Plant stages with biotic, indirect defences are more palatable and suffer less herbivory than their undefended counterparts

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 101, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 536-543

  Llandres, Ana L ^a   Rodríguez Gironés, Miguel A ^a   Dirzo, Rodolfo ^b  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE ECOLOGÍA FUNCIONAL Y EVOLUTIVA   (Spain)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anti herbivore defences; Herbivore preference; Mexico; Mutualistic defenders; Plant ontogeny; Trade offs; Tropical dry forest

Indexed keywords

ANTIHERBIVORE DEFENSE; DEFENSE BEHAVIOR; DRY FOREST; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HERBIVORY; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; ONTOGENY; PALATABILITY; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; RECRUITMENT (POPULATION DYNAMICS); TRADE-OFF;

ANIMALIA; CORDIA; CORDIA ALLIODORA; CORDIA ELAEAGNOIDES; CROTON PSEUDONIVEUS; CROTON SUBEROSUS;

EID: 77958573614     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: 10958312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01521.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Agrawal AA. 2006. Macroevolution of plant defense strategies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22: 103-109.
2. Barton KE, Koricheva J. 2010. The ontogeny of plant defense and herbivory: characterizing general patterns using meta-analysis. American Naturalist 175: 481-493.
3. Boege K. 2004. Induced responses in three tropical dry forest plants species - direct and indirect effects on herbivory. Oikos 107: 541-548.
4. Boege K, Marquis RJ. 2005. Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 441-448.
5. Bryant JP, Reichardt PB, Clausen TP, Provenza FD, Kuropat PJ. 1992. Woody plant-mammal interactions. In: Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR, eds. Herbivores: their interactions with plant secondary metabolites. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 344-371.
6. Bullock SH. 1986. Climate of Chamela, Jalisco, and trends in the south coastal region of Mexico. Archives for Meteorology, Geophysics and Bioclimatology Series B 36: 297-316.
7. Chamberlain SA, Holland JN. 2009. Quantitative synthesis of context dependency in ant-plant protection mutualisms. Ecology 90: 2384-2392.
8. Collantes HG, Gianoli E, Niemeyer HM. 1997. Effect of defoliation on the patterns of allocation of a hydroxamic acid in rye (Secale cereale). Environmental and Experimental Botany 38: 231-235.
9. Cuautle M, Rico-Gray V. 2003. The effect of wasps and ants on the reproductive success of extrafloral nectaried plant Turnera ulmifolia (Turneraceae). Functional Ecology 17: 417-423.
10. Davison AC, Hinkley D. 2006. Bootstrap methods and their applications, 8th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics.
11. Del Val E, Dirzo R. 2003. Does ontogeny cause changes in the defensive strategies of the myrmecophyte Cecropia peltata? Plant Ecology 169: 35-41.
12. Del Val E, Dirzo R. 2004. Myrmecophily: plants with their own army. Interciencia 29: 673-677.
13. Di Giusto B, Anstett MC, Dounias E, McKey DB. 2001. Variation in the effectiveness of biotic defence: the case of an opportunistic ant-plant protection mutualism. Oecologia 129: 367-375.
14. Dirzo R. 1980. Experimental studies on slug-plant interactions. I. The acceptability of thirty plant species to the slug Agriolimax caruanae. Journal of Ecology 68: 981-998.
15. Dirzo R, Domínguez CA. 1995. Plant-herbivore interactions in Mesoamerican tropical dry forests. In: Bullock SH, Medina E, Mooney HA, eds. Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 304-325.
16. Domínguez CA, Dirzo R, Bullock SH. 1989. On the function of floral nectar in Croton suberosus (Euphorbiaceae). Oikos 56: 109-114.
17. Dyer LA, Letourneau DK, Dodson CD, Tobler MA, Stireman JO, Hsu A. 2004. Ecological causes and consequences of variation in defensive chemistry of a Neotropical shrub. Ecology 85: 2795-2803.
18. Eck G, Fiala B, Linsenmair KE, Hashim RB, Proksch P. 2001. Trade off between chemical and biotic anti-herbivore defense in the Southeast Asian plant genus Macaranga. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27: 1979-1996.
19. Fiala B, Grunsky H, Maschwitz U, Linsenmair KE. 1994. Diversity of ant-plant interactions - protective efficacy in Macaranga species with different degrees of ant association. Oecologia 97: 186-192.
20. Fiala B, Maschwitz U. 1992. Food bodies and their significance for obligate ant-association in the tree genus Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 110: 61-75.
21. Gaume L, McKey D, Terrin S. 1998. Ant-plant-homopteran mutualism: how the third partner affects the interaction between a plant-specialist ant and its myrmecophyte host. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London. Series B 265: 569-575.
22. Goralka RJL, Langenheim JH. 1996. Implications of foliar monoterpenoid variation among ontogenetic stages of California bay tree (Umbellularia californica) for deer herbivory. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 24: 13-23.
23. Goralka RJL, Schumaker MA, Langenheim JH. 1996. Variation in chemical and physical properties during leaf development in California bay tree (Umbellularia californica): predictors regarding palatability for deer. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 24: 93-103.
24. Gowda JH, Albrectsen BR, Ball JP, Sjöberg M, Palo RT. 2003. Spines as a mechanical defence: the effects of fertiliser treatment on juvenile Acacia tortilis plants. International Journal of Ecology 24: 1-4.
25. Heil M, Delsinne T, Hilpert A, Schürkens S, Andary C, Linsenmair KE, Sousa SM, McKey D. 2002. Reduced chemical defence in ant-plants? A critical re-evaluation of a widely accepted hypothesis. Oikos 99: 457-468.
26. Heil M, Fiala B, Boller T, Linsenmair KE. 1999. Reduced chitinase activities in ant plants of the genus Macaranga. Naturwissenschaften 86: 146-149.
27. Heil M, McKey D. 2003. Protective ant-plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 425-453.
28. Heil M, Staehelin C, McKey D. 2000. Low chitinase activity in Acacia myrmecophytes: a potential trade-off between biotic and chemical defences? Naturwissenschaften 87: 555-558.
29. Herms DA, Mattson WJ. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 283-335.
30. Janzen DH. 1966. Coevolution of mutualism between ants and Acacias in Central America. Evolution 20: 249-275.
31. Janzen DH. 1969. Allelopathy by mirmecophytes: the ant Azteca as an allelopathic agent of Cecropia. Ecology 50: 147-153.
32. Johnson KS. 1999. Comparative detoxification of plant (Magnolia virginiana) allelochemicals by generalist and specialist Saturniid silkmoths. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25: 253-269.
33. Kost C, Heil M. 2005. Increased availability of extrafloral nectar reduces herbivory in Lima bean plants (Phaseolus lunatus, Fabaceae). Basic and Applied Ecology 6: 237-248.
34. Lima SL, Dill LM. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 619-640.
35. Longino JT. 1996. Taxonomic characterization of some live-stem inhabiting Azteca (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Costa Rica, with special reference to the ants of Cordia (Boraginaceae) and Triplaris (Polygonaceae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 5: 131-156.
36. Madden D, Young TP. 1992. Symbiotic ants as an alternative defense against giraffe herbivory in spinescent Acacia drepanolobium. Oecologia 91: 235-238.
37. Nomura M, Itioka T, Itino T. 2000. Variations in abiotic defense within myrmecophytic and non-myrmecophytic species of Macaranga in a Bornean dipterocarp forest. Ecological Research 15: 1-11.
38. Nomura M, Itioka T, Murase K. 2001. Non-ant antiherbivore defenses before plant-ant colonization in Macaranga myrmecophytes. Population Ecology 43: 207-212.
39. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
40. Rasband W. 2003. Image J. 1.30. National Institutes of Health. Available at
41. Rehr SS, Feeny PP, Janzen DH. 1973. Chemical defence in Central American non-ant Acacias. Journal of Animal Ecology 42: 405-416.
42. Rocha CFD, Bergallo HG. 1992. Bigger ant colonies reduce herbivory and herbivore residence time on leaves of an ant-plant Azteca muelleri vs Coelomera ruficornis on Cecropia pachystachya. Oecologia 91: 249-252.
43. Rohde S, Molis M, Wahl M. 2004. Regulation of anti-herbivore defence by Fucus vesiculosus in response to various cues. Journal of Ecology 92: 1011-1018.
44. Rosumek FB, Silveira FAO, Neves FS, Barbosa NPU, Diniz L, Oki Y, Pezzini F, Fernandes GW, Cornelissen T. 2009. Ants on plants: a meta-analysis of the role of ants as plant biotic defenses. Oecologia 160: 537-549.
45. Rudgers JA, Strauss SY, Wendel JF. 2004. Trade-offs among anti-herbivore resistance traits: insights from Gossypieae (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 91: 871-880.
46. Schemske DW. 1980. The evolutionary significance of extrafloral nectar production by Costus woodsonii (Zingiberaceae) - an experimental analysis of ant protection. Journal of Ecology 68: 959-967.
47. Schupp EW. 1986. Azteca protection of Cecropia: ant occupation benefits juvenile trees. Oecologia 70: 379-385.
48. Simpson SJ, Raubenheimer D. 2001. The geometric analysis of nutrient-allelochemical interactions: a case study using locusts. Ecology 82: 422-439.
49. Steward JL, Keeler KH. 1988. Are there trade-offs among antiherbivore defenses in Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae)? Oikos 53: 79-68.
50. Stoner KE. 2005. Phyllostomid bat community structure and abundance in two contrasting tropical dry forests. Biotropica 37: 591-599.
51. Thomson GL. 1991. A note on the rank transform for interactions. Biometrika 78: 697-701.
52. Tillberg CV. 2004. Friend or foe? A behavioral and stable isotopic investigation of an ant-plant symbiosis. Oecologia 140: 506-515.
53. Trager MD, Bruna EM. 2006. Effects of plant age, experimental nutrient addition and ant occupancy on herbivory in a neotropical myrmecophyte. Journal of Ecology 94: 1156-1163.
54. Wadleigh RW, Yu SJ. 1988. Detoxification of isothiocyanate allelochemicals by glutathione transferase in three lepidopterous species. Journal of Chemical Ecology 14: 1279-1284.
55. Webber BL, Moog J, Curtis ASO, Woodrow IE. 2007. The diversity of ant-plant interactions in the rainforest understorey tree, Ryparosa (Achariaceae): food bodies, domatia, prostomata and hemipteran trophobionts. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 254: 353-371.
56. Yu SJ. 1987. Microsomal oxidation of allelochemicals in generalist (Spodoptera frugiperda) and semispecialist (Anticarsia gemmatalis). Journal of Chemical Ecology 13: 423-436.