Inhibited cell spreading on polystyrene nanopillars fabricated by nanoimprinting and in situ elongation

Nanotechnology

Volumn 21, Issue 38, 2010, Pages

  Hu, Walter ^a   Crouch, Adam S ^a   Miller, Danielle ^b   Aryal, Mukti ^a   Luebke, Kevin J ^b  

^a The University of Texas at Dallas   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANODIC ALUMINA MEMBRANES; BULK TISSUE; CELL BEHAVIORS; CELL MORPHOLOGY; CELL SPREADING; CELL-SUBSTRATE INTERACTIONS; CHEMICAL FACTORS; FOCAL ADHESIONS; HIGH DENSITY; HUMAN DERMAL FIBROBLASTS; IN-SITU; MICRON SCALE; NANO SCALE; NANO-IMPRINTING; NANO-PILLAR ARRAYS; NANO-POROUS; NANOPILLAR; NANOPILLARS; PHYSICAL FACTORS; PLASMA TREATMENT; SURFACE ENERGIES; SURFACE WETTABILITY; ULTRAHIGH ASPECT RATIO;

ASPECT RATIO; MOLDS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; PLASMA APPLICATIONS; POLYSTYRENES; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; TISSUE CULTURE;

CELL CULTURE;

EID: 77958584757     PISSN: 09574484     EISSN: 13616528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/38/385301     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Sniadecki N, Desai R, Ruiz S and Chen C 2006 Nanotechnology for cell-substrate interactions Ann. Biomed. Eng. 34 59-74
2. Davis S S 1997 Biomedical applications of nanotechnology-implications for drug targeting and gene therapy Trends Biotechnol. 15 217-24
3. Wen X, Shi D and Zhang N 2005 Applications of nanotechnology in tissue engineering Handbook of Nanostructured Biomaterials and their Applications in Nanobiotechnology vol 2 (Stevenson Ranch, CA: American Scientific Publishers) pp 393-414
4. Wagner V, Dullaart A, Bock A K and Zweck A 2006 The emerging nanomedicine landscape Nat. Biotechnol. 24 1211-7
5. Kwon J, Trivedi K, Krishnamurthy N V, Hu W, Lee J-B and Gimi B 2009 SU-8-based immunoisolative microcontainer with nanoslots defined by nanoimprint lithography J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 27 2795-800
6. Andersson A, Backhed F, Euler Av, Richter-Dahlfors A, Sutherland D and Kasemo B 2003 Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production Biomaterials 24 3427-36
7. Clark P, Connolly P, Curtis A, Dow J andWilkinson C 1991 Cell guidance by ultrafine topography in vitro J. Cell Sci. 99 73-7
8. Teixeira A, Abrams G, Murphy C and Nealey P 2003 Cell behavior on lithoographically defined nanostructured substrates J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 21 683-7
9. LoesbergW et al 2007 The threshold at which substrate nanogroove dimensions may influence fibroblast alignment and adhesion Biomaterials 28 3944-51
10. Hu W, Yim E, Reano R, Leong K and Pang S W 2005 Effects of nanoimprinted patterns in tissue-culture polystyrene on cell behavior J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 23 2984-9
11. 2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate Nano Lett. 7 1686-91
12. Crouch A S, Miller D, Luebke K J and Hu W 2009 Correlation of anisotropic cell behaviors with topographic aspect ratio Biomaterials 30 1560-7
13. Curtis A, Gadegaard N, Dalby M, Riehle M, Wilkinson C and Aitchison G 2004 Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 3 61-5
14. Dalby M, Riehle M, Sutherland D, Agheli H and Curtis A 2004 Changes in fibroblast morphology in response to nano-columns produced by colloidal lithography Biomaterials 25 5415-22 (Pubitemid 38586756)
15. Aryal M et al 2008 Imprinted large-scale high density polymer nanopillars for organic solar cells J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 26 2562-6
16. Tao L, Zhao X M, Gao J M and Hu W 2010 Lithographically defined uniform worm-shaped polymeric nanoparticles Nanotechnology 21 095301
17. Bico J, Thiele U and Quere D 2002 Wetting of textured surfaces Colloids Surf. A 206 41-6
18. Patankar N 2004 Mimicking the lotus effect: influence of double roughness structures and slender pillars Langmuir 20 8209-13
19. Jung Y and Bhushan B 2006 Contact angle, adhesion and friction properties of micro- and nanopatterned polymers for superhydrophobicity Nanotechnology 17 4970-80
20. Martines E, Seunarine K, Morgan H, Gadegaard N, Wilkinson C and Riehle M 2005 Superhydrophobicity and superhydrophilicity of regular nanopatterns Nano Lett. 2 2097-103
21. Cassie A and Baxter S 1944Wettability of porous surfaces Trans. Faraday Soc. 40 546-51
22. Krasteva N et al 2004 Influence of polymer membrane porosity on C3A hepatoblastoma cell adhesive interaction and function Biomaterials 25 2467-76
23. Curtis A andWilkinson C 1997 Topographical control of cells Biomaterials 18 1573-83
24. Kato M and Mrksich M 2004 Using model substrates to study the dependence of focal adhesion formation on the affinity of integrin-ligand complexes Biochemistry 43 2699-707
25. Berry C, Curtis A, Oreffo R, Agheli H and Sutherland D 2007 Human fibroblast and human bone marrow cell response to lithographically nanopatterned adhesive domains on protein rejecting substrates IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 6 201-9
26. Allen T 2006 Preparation and maintenance of single-cell micro-island cultures of basal forebrain neurons Nat. Protoc. 1 2543-50
27. Chen C, Ostuni E, Whitesides G and Ingber D 2000 Using self-assembled monolayers to pattern ECM proteins and cells on substrates Meth. Mol. Biol. 139 209-19
28. Wilkinson C, Curtis A and Crossan J 1998 Nanofabrication in celllular engineering J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16 3132-6