brachial artery elastic mechanics: effects of smooth muscle relaxation. Circulation 1999, 100:41-47.
53. Tsamis A., Stergiopulos N. Arterial remodeling in response to hypertension using a constituent-based model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007, 293:H3130-H3139.
54. Fonck E., Prod'hom G., Roy S., Augsburger L., Rüfenacht D.A., Stergiopulos N. Effect of elastin degradation on carotid wall mechanics as assessed by a constituent-based biomechanical model. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007, 292:H2754-H2763.
55. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Andres T., Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Gatelli D., et al. Global sensitivity analysis: the primer 2008, Wiley.
56. Hoogeveen R., Bakker C., Viergever M. Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998, 8:1228-1235.
57. Xiu D., Sherwin S. Parametric uncertainty analysis of pulse wave propagation in a model of a human arterial network. J Comput Phys 2007, 226:1385-1407.
58. Antoniou A., Lu W.-S. Practical optimization 2007, Springer.
59. Masson I., Boutouyrie P., Laurent S., Humphrey J., Zidi M. Characterization of arterial wall mechanical behavior and stresses from human clinical data. J Biomech 2008, 41:2618-2627.
60. Jacquard P., Jain C. Permeability distribution from field pressure data. Soc Petrol Eng J 1965, 5:281-294.
61. Carter R., Kemp L., Pearce A., Williams D. Performance matching with constraints. Soc Petrol Eng J 1974, 14:187-196.
62. Liauh C., Hills R., Roemer R. Comparison of the adjoint and influence coefficient methods for solving the inverse hyperthermia problem. J Biomech Eng 1993, 115:63-71.
63. Su A., Berman F., Wolski R., Strout M. Using AppLeS to schedule simple SARA on the computational grid. Int J High Perform Comput Appl 1999, 13:253-262.