Event-related potential measures of processing during an Implicit Association Test

NeuroReport

Volumn 21, Issue 16, 2010, Pages 1029-1033

  Coates, Mark A ^a   Campbell, Kenneth B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

event related potentials; Implicit Association Test; reaction time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPLICIT ASSOCIATION TEST; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; SOCIAL ATTITUDE;

ADOLESCENT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78049268485     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833f5e7d     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Greenwald AG, McGhee DE, Schwartz JLK. Measuring individual difference in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol 1998; 74:1464-1480.
2. Nosek BA, Greenwald AG, Banaji MB. The Implicit Association Test at age 7: methodological and conceptual review. In: Bargh JA, editor. Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior. London: Psychology Press; 2007. pp. 265-292.
3. Donchin E, Coles MGH. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behav Brain Sci 1988; 11:357-374.
4. Kok A. Event-related-potential (ERP) reflections of mental resources: a review and synthesis. Biol Psychol 1997; 45:19-56.
5. Kutas M, McCarthy G, Donchin E. Augmenting mental chronometry; the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science 1977; 197:792-795.
6. Johnson R, Donchin E. On how P300 amplitude varies with the utility of the eliciting stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1978; 17:167-178.
7. Johnson R. A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology 1986; 23:367-384.
8. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118:2128-2148.
9. Folstein JR, Van Petten C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 2008; 45:152-170.
10. Gajewski PD, Stoerig P, Falkenstein M. ERP Correlates of response selection in a response conflict paradigm. Brain Res 2008; 1189:127-134.
11. Liottti M, Woldorff MG, Perez R, Mayberg HS. An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38:701-711.
12. Brendl CM, Markman AB, Messner C. How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001; 81:760-773.
13. Mierke J, Klauer KC. Implicit association measurement with the IAT: evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie 2001; 48:107-122.
14. Klauer KC, Schmitz F, Teige-Mocigemba S, Voss A. Understanding the role of executive control in the Implicit Association Test: why flexible people have small IAT effects. Q J Exp Psychol 2010; 63:595-619.
15. Johnson R, Donchin E. Second thoughts: multiple P300s elicited by a single stimulus. Psychophysiology 1985; 22:182-194.
16. Muller-Gass A, Gonthier I, Desrochers A, Campbell KB. Multiple P3 evidence of a two-stage process in word gender decision. Neuroreport 2000; 11:3527-3531.
17. Girodo M, Deck TP, Campbell KB. Event-related potentials reveal the effects of altering personal identity. Neuroreport 2002; 13:1595-1598.
18. Woestenberg J, Verbatan M, Slangen J. The removal of the eye-movement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain. Biol Psychol 1983; 16:127-147.
19. Alho K, Sams M, Paavilainen P, Reinikainen K, Näätänen R. Event-related brain potentials reflecting processing of relevant and irrelevant stimuli during selective listening. Psychophysiology 1989; 26:514-528.
20. Williams JK, Themansen JR. Neural correlates of the Implicit Association Test: evidence for semantic and emotional processing. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2010, doi:10.1093/scan/nsq065.