Influence of the privacy issue in the deployment and design of networking robots in European urban areas

Advanced Robotics

Volumn 24, Issue 13, 2010, Pages 1873-1899

  Sanfeliu, Alberto ^a   Llácer, Maria Rosa ^b   Gramunt, Maria Dolors ^b   Punsola, Albert ^c   Yoshimura, Yuji ^c  

^a INSTITUT DE ROBÒTICA I INFORMÀTICA INDUSTRIAL CSIC UPC   (Spain)

^b Grup de Recerca en Dret Privat   (Spain)

^c Barcelona Urban Ecology Agency   (Spain)

Author keywords

autonomous robots; legal issues; network robot systems; Privacy

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS ROBOT; EUROPEAN DIRECTIVE; LEGAL FRAMEWORKS; LEGAL ISSUES; MOBILITY MANAGEMENT; NETWORK ROBOT SYSTEMS; NETWORKED ROBOT; PRIVACY; PRIVACY COMPLIANCE; PRIVACY ISSUE; PRIVATE DATA; PRIVATE SPACES; SCANNING SENSORS; TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES; TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS; URBAN AREAS; WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM;

BLUETOOTH; COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; GLOBAL SYSTEM FOR MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; ROBOTS; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 77958599540     PISSN: 01691864     EISSN: 15685535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/016918610X527202     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. A. Rouvroy, Privacy, data protection, and the unprecedented challenges of ambient inteligence, in: Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology. Berkeley Electronic Press, Berkeley, CA (2008).
2. P. M. Asaro, What should we want from a robot ethic?, Int. Rev. Inform. Ethics 6, 9-16 (2006).
3. P. M. Asaro, Robots and responsibility from a legal perspective, http://www.peterasaro.org/writing/ASARO%20Legal%20Perspective.pdf
4. G. Schweitzer, Robotics - chances and challenges of a key science, presented at: 17th Int. Congr. Mechanical Engineering, São Paulo (2003). Available online at http://www.mcgs.ch/webcontent/Robotics.pdf
5. S. Lawrence, Legal personhood for artificial intelligences, N. Carolina L. Rev. 70, 1231 (1992).
6. P. McNally and S. Inayatullah, The rights of robots: technology, law and culture in the 21st century, Futures 20, 119-136 (1988).
7. A. Sanfeliu, A. Punsola, Y. Yoshimura, M. R. Llácer and M. D. Gramunt, Legal challenges for networking robot deployment in European urban areas: the privacy issue, presented at: Workshop on Network Robots Systems (IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation), Kobe (2009).
8. A. Sanfeliu, N. Hagita and A. Saffiotti, Network robot systems, Robotics Autonomous Syst. 56, 793-797 (2008).
9. J. Weinberg, Tracking RFID, ISJLP I/S 3, 811 (2007-2008).
10. A. Rouvroy and Y. Poullet, Self-determination as the 'key concept', presented at: Reinventing Data Protection: An International Conference, Brussels (2007).
11. Y. Poullet and A. Rouvroy, Ethique et droits de l'homme dans la société de l'information, Rapport général introductif à la session préparatoire organisée conjointement par l'UNESCO et le Conseil de l'Europe dans le cadre du suivi des SMSI (2008). Available online at http://crid.be/newsletter/UK/2008/Crid- Newsletter-July-August-September2008.htm
12. E. O'Neill, V. Kostakos, T. Kindberg, F. G. A. Schieck, A. Penn, D. Stanton, D. Fraser and T. Jones, Instrumenting the city: developing methods for observing and understanding the digital cityscape, in: Ubicomp 2006: 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, LNCS 4206, pp. 315-332. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).
13. Bundesverfassungsgericht, 15 December 1983, EuGRZ (1983).
14. H. T. Tavani, Philosophical theories of privacy: implications for an adequate online privacy policy, Metaphilosophy 38, 16 (2007).
15. M. Nagenborg, R. Capurro, J. Weber and C. Pingel, Ethical regulations on robotics in Europe, Artif. Intell. Soc. 22, 349-366 (2008).
16. J. R. Reidenberg, Lex informatica: the formulation of information policy rules through technology, Tex. L. Rev. 76, 553 (1997-1998).
17. J. E. Cohen, Examined lives: informational privacy and the subject as object, Stan. L. Rev. 52, 1428 (1999-2000).
18. L. M. Ulatowski, Recent developments in RFID technology: weighing utility against potential privacy concerns, ISJLP I/S (2007-2008).
19. L. Hildner, Defusing the threat of RFID: protecting consumer privacy through technology-specific legislation at the state level, Harv., C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 41, 165 (2006).
20. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission, Opinion on Ethical Aspects of ICT Implants in the Human Body, ec.europa.eu/european-group.../activities-en.htm
21. B. Hayes, Arming Big Brother. The EU's security research programme, TNI Briefing series, 2006/1, Transnational Institute, www.statewatch.org/analyses/ bigbrother.pdf
22. J. M. Schmidt, RFID and privacy: living in perfect harmony, Rutgers Comp. Tech. L. J. 34, 260 (2007-2008).
23. H. Nissenbaum, Privacy as contextual integrity, Wash. L. Rev. 79, 147-148 (2004).
24. A. Cavoukian, Privacy in the clouds, Identity Inform. Society 7, 89-108 (2009).
25. S. Rodotà, Discorso del presidente, Relazione 2004 (Garante per la Protezione dei dati personali), www.garanteprivacy.it
26. Commission of the European Communities, Green Paper Towards a New Culture for Urban Mobility, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM: 2007:0551:FIN:EN:PDF (2007).
27. Y. Yoshimura, E. González, A. Punsola, D. Andrés and F. Cárdenas, Tools for process modelling and decision-making, ICING document, ICING, Dublin (2008). Available online at http://www.fp6-project- icing.eu/
28. C. Colin and Y. Poullet, Observation society and marketing: case study, in: La autodeterminación informativa en la sociedad de la información y de la vigilancia, M. R. Llácer (Ed.). La Ley-Wolters Kluwer, Madrid (2011).
29. S. D. Warren and L. D. Brandeis, The right to privacy, Harvard L. Rev. 14, 193-220 (1890).