Ethical regulations on robotics in Europe

AI and Society

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 349-366

  Nagenborg, Michael ^a   Capurro, Rafael ^b   Weber, Jutta ^c   Pingel, Christoph ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

^b STUTTGART MEDIA UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^d Centre for Art and Media Technology   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS;

ARMED FORCES; ETHICAL ISSUES; TELEPRESENCE;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

EID: 43249119461     PISSN: 09515666     EISSN: 14355655     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00146-007-0153-y     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Allen C, Wallach W, Smit I (2006) Why machine ethics? In: IEEE Intelligent Systems, July/August 2006, pp 12–17
2. GD Baxter AF Monk K Doughty M Blythe G Gewsbury 2004 Standards and the dependability of electronic assistive technology S Keatas J Clarkson P Langdon P Robinson Designing a more inclusive world Springer London 247 256 Baxter GD, Monk AF, Doughty K, Blythe M, Gewsbury G (2004) Standards and the dependability of electronic assistive technology. In: Keatas S, Clarkson J, Langdon P, Robinson P (eds) Designing a more inclusive world. Springer, London, pp 247–256
3. Borking J (2006) Privacy rules—a steeple case for system architects. Position paper. w3c workshop on languages for privacy policy negotiation and semantics-driven enforcement, 17 and 18 October 2006, Ispra/Italy. http://www.w3.org/2006/07/privacy-ws/papers/04-borking-rules/
4. R Brooks 2001 Flesh and machines J Peter HG Denning The invisible future McGraw-Hill New York 57 63 Brooks R (2001) Flesh and machines. In: Peter J, Denning HG (eds) The invisible future. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 57–63
5. R Brooks 2002 Flesh and machines Pantheon New York Brooks R (2002) Flesh and machines. Pantheon, New York
6. T Christaller M Decker JM Gilsbach G Hirzinger KW Lauterbach E Schweighofer G Schweitzer D Sturma 2001 Robotik Springer Berlin Christaller T, Decker M, Gilsbach JM, Hirzinger G, Lauterbach KW, Schweighofer E, Schweitzer G, Sturma D (2001) Robotik. Perspektiven für menschliches Handeln in der zukünftigen Gesellschaft. Springer, Berlin
7. BM Dickens RJ Cook 2006 Legal and ethical issues in telemedicine and robotics Int J Gynecol Obstet 94 73 78 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.04.023 Dickens BM, Cook RJ (2006) Legal and ethical issues in telemedicine and robotics. Int J Gynecol Obstet 94:73–78
8. MD Diodato SM Prosad ME Klingensmith RJ Damiano 2004 Robotics in surgery. Curr probl surg 41 9 752 810 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2004.07.002 Diodato MD, Prosad SM, Klingensmith ME, Damiano RJ (2004) Robotics in surgery. Curr probl surg 41(9):752–810
9. L Floridi JW Sanders 2004 On the morality of artificial agents Minds Mach 14 3 349 379 10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d Floridi L, Sanders JW (2004) On the morality of artificial agents. Minds Mach 14(3):349–379
10. Freitas RA (1985) The legal rights of robots. In: Student lawyer 13 (Jan 1985), pp 54–56. Web version: http://www.rfreitas.com/Astro/LegalRightsOfRobots.htm
11. Ichbiah D (2005) Roboter. Geschichte—Technik—Entwicklung. München: Knesebeck
12. Kolovski V, James Hendler YJ, Tim Berners-Lee DW (2005) Towards a policy-aware web. http://www.csee.umbc.edu/swpw/papers/kolovski.pdf
13. Levy D (2006) Robots unlimited. A. K. Peters, MA
14. Rengeling/Szczekalla: Rengeling, Hans-Werner; Peter Szczekalla (2004) Grundrechte in der Europäischen Union. Charta der Grundrechte und Allgemeine Rechtsgrundsätze. Köln: Carl Heymanns Verlag
15. J Rosen 2004 The naked crowd Random House New York Rosen J (2004) The naked crowd. Random House, New York
16. Schräder P (2004) Roboterunterstützte Fräsverfahren am coxalen Femur bei Hüftgelenkstotalendoprothesenimplantation. Methodenbewertung am Beispiel “Robodoc ® ”. http://infomed.mds-ev.de/