Argumentation 3.0: How Semantic Web technologies can improve argumentation modeling in Web 2.0 environments

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 216, Issue , 2010, Pages 439-446

  Schneider, Jodi ^a   Passant, Alexandre ^a   Groza, Tudor ^a   Breslin, John G ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

argumentation tools; distributed conversations; informal argumentation; Semantic Web; social networking

Indexed keywords

INTEROPERABILITY; ONLINE SYSTEMS; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

ARGUMENTATION MODEL; ARGUMENTATION TOOL; DISTRIBUTED CONVERSATION; INFORMAL ARGUMENTATION; SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGY; SEMANTIC-WEB; SOCIAL WEBS; SOCIAL-NETWORKING; WEB 2.0; WEB 2.0 APPLICATIONS;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 78049241638     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-619-5-439     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Tim Berners-Lee. Weaving the Web. Harper Paperbacks, 1st edition, 2000.
2. John G. Breslin, Andreas Harth, Uldis Bojars, and Stefan Decker. Towards Semantically-Interlinked Online Communities. In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, pages 500-514. Springer, 2005.
3. Carlos Chesnevar, Jarred McGinnis, Sanjay Modgil, Iyad Rahwan, Chris Reed, Guillermo Simari, Matthew South, Gerard Vreeswijk, and Steven Willmott. Towards an Argument Interchange Format. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 04(04):293-316, 2006.
4. Jeff Conklin, Albert Selvin, Simon Buckingham Shum, and Maarten Sierhuis. Facilitated hypertext for collective sensemaking: 15 years on from gIBIS. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pages 123-124. ACM, 2001.
5. danah boyd, Scott Golder, and Gilad Lotan. Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In HICSS-43. IEEE, 2010.
6. Ben Kei Daniel, Alexandre Passant, Sheila Kinsella, Uldis Bojars, John G. Breslin, and Stefan Decker. Understanding online communities by using Semantic Web technologies. In Handbook of Research on Methods and Techniques for Studying Virtual Communities: Paradigms and Phenomena. Information Science Publishing, 2010.
7. Aldo de Moor, Jack Park, and Madalina Croitoru. Argumentation map generation with conceptual graphs: the case for ESSENCE. In CS-TIW 2009, 2009.
8. Kathleen Fitzpatrick. CommentPress: new (Social) structures for new (Networked) texts. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 3(3), 2007.
9. Tudor Groza, Siegfried Handschuh, Tim Clark, Simon Buckingham Shum, and Anita de Waard. A short survey of discourse representation models. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Web Applications in Scientific Discourse (SWASD 2009) at SWC-2009, volume 523. CEUR-WS.org, 2009.
10. Tudor Groza, Siegfried Handschuh, Knud Möller, and Stefan Decker. SALT - semantically annotated LaTeX for scientific publications. In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. Springer, 2007.
11. K. D. Knorr-Cetina. Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture and Society, 4(4):1-30, 1997.
12. Werner Kunz and Horst W. J. Rittel. Issues as elements of information systems. Working Paper 131, Center for Planning and Development Research, University of California at Berkeley, 1970.
13. Raquel Mochales Palau and Marie-Francine Moens. Automatic argumentation detection and its role in law and the Semantic Web. In Law, Ontologies and the Semantic Web - Channelling the Legal Information Flood, pages 115-129. IOS Press, 2009.
14. Alexandre Passant, Paolo Ciccarese, John G. Breslin, and Tim Clark. SWAN/SIOC: aligning scientific discourse representation and social semantics. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Web Applications in Scientific Discourse (SWASD 2009) at (ISWC-2009), volume 523. CEUR-WS.org, 2009.
15. Iyad Rahwan. Mass argumentation and the Semantic Web. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 1(1):29-37, 2008.
16. Iyad Rahwan, Fouad Zablith, and Chris Reed. Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web. Artificial Intelligence, 171 (10-15): 897-921, 2007.
17. David A. Shamma, Lyndon Kennedy, and Elizabeth F. Churchill. Tweet the debates. In Proceedings of the first SIGMM workshop on Social Media, pages 3-10. ACM, 2009.
18. Frank M. Shipman and Catherine C. Marshall. Formality considered harmful: Experiences, emerging themes, and directions on the use of formal representations in interactive systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4(4):333-352, 1999.
19. Simon J. Buckingham Shum, Victoria Uren, Gangmin Li, Bertrand Sereno, and Clara Mancini. Modeling naturalistic argumentation in research literatures: Representation and interaction design issues. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1(1):17-47, 2007.
20. Christoph Tempich, H. Sofia Pinto, York Sure, and Steffen Staab. An argumentation ontology for DIstributed, loosely-controlled and evolvInG engineering processes of oNTologies (DILIGENT). In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, pages 241-256. Springer, 2005.
21. Christoph Tempich, Elena Simperl, Markus Luczak, Rudi Studer, and H. Sofia Pinto. Argumentation-Based ontology engineering. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 6(6):52-59, 2007.
22. Simon Wells, Colin Gourlay, and Chris Reed. Argument blogging. In CMNA 2009, Pasadena, CA, 2009.
23. Simon Wells and Chris Reed. MAgtALO: an Agent-Based system for persuasive online interaction. In AISB 2008, 2008.
24. Ka-Ping Yee. Zest: Discussion mapping for mailing lists. In CSCW 2002. ACM, 2002.