An argumentation ontology for dIstributed, loosely-controlled and evolvInG engineering processes of oNTologies (DILIGENT)

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3532, Issue , 2005, Pages 241-256

  Tempich, Christoph ^b   Pinto, H Sofia ^a   Sure, York ^b   Staab, Steffen ^c  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

^c University of Koblenz   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; SERVERS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

AUTOMATIC ONTOLOGY; DILIGENT ONTOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; ONTOLOGY;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 26444552199     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11431053_17     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., Corcho, O.: Ontological Engineering. Advanced Information and Knowlege Processing. Springer (2003)
2. Pinto, H.S., Tempich, C., Staab, S., Sure, Y.: Diligent: Towards a fine-grained methodology for distributed, loosely-controlled and evolving engingeering of ontologies. In de Mántaras, R.L., Saitta, L., eds.: Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2004), August 22nd - 27th, Valencia, Spain, IOS Press (2004) 393-397
3. Pinto, M.S., Staab, S., Sure, Y., Tempich, C.: OntoEdit Empowering SWAP: a Case Study in Supporting Distributed, Loosely-Controlled and evolvInG Engineering of oNTologies (DILIGENT). In Bussler, C., et al., eds.: Proceedings of the 1st ESWS 2004. (2004)
4. Buckingham Shum, S., Motta, E., Domingue, J.: Augmenting design deliberation with compendium: The case of collaborative ontology design. In: HypA-CoM 2002: Facilitating Hypertext-Augmented Collaborative Modeling. ACM Hypertext'02 Workshop, University Maryland, MD (2002) Retrieved November 24, 2004 from http://kmi.open.ac.uk/projects/compendium/SBS-HT02-Compendium.html.
5. Ramesh, B., Dhar, V.: Supporting systems development by capturing deliberations during requirements engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 18 (1992) 498-510
6. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Ontology learning for the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16 (2001)
7. Sure, Y., Studer, R.: On-To-Knowledge methodology. In Davies, J., et al., eds.: On-To-Knowledge: Semantic Web enabled Knowledge Management. J. Wiley and Sons (2002)
8. Holsapple, C.W., Joshi, K.D.: A collaborative approach to ontology design. Commun. ACM 45 (2002) 42-47
9. Kotis, K., Vouros, G.A., Alonso, J.P.: HCOME: tool-supported methodology for collaboratively devising living ontologies. In: SWDB'04: Second International Workshop on Semantic Web and Databases 29-30 August 2004 Co-located with VLDB, Springer-Verlag (2004)
10. Kunz, W., Rittel, H.W.J.: Issues as elements of information systems. Working Paper 131, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California (1970)
11. Aschoff, F.R., Schmalhofer, F., van Eist, L.: Knowledge mediation: A procedure for the cooperative construction of domain ontologies. In Abecker, A., van Elst, L., Dignum, V., eds.: Proceedings of Workshop on Agent-Mediated Knowledge Management at the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI'2004), Valencia, Spain (2004) 20-28
12. Conklin, J., Begeman, M.L.: gibis: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. In: Proc. of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. (1988)
13. Potts, C., Bruns, G.: Recording the reasons for design decisions. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Software engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press (1988)
14. Gotel, O., Finkelstein, A.: Extended requirements traceability: Results of an industrial case study. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE'97), IEEE Computer Society (1997) 169
15. Selvin, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Sierhuis, M., Conklin, J., Zimmermann, B., Palus, C., Drath, W., Horth, D., Domingue, J., Motta, E., Li, G.: Compendium: Making meetings into knowledge events. In: Knowledge Technologies, Austin, TX (2001)
16. Mann, W.C., Thompson, S.A.: Rhetorical structure theory: A theory of text organization. In Polanyi, L., ed.: The Structure of Discourse. Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, N.J. (1987)
17. Gordon, T.F., Karacapilidis, N.: The zeno argumentation framework. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, ACM Press (1997) 10-18
18. Hunter, A.: Towards higher impact argumentation. In McGuinness, D.L., Ferguson, G., eds.: AAAI2004, AAAI Press / The MIT Press (2004) 275-280
19. Pinto, H.S., Martins, J.: A Methodology for Ontology Integration. In: Proc. of the First Int. Conf. on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP2001), New York, ACM Press (2001) 131-138
20. Uschold, M., King, M.: Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In: Proc. of IJCAI95 WS, Montreal, Canada (1995)
21. Gruber, T.R.: Towards Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. In Guarino, N., Poli, R., eds.: Formal Ontol. in Conc. Analysis and Knowl. Rep., Kluwer Acad. Pub. (1993)
22. Buckingham Shum, S., Gangmin Li, V.U., Domingue, J., Motta, E.: Visualizing internet-worked argumentation. In Kirschner, P.A., et al., eds.: Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. Springer (2003) 185-204
23. Stojanovic, L., Maedche, A., Motik, B., Stojanovic, N.: User-driven ontology evolution management. In: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management EKAW, Madrid, Spain (2002)