Reproductive success of cultivated Pyrus calleryana (Rosaceae) and establishment ability of invasive, hybrid progeny

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 97, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1698-1706

  Hardiman, Nicole A ^a   Culley, Theresa M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Cultivation; Intraspecific hybridization; Invasive; Propagule pressure; Pyrus calleryana

Indexed keywords

ALLEE EFFECT; CULTIVAR; CULTIVATION; DICOTYLEDON; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; GENOTYPE; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION; INVASIVE SPECIES; ORNAMENTAL SPECIES; PHYTOMASS; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS;

CHINA; UNITED STATES;

PYRUS; PYRUS CALLERYANA; ROSACEAE;

EID: 78049280271     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1000113     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barrett, S. C., and B. C. Husband.1990. In A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler, B. S. Weir [eds.], Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources, 254-278. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
2. Bossdorf, O., H. Auge, L. Lafuma, W. E. Rogers, E. Siemann, and D. Prati. 2005. Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144: 1-11.
3. Cohen, A. N., and J. T. Carlton. 1998. Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279: 555-558.
4. Courchamp, R., L. Berec, and J. Gascoigne.2008. Alleeeffectsinecology and conservation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
5. Culley, T. M., and N. A. Hardiman. 2007. The beginning of a new invasive plant: A history of the ornamental Callery pear in the United States. Bioscience 57: 956-964.
6. Culley, T. M., and N. A. Hardiman. 2009. The role of intraspecific hybridization in the evolution of invasiveness: A case study of the ornamental pear tree Pyrus calleryana. Biological Invasions 11: 1107-1119.
7. de Nettancourt, D. 2001. Incompatibility and incongruity in wild and cultivated plants, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
8. Doyle, J. J., and J. L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11-15.
9. Ellstrand, N. C., and K. A. Schierenbeck. 2000. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97: 7043-7050.
10. Erickson, D. L., and C. B. Fenster. 2006. Intraspecific hybridization and the recovery of fitness in the native legume Chamaecrista fasciculata. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 60: 225-233.
11. Fenster, C. B., and L. F. Galloway. 2000. Population differentiation in an annual legume: Genetic architecture. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 54: 1157-1172.
12. Gianfranceschi, L., N. Seglias, R. Tarchini, M. Komjanc, and C. Gessler. 1998. Simple sequence repeats for the genetic analysis of apple. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 96: 1069-1076.
13. Guilford, P., S. Prakash, J. M. Zhu, E. Rikkerink, S. Gardiner, H. Bassett, and R. Forster. 1997. Microsatellites in Malus X domestica (apple): Abundance, polymorphism and cultivar identification. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94: 249-254.
14. Harlan, J. R. 1975. Crops and man. American Society of Agronomy and Crop Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
15. Harrison, S. K., E. E. Reginer, J. T. Schmoll, and J. M. Harrison. 2007. Seed size and burial effects on giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) emergence and seed demise. Weed Science 55: 16-22.
16. Hummer, K. E., and J. D. Postman. 2003. Pyrus L. Pear. Website www.nsl.fs.fed. us/wpsm/pyrus.pdf [accessed 29 May 2004].
17. Johansen-Morris, A. D., and R. G. Latta. 2006. Fitness consequences of hybridization between ecotypes of Avena barbata: Hybrid breakdown, hybrid vigor, and transgressive segregation. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 60: 1585-1595.
18. Kalinowski, S. T., M. L. Taper, and T. C. Marshall. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16: 1099-1106.
19. Kelly, D. W., J. R. Muirhead, D. D. Heath, and H. J. Macisaac. 2006. Contrasting patterns in genetic diversity following multiple invasions of fresh and brackish waters. Molecular Ecology 15: 3641-3652.
20. Kolbe, J. J., R. E. Glor, L. R. Schettino, A. C. Lara, A. Larson, and J. B. Losos. 2004. Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 431: 177-181.
21. Kowarik, I. 2003. Human agency in biological invasions: Secondary releases foster naturalization and population expansion of alien plant species. Biological Invasions 5: 293-312.
22. Lafuma, L., and S. Maurice. 2007. Increase in mate availability without loss of self-incompatibility in the invasive species Senecio inaequidens (Asteraceae). Oikos 116: 201-208.
23. Mack, R. N. 2000. Cultivation fosters plant naturalizations by reducing environmental stochasticity. Biological Invasions 2: 111-122.
24. Marrs, R. A., R. Sforza, and R. A. Hufbauer. 2008. Evidence for multiple introductions of Centaurea stoebe micranthos (spotted knapweed, Asteraceae) to North America. Molecular Ecology 17: 4197-4208.
25. Marshall, T. C., J. Slate, L. Kruuk, and J. M. Pemberton. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology 7: 639-655.
26. Reichard, S. H., and P. White. 2001. Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. Bioscience 51: 103-113.
27. Rieseberg, L. H. 1995. The role of hybridization in evolution: Old wine in new skins. American Journal of Botany 82: 944-953.
28. Roman, J., and J. A. Darling. 2007. Paradox lost: Genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22: 454-464.
29. Rosenthal, D. M., A. P. Ramakrishnan, and M. B. Cruzan. 2008. Evidence for multiple sources of invasion and intraspecific hybridization in Brachypodium sylvaticum (Hudson) Beauv. in North America. Molecular Ecology.
30. Stephens, P. A., W. J. Sutherland, and R. P. Freckleton. 1999. What is the Allee effect? Oikos 87: 185-190.
31. Vincent, M. A. 2005. On the spread and current distribution of Pyrus calleryana in the United States. Castanea 70: 20-31.
32. Von Holle, B., and D. Simberloff. 2005. Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology 86: 3212-3218.
33. Wheelwright, N. T. 1993. Fruit size in a tropical tree species: Variation, preference by birds, and heritability. Vegetation 107: 163-174.
34. Wolfe, L. M., A. C. Blair, and B. M. Penna. 2007. Does intraspecific hybridization contribute to the evolution of invasiveness? An experimental test. Biological Invasions 9: 515-521.
35. Yamamoto, T., T. Kimura, Y. Sawamura, et al. 2002. Simple sequence repeats for genetic analysis in pear. Euphytica 124:129-137.