Evaluation of a sentence ranker for text summarization based on Roget's thesaurus

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6231 LNAI, Issue , 2010, Pages 101-108

  Kennedy, Alistair ^a   Szpakowicz, Stan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC METHOD; AUTOMATIC TEXT SUMMARIZATION; RANKING SYSTEM; SUMMARIZATION SYSTEMS; TEXT SUMMARIZATION; WHOLE SYSTEMS;

THESAURI;

EID: 78049262967     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15760-8_14     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Nenkova, A., Passonneau, R. J.: Evaluating content selection in summarization: The pyramid method. In: HLT-NAACL, pp. 145-152 (2004)
2. Nenkova, A., Passonneau, R., McKeown, K.: The pyramid method: Incorporating Human Content Selection Variation in Summarization Evaluation. ACM Trans. Speech Lang. Process. 4 (2007) (Pubitemid 46815225)
3. Copeck, T., Inkpen, D., Kazantseva, A., Kennedy, A., Kipp, D., Nastase, V., Szpakowicz, S.: Leveraging DUC. In: HLT-NAACL 2006 - Document Understanding Workshop, DUC (2006)
4. Nastase, V., Szpakowicz, S.: A Study of Two Graph Algorithms in Topic-Driven Summarization. In: Proc. TextGraphs: 1st Workshop on Graph Based Methods for Natural Language Processing, pp. 29-32 (2006)
5. Fuentes, M., Alfonseca, E., Rodríguez, H.: Support Vector Machines for Query-Focused Summarization Trained and Evaluated on Pyramid Data. In: Proc. 45th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Poster and Demonstration Sessions, pp. 57-60 (2007)
6. Katragadda, R., Pingali, P., Varma, V.: Sentence Position Revisited: a Robust Light-Weight Update Summarization 'baseline' Algorithm. In: CLIAWS3 2009: Proc. Third International Workshop on Cross Lingual Information Access, pp. 46-52 (2009)
7. Lin, C. Y., Hovy, E.: Identifying topics by position. In: Proc. Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, Morristown, NJ, USA, pp. 283-290. Association for Computational Linguistics (1997)
8. Katragadda, R., Varma, V.: Query-Focused Summaries or Query-Biased Summaries? In: Proc. ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, pp. 105-108 (2009)
9. Jarmasz, M., Szpakowicz, S.: Roget's Thesaurus and Semantic Similarity. In: Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing III. Selected papers from RANLP 2003. CILT, vol. 260, pp. 111-120. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2004)
10. Kennedy, A., Szpakowicz, S.: Evaluating Roget's Thesauri. In: Proc. ACL 2008: HLT, Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 416-424 (2008)
11. Jarmasz, M., Szpakowicz, S.: Not As Easy As It Seems: Automating the Construction of Lexical Chains Using Roget's Thesaurus. In: Proc. 16th Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI 2003), Halifax, Canada, pp. 544-549 (2003) (Pubitemid 36796089)
12. Radev, D. R., Jing, H., Styś, M., Tam, D.: Centroid-Based Summarization of Multiple Documents. Inf. Process. Manage. 40, 919-938 (2004)
13. Zhu, M.: Recall, Precision and Average Precision. Technical Report 09, Department of Statistics & Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo (2004)
14. Carbonell, J., Goldstein, J.: The Use of MMR, Diversity-Based Reranking for Reordering Documents and Producing Summaries. In: Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 335-336 (1998)