Adaptive neuro-fuzzy modeling for prediction of ambient CO concentration at urban intersections and roadways

Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 203-212

  Jain, Suresh ^a,b   Khare, Mukesh ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI   (India)

^b TERI UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Fuzzy inference system; Fuzzy logic; Neural network; Urban air pollution; Vehicular emissions

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; AIR QUALITY; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; CARBON MONOXIDE; CLIMATE PREDICTION; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FUZZY MATHEMATICS; ROAD; TRAFFIC EMISSION; TROPICAL METEOROLOGY; URBAN AREA;

DELHI; INDIA;

EID: 78049241437     PISSN: 18739318     EISSN: 18739326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11869-010-0073-8     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Button K, Verhoef ET (1998) Road pricing traffic congestion and the environment: issues of efficiency. Edward Elgar Publication, Williston.
2. Chang PT, Huang LC, Lin HJ (2000) The fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy statistics and membership function fitting and an application to the human resources. Fuzzy Sets Syst 112: 511-520. doi: 10. 1016/S0165-0114(98)00067-0.
3. Comrie AC (1997) Comparing neural networks and regression model for ozone forecasting. Journal of Air and Waste Management Association 47: 653-663, ISSN 1047-3289.
4. Faiz A, Sturm PJ (2000) New directions: air pollution and road traffic in developing countries. Atmos Environ 34: 4745-4746. doi: 10. 1016/S1352-2310(00)00255-7.
5. Fisher B (2003) Review fuzzy environmental decision-making: applications in air pollution. Atmos Environ 37: 1865-1877. doi: 10. 1016/S1352-2310(03)00028-1.
6. Gardner MW, Dorling SR (2000a) Statistical surface ozone models: an improved methodology to account for non-linear behavior. Atmos Environ 34(1): 21-34. doi: 10. 1016/S1352-2310(99)00359-3.
7. Gardner MW, Dorling SR (2000b) Meteorologically adjusted trends in UK daily maximum surface ozone concentrations. Atmos Environ 34: 171-176. doi: 10. 1016/S1352-2310(99)00315-5.
8. Ghose MK, Paulb R, Banerjee SK (2004) Assessment of the impacts of vehicular emissions on urban air quality and its management in Indian context: the case of Kolkata (Calcutta). Environ Sci Policy 7: 345-351. doi: 10. 1016/j. envsci. 2004. 05. 004.
9. Gokhale S, Khare M (2005) A hybrid model for predicting carbon monoxide from vehicular exhausts in urban environments. Atmos Environ 39(22): 4025-4040. doi: 10. 1016/j. atmosenv. 2005. 04. 010.
10. Heo JS, Kim DS (2004) A new method of ozone forecasting using fuzzy expert and neural network systems. Sci Total Environ 325: 221-237. doi: 10. 1016/j. scitotenv. 2003. 11. 009.
11. Horikawa S, Furuhashi T, Uchikawa Y (1992) On fuzzy modelling using fuzzy neural networks with the back-propagation algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3(5): 801-806. doi: 10. 1109/72. 159069.
12. Ishibuchi H, Kwon K, Tanaka H (1995) A learning algorithm of fuzzy neural networks with triangular fuzzy weights. Fuzzy Sets Syst 71: 277-293. doi: 10. 1016/0165-0114(94)00281-B.
13. Ishikawa A, Amagasa M, Tomiqawa G, Tatsuta R, Mieno H (1993) The mix-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Syst 55: 241-253.
14. Jain S (2007) Neuro-Fuzzy Modelling of Vehicular Exhaust Emissions on Urban Roads, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Ph. D. thesis.
15. Jakeman AK, Simpson RW, Taylor JA (1988) Modelling distributions of air pollutant concentrations-III: hybrid modelling deterministic-statistical distributions. Atmos Environ 22(1): 163-174. doi: 10. 1016/0004-6981(88)90309-5.
16. Jang JSR (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23: 665-685. doi: 10. 1109/21. 256541.
17. Jang JSR (1996) Input selection for ANFIS learning. 0-7803-3645-3/96, IEEE 1493-1499. ISBN ∼ ISSN: 1098-7584, 978-1-4244-3596-8.
18. Kandlikar M (2007) Air pollution at a hotspot location in Delhi: detecting trends, seasonal cycles and oscillations. Atmos Environ 41: 5934-5947. doi: 10. 1016/j. atmosenv. 2007. 03. 044.
19. Khare M, Sharma P (1999) Performance evaluation general finite line source model for Delhi traffic conditions. Transp Res, Part D 4: 65-70. doi: 10. 1016/S1361-9209(98)00025-X.
20. Khare M, Sharma P (2002) Modelling the vehicular exhausts emission. WIT, UK.
21. Kolehmainen M, Martikainen H, Ruuskanen J (2001) Neural networks and periodic components used in air quality forecasting. Atmos Environ 35: 815-825. doi: 10. 1016/S1352-2310(00)00385-X.
22. Lin CT, Lee CSG (1991) Neural-network-based fuzzy logic control and decision system. IEEE Trans Comput C 40(12): 1320-1336.
23. Longhurst JWS, Beattie CI, Chatterton TJ, Woodfield NK (2003) Improving air quality through local air quality management. A critical review of British experience and practice. Clean Air 33(4): 84-87.
24. Mckone TE, Deshpande AW (2005) Can fuzzy LOGIC bring complex environmental problems into focus? Environ Science Technol 15: 42a-47a.
25. Morabito FC, Versaci M (2003) Fuzzy neural identification and forecasting techniques to process experimental urban air pollution data. Neural Netw 16: 493-506. doi: 10. 1016/S0893-6080(03)00019-4.
26. Nagendra SMS, Khare M (2003) Principal component analysis of urban traffic characteristics and meteorological data. Transp Res, Part D 8: 285-297. doi: 10. 1016/S1361-9209(03)00006-3.
27. Nagendra SMS, Khare M (2004) Artificial neural network based line source models for vehicular exhaust emission predictions of an urban roadway. Transp Res Part D 9(3): 199-208. doi: 10. 1016/j. trd. 2004. 01. 002.
28. Nunnari G (2000) Simplified fuzzy modelling of pollutant time series. Neural Netw World 10(6): 983-1000.
29. Rao ST, Sistla G, Petersen WB, Irwin JS, Turner DB (1985) Evaluation of the performance of RAM with the regional air pollution study data base. Atmos Environ 19: 229-245. doi: 10. 1016/0004-6981(85)90091-5.
30. Ross TM (1997) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. McGraw-Hill, Inc, New York, pp 232-312.
31. Sugeno M, Kang GT (1989) Structure identification of fuzzy model. Fuzz Sets Syst 28: 15-33. doi: 10. 1016/S0165-0114(02)00111-2.
32. Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 15: 116-132.
33. WHO (2000) Guidelines for air quality. WHO/SDE/OEH/ 00. 02. World Health Organization, Geneva. Retrieved on 12th June 2006 from http://www. who. int/peh/.
34. Willmott CJ (1981) On the validation of models. Phys Geog 2: 184-194.
35. Willmott CJ (1982) Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 63: 1309-1313. doi: 0003-00007/82/111309-05$05. 25.
36. Willmott CJ, Wicks DE (1980) An empirical method for the spatial interpolation of monthly precipitation within California. Phys Geog 1: 59-73.
37. Willmott CJ, Ackleson SG, Davis RE, Feddema JJ, Klink KM, Legates DR, O'Donnel J, Powe CM (1985) Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. J of Geophy Res 90: 8995-9005.
38. World Resources Institute WRI (1992) Urban air pollution in mega cities of the world. Blackwell reference, Oxford, p 39.
39. World Resources Institute WRI (1998) A guide to the global environment. In collaboration with United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and World Bank (IBRD), World Resources (1998-99). Oxford University Press, New York.
40. Yildirim Y, Bayramoglu M (2006) Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy based modelling for prediction of air pollution daily levels in city of Zonguldak. Chemosphere 63(9): 1575-1582. doi: 10. 1016/j. chemosphere. 2005. 08. 070.
41. Zadeh L (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Parts 1, 2 and 3, inf. Sci., 1975, vol. 8, pp. 199-249, 301-357, vol. 9 pp. 43-80.
42. Zanetti P (1990) Air pollution modeling. Theories, computational methods and available software. Computational Mechanics Publications, NY.