IT requirements of business process management in practice - An empirical study

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6336 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 13-28

  Patig, Susanne ^a   Casanova Brito, Vanessa ^a   Vögeli, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; MODELING LANGUAGES;

BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; ORIENTED PROCESS; PUBLIC COMPANY; SOFTWARE INTEGRATION;

ADMINISTRATIVE DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 78049247519     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15618-2_4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Economist Intelligence Unit (in co-operation with the IBM Institute for Business Value): The 2006 e-readiness rankings. A White Paper from the Economist Intelligence Unit. London et al. (2006)
2. Forbes: The Forbes Global (2000), http://www.forbes.com/2005/03/30/ 05f2000land.html
3. Gravetter, F. J., Wallnau, L. B.: Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 8th edn. Wadsworth, Belmont (2009)
4. Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Business process modeling: Perceived Benefits. In: Laender, A. H. F. (ed.) ER 2009. LNCS, vol. 5829, pp. 458-471. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
5. Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Business process modeling: Current issues and future challenges. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 501-514. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
6. Jackson, S. L.: Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach, 3rd edn. Wadsworth, Belmont (2009)
7. Jaklic, J., Bosilj-Vuksic, V., Stemberger, M. I.: Business Process Oriented Tool Selection Model - A Case Study. In: Hlupic, V., et al. (eds.) 1st Int. Conf. Future Challenges and Current Issues in Business Information, Organization and Process Management 2006, pp. 94-102. Westminster Business School, London (2006)
8. Künger, P., Hagen, C.: The fruits of Business Process Management: an experience report from a Swiss bank. Business Process Management Journal 13, 477-487 (2007)
9. Limesurvey, Version 1.85, http://www.limesurvey.org
10. McCormack, K., et al.: A global investigation of key turning points in business process maturity. Business Process Management Journal 15, 792-815 (2009)
11. Neubauer, T.: An empirical study about the status of business process management. Business Process Management Journal 15, 166-183 (2009)
12. Nietro-Ariza, E. M., Rodriguez-Ortiz, G., Ortiz-Hermández, J.: An empirical evaluation for business process tools. In: Ochoa, S. F., Roman, G.-C. (eds.) Advanced Software Engineering: Expanding the Frontiers of Software Technology, pp. 77-84. Springer, Boston (2006) (Pubitemid 44090506)
13. Object Management Group (OMG): Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 1.2. OMG Document Number: formal/2009-01-03, http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/1.2
14. Pernici, B., Weske, M.: Business process management. Data & Knowledge Engineering 56, 1-3 (2007) (Pubitemid 41542964)
15. Pritchard, J.-P., Armisted, C.: Business process management - Lessons from European Business. Business Process Management Journal 5, 10-35 (1999)
16. Rosemann, M., De Bruin, T., Hueffner, T.: A Model for Business Process Management Maturity. In: Proc. ACIS 2004, Paper 6(2004), http://aisel.aisnet. org/acis2004/6
17. Recker, J.: BPMN Modeling - Who, where, how and why. BPTrends (March 2008) http://www.sparxsystems.com/press/articles/pdf/bpmn-survey.pdf
18. Schmietendorf, A.: Assessment of Business Process Modeling Tools under Consideration of Business Process Management Activities. In: Dumke, R., et al. (eds.) IWSM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5338, pp. 141-154. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
19. van der Aalst, W. M. P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F., Verbeek, E.: Business process management: Where business processes and web services meet. Data & Knowledge Engineering 61, 1-5 (2007) (Pubitemid 46282151)
20. Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, Berlin (2007)
21. The Workflow Management Coalition (WfMC): The Workflow Reference Model, Document Number TC00-1003, Issue 1. 1 (November 19 1995), http://www.wfmc.org/ standards/docs/tc003v11.pdf
22. The Workflow Management Coalition (WfMC): Terminology & Glossary, Document Number WFMC-TC-1011, Issue 3.0 (February 1999), http://www.wfmc.org/ standards/docs/TC-1011-term-glossary-v3.pdf
23. Wolf, C., Harmon, P.: The State of Business Process Management 2010. BPTrends Reports (February 2010), http://www.bptrends.com/surveys-landing.cfm
24. zur Muehlen, M., Recker, J., Indulska, M.: Sometimes less is more: Are process modeling languages overly complex? In: Proc. EDOC Conference Workshop, EDOC. Eleventh International IEEE, Annapolis, MD, pp. 197-204 (2007)
25. zur Muehlen, M., Recker, J.: How much language is enough? Theoretical and practical use of the Business Process Modeling Notation. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 465-479. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)