A Study of Two Graph Algorithms in Topic-driven Summarization

Proceedings of TextGraphs: The 1st Workshop on Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2020, Pages 29-32

  Nastase, Vivi ^a   Szpakowicz, Stan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPHIC METHODS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

COLLECTION OF DOCUMENTS; DOCUMENT UNDERSTANDING; TEST DATA;

GRAPH ALGORITHMS;

EID: 77953795363     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Terry Copeck and Stan Szpakowicz. 2005. Leveraging pyramids. http://duc.nist.gov/pubs/2005papers/uottawa.copeck2.pdf.
2. Hoa Trang Dang. 2005. Overview of DUC 2005. http://duc.nist.gov/pubs/2005papers/OVERVIEW05.pdf.
3. Güneş Erkan and Dragomir Radev. 2004. LexRank: Graph-based centrality as salience in text summarization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, (22).
4. Seeger Fisher, Brian Roark, Jianji Yang, and Bill Hersh. 2005. Ogi/ohsu baseline query-directed multi-document summarization system for duc-2005. http://duc.nist.gov/pubs/2005papers/ohsu.seeger.pdf.
5. Aria Haghighi, Andrew Ng, and Christopher Manning. 2005. Robust textual inference via graph matching. In Proc. of HLT-EMNLP 2005, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
6. Dekang Lin. 1998. Dependency-based evaluation of MiniPar. In Workshop on the Evaluation of Parsing Systems, Granada, Spain.
7. Rada Mihalcea and Paul Tarau. 2004. Textrank: Bringing order into texts. In Proc. of EMNLP 2004, Barcelona, Spain.
8. Rada Mihalcea. 2004. Graph-based ranking algorithms for sentence extraction, applied to text summarization. In Proc. of ACL 2004, Barcelona, Spain.
9. Ani Nenkova and Rebecca Passonneau. 2004. Evaluating content selection in summarization: the pyramid method. In Proc. of NAACL-HLT 2004.