BioDome regenerative sleeve for biochemical and biophysical stimulation of tissue regeneration

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1065-1073

  Hechavarria, Daniel ^a   Dewilde, Abiche ^b   Braunhut, Susan ^b   Levin, Michael ^a,c   Kaplan, David L ^a  

^a Tufts University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

BioDome; Biophysical; Electrical stimulation; Tissue regeneration

Indexed keywords

BIODOME; BIOPHYSICAL; BIOPHYSICAL STIMULATION; ELECTRICAL STIMULATIONS; MAMMALIAN SPECIES; MAMMALIAN TISSUES; MATRIX; MULTICOMPONENTS; PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT; RE-GROWTH; SYSTEMATIC STUDY; TISSUE GROWTH; TISSUE REGENERATION; URINARY BLADDER; VERTEBRATE LIMB; WOUND SITE;

BIOPHYSICS; HYDRATES; MAMMALS;

TISSUE;

COLLAGEN; PEPSIN A;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FINGER AMPUTATION; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; TISSUE REGENERATION; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; BIOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; BIOPHYSICAL PROCESSES; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EXTREMITIES; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; MALE; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PEPSIN A; URINARY BLADDER;

EID: 78049234097     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brockes J.P. Amphibian limb regeneration: rebuilding a complex structure. Science 1997, 276:81-87.
2. Birnbaum K.D. Slicing across kingdoms: regeneration in plants and animals. Cell 2008, 132:687-710.
3. Tsonis P.A. Limb regeneration 1996, Cambridge University Press, New York.
4. Stocum D.M. Regenerative biology and medicine 2006, Elsevier Inc., New York.
5. Martin P. Wound healing-aiming of perfect skin regeneration. Science 1997, 276:75-81.
6. Carlson B.M. Principles of regenerative biology 2007, Elsevier Inc., New York.
7. Illingworth C.M. Trapper fingers and amputated finger tips in children. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 1974, 9:853-858.
8. Borgens R.B. What is the role of naturally produced electric current in vertebrate regeneration and healing?. International Review of Cytology 1982, 76:245-296.
9. Levin M. Bioelectric mechanisms in regeneration: unique aspects and future perspectives. Seminars in Cell & Development Biology 2009, 20:543-546.
10. Sisken B.F. Response of amputated rat limbs to fetal nerve tissue implants and direct current. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 1984, 2:177-189.
11. Badylak S.F. Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Transplant Immunology 2004, 12:367-377.
12. Cone C.D. Control of somatic cell mitosis by simulated changes in the transmembrane potential level. Oncology 1971, 25:168-182.
13. Ashcroft G.S. Sex difference in wound healing. Advances in Molecular and Cell Biology 2004, 34:321-328.
14. Smith S.D. The role of electrode position in the electrical induction of limb regeneration in subadult rats. Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics 1981, 8:661-670.
15. Balakatounis K.C., Angoules A.G. Low-intensity electrical stimulation in wound healing: review of the efficacy of externally applied currents resembling the current of injury. ePlasty 2008, 8:283-291.
16. Binggeli R., Wienstein R. Membrane potentials and sodium channels: hypothesis for growth regulation and cancer formation based on changes in sodium channels and gap junctions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1986, 123:377-401.
17. Borgens R.B., Vanable J.W., Jaffe L.F. Small artificial currents enhance xenopus limb regeneration. Journal of Experimental Zoology 1979, 207:217-226.
18. Borgens R.B., Vanable J.W., Jaffe L.F. Role of subdermal current shunts in the failure of frogs to regenerate. Journal of Experimental Zoology 1979, 209:49-56.
19. Levin M. Large-scale biophysics: ion flows and regeneration. Trends in Cell Biology 2007, 17:251-310.
20. Pritchard J.J, Ruzicka A.J. Comparison of fracture repair in the frog, lizard and rat. Journal of Anatomy 1950, 84:236-261.
21. Reing J.E., Zhang L., Myers-Irvin J., Cordero K.E., Freytes D.O., Heber-Katz E., et al. Degradation products of extracellular matrix affect cell migration and proliferation. Tissue Engineering 2009, 15(March (3)):605-614. PMID: 18652541.
22. Turner NJ, Yates Jr AJ, Weber DJ, Qureshi IR, Stolz DB, Gilbert TW, et al. Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as an inductive niche for regeneration of functional skeletal muscle. PNAS; in press.
23. Vorotnikova E, McIntosh D, Dewilde A, Zhang J, Reing JE, Zhang L, et al. MRL cell matrix-derived products modulate endothelial and progenitor cell migration and proliferation in vitro and stimulate regenerative healing in vivo. Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration; in press.