Granularity as a cognitive factor in the effectiveness of business process model reuse

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5701 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 245-260

  Holschke, Oliver ^a   Rake, Jannis ^a   Levina, Olga ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Business Process Model Reuse; Design for Reuse; Experiment; Process Granularity; Reuse Economics; Reuse of Non Code Artifacts

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL REUSE; BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; COGNITIVE FACTORS; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; DECISION MAKERS; DESIGN MODELS; DESIGN TASKS; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ENHANCED TELECOM OPERATIONS MAP; INFORMATION GRANULARITY; MODELING TASK; PROCESS GRANULARITY; QUALITY OF DESIGN; REFERENCE MODELS; REUSE ECONOMICS; REUSE MECHANISM; REUSE OF NON-CODE ARTIFACTS; SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS; SMALL SAMPLE SIZE;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; EXPERIMENTS; PROCESS MONITORING; TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY;

REUSABILITY;

EID: 70349308630     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03848-8_17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Yao, Y.: Probabilistic approaches to rough sets. Expert Systems 20, 287-297 (2003)
2. Frakes, W., Kang, K.: Software reuse research: status and future. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31, 529-536 (2005)
3. Frakes, W.B., Terry, C.: Software Reuse: Metrics and Models. ACM Comput. Surv. 28, 415-435 (1996)
4. Fischer, G.: Cognitive View of Reuse and Redesign. IEEE Software 4, 60-72 (1987)
5. Ye, Y., Fischer, G.: Supporting Reuse by Delivering Task-Relevant and Personalized Information. In: International Conference on Software Engnineering (ICSE 2002). ACM, Orlando (2002)
6. Purao, S., Storey, V.C., Han, T.: Improving Analysis Pattern Reuse in Conceptual Design: Augmenting Automated Processes with Supervised Learning. Information Systems Research 14, 269-290 (2003)
7. Szyperski, C.: Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. Addison-Wesley, New York (1998)
8. vom Brocke, J., Buddendick, C.: Reusable Conceptual Models - Requirements Based on the Design Science Research Paradigm. In: Chen, H., Olfman, L., Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S. (eds.) Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2006), Claremont, CA (2006)
9. Kelly, M.: Enhanced Telecom Operations Map (eTOM) - The Business Process Framework. TeleManagement Forum (2007)
10. Supply-Chain Council: Supply Chain Operations Reference-model Version 8.0. Supply-Chain Council, Inc. (2006)
11. Zimmermann, O., Gschwind, T., Küster, J.M., Leymann, F., Schuster, N.: Reusable Architectural Decision Models for Enterprise Application Development. In: Overhage, S., Szyperski, C.A., Reussner, R., Stafford, J.A. (eds.) Third International Conference on Quality of Software Architectures, Software Architectures, Components, and Applications (QoSA 2007), pp. 15-32. Springer, Medford (2007)
12. Buckl, S., Ernst, A.M., Lankes, J., Schneider, K., Schweda, C.M.: A Pattern based Approach for constructing Enterprise Architecture Management Information Models. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik. Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe (2007)
13. Coad, P., North, D., Mayfield, M.: Object Models: Strategies, Patterns, Applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1996)
14. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)
15. Zdun, U., Hentrich, C., Dustdar, S.: Modeling process-driven and service-oriented architectures using patterns and pattern primitives. ACM Transactions on the Web 1(3) (2007)
16. Sun, W., Zhang, X., Guo, C.J., Sun, P., Su, H.: Software as a Service: Configuration and Customization Perspectives. In: IEEE Congress on Services Part II. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2008)
17. Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J.: Modularity in process models: Review and effects. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 20-35. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
18. Burton-Jones, A., Meso, P.: How good are these UML diagrams? An empirical test of the Wand and Weber good decomposition model. In: 23rd International Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona, pp. 15-18 (2002)
19. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: A model of systems decomposition. In: Tenth International Conference on Information Systems, Boston, MA, pp. 41-51 (1989)
20. Zadeh, L.A.: Towards a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 19, 111-127 (1997)
21. Yao, Y.: A partition model of granular computing. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Grzymala-Busse, J.W., Kostek, B.z., Swiniarski, R.W., Szczuka, M.S. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets I. LNCS, vol. 3100, pp. 232-253. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
22. Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W.: The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press (1963)
23. Parsons, J., Saunders, C.: Cognitive Heuristics in Software Engineering: Applying and Extending Anchoring and Adjustment to Artifact Reuse. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 30, 873-888 (2004)
24. Object Management Group: Business Process Modeling Notation Specification, Version 1.0 (2006)
25. Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Classification of reference models: a methodology and its application Information Systems and E-Business Management 1, 35-53 (2003)
26. Latva-Koivisto, A.M.: Finding a complexity measure for business process models. Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki (2001)
27. Ehrig, M., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Measuring Similarity between Semantic Business Process Models. In: Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM 2007). Australian Computer Society, Inc., Ballarat (2007)
28. Bosak, J., McGrath, T., Holman, G.K.: Universal Business Language v2.0. OASIS (2006)
29. Lindland, I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding quality in conceptual modeling. IEEE Software 11, 42-49 (1994)
30. Moody, D.L., Sindre, G., Brasethvik, T., Sølvberg, A.: Evaluating the quality of process models: Empirical testing of a quality framework. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S.T., Kambayashi, Y. (eds.) ER 2002. LNCS, vol. 2503, p. 380. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)