Co-culture of the sea urchin paracentrotus lividus and the edible mussel mytilus edulis L. on the West Coast of Scotland, United Kingdom

Journal of Shellfish Research

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 553-559

  Cook, E J ^a   Kelly, M S ^a  

^a SCOTTISH MARINE INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

blue mussel; co culture; Mytilus edulis; Paracentrotus lividus; sea urchin

Indexed keywords

ECHINOIDEA; LAMINARIA; MYTILUS EDULIS; PARACENTROTUS; PARACENTROTUS LIVIDUS;

EID: 77958566833     PISSN: 07308000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2983/035.028.0318     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agatsuma, Y. 1998. Aquaculture of the sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus nudus) transplanted from coralline flats in Hokkaido, Japan. J. ShellfishRes. 17:1541-1547.
2. Boudouresque, C. F. & M. Verlaque. 2007. Ecology of Paracentrotus lividus. In: Lawrence, J. M. (Ed.), Edible sea urchins: biology and ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 243-285.
3. Bridger, C. J., R. G. Hooper & T. J. McKeever. 1998. Pilot-scale commercial sea urchin roe enhancement: Ocean corral trials. Bull. Aquacult. Assoc. Can. 98:99-101.
4. Briscoe, C. S. & K. P. Sebens. 1988. Omnivory in Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (Muller) (Echinodermata, Echinoidea): Predation on subtidalmussels. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 115:1-24.
5. Byrne, M. 1990. Annual reproductive cycles of the commercial sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus from an exposed intertidal and a sheltered subtidal habitat on the west coast of Scotland. Mar. Biol. 104:275-289.
6. Cook, E. J. 1999. Psammechinus miliaris (Gmelin). Factors affecting its somatic growth and development, and its suitability as a species for sea urchin cultivation. PhD Thesis. Edinburgh: Napier University. pp. 168.
7. Cook, E. J. & M. S. Kelly. 2007a. Enhanced production of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus in integrated open-water cultivation with Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Aquaculture 273:573-585.
8. Cook, E. J. & M. S. Kelly. 2007b. Effectofvariationintheproteinvalue of the red macroalga Palmaria palmata on the feeding and growth of the sea urchins Psammechinus miliaris and Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata). Aquaculture 270:207-217.
9. Cook, E. J., M. S. Kelly & J. D. McKenzie. 1998. Somatic and gonadal growth of the sea urchin Psammechinus miliaris (Gmelin) fed artificial salmon feed compared with a macroalgal diet. J. Shellfish Res. 17:1549-1555.
10. Cuthbert, F. M., R. G. Hooper & T. McKeever. 1995. Sea urchin Aquaculture Phase I: sea urchin feeding and ranching experiments. In: Government of Newfoundland, editors. Canadian Centre for Fisheries Innovation. Report No. AUI-503.
11. Fernandez, C. & C. F. Boudouresque. 2000. Nutrition of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) fed different artificial food. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 204:131-141.
12. Fernandez, C. M. & A. Caltagirone. 1994. Growth rate of adult Paracentrotus lividus in a lagoon environment: the effect ofdifferent diet types. In: B. David, A. Guille, J. P. Feral, M. Roux, editors, Echinoderms through time. Rotterdam: Balkema. pp. 655-660.
13. Frantzis, A. & A. Gremare. 1992. Ingestion, absorption, and growth rates of Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) fed differentmacrophytes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 95:169-183.
14. Grosjean, P., C. Spirlet, P. Gosselin, D. Vaitilingon & M. Jangoux. 1998. Land-based, closed-cycle echiniculture of Paracentrotus liv-idus (Lamarck) (Echinoldea: Echinodermata): A long-term experi-ment at a pilot scale. J. Shellfish Res. 17:1523-1531.
15. Hagen, N. T. 1996. Echinoculture: From fishery enhancement to closed cyclecultivation. WorldAquacult. 27:6-19.
16. Haya, D. & M. B. Regis. 1995. Comportement trophique de Para-centrotus lividus (Lam.) (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) soumis a six regimes alimentaires dans des conditions experimentales. Mesogée 54:35-42.
17. James, P. J. 2006. A comparison of roe enhancement of the sea urchin Evechinus chloroticus in sea-based and land-based cages. Aquacul-ture 253:290-300.
18. Kelly, M. S. 2004. Sea urchin aquaculture: a review and outlook. In: Munchen-Heinzeller, Nebelsick, editors. Echinoderms. London: Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 283-289.
19. Kelly, M. S., C. C. Brodie & J. D. McKenzie. 1998. Somatic and gonadal growth of the sea urchin Psammechinus miliaris (Gmelin) maintained in polyculture with the Atlantic salmon. J. Shellfish Res. 17:1557-1562.
20. Liu, H., M. S. Kelly, E. J. Cook, K. D. Black, H. Orr, J. X. Zhu & S. L. Dong. 2007a. The effect of diet type on growth and fatty acid composition of the sea urchin larvae, II. Psammechinus miliaris (Gmelin). Aquaculture 264:263-278. (Pubitemid 46365809)
21. Liu, H., M. S. Kelly, E. J. Cook, K. D. Black, H. Orr, J. X. Zhu & S. L. Dong. 2007b. The effect of diet type on growth and fatty acid composition of sea urchin larvae, I. Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck, 1816) (Echinodermata). Aquaculture 264:247-262. (Pubitemid 46365808)
22. McDermid, K. J. & B. Stuercke. 2003. Nutritional composition ofedible Hawaiianseaweeds. J. Appl. Phycol. 15:513-524.
23. Meidel, S. K. & R. E. Scheibling. 1999. Effects offood type and ration on reproductive maturation and growth of the sea urchin Strong-ylocentrotus droebachiensis. Mar. Biol. 134:155-166.
24. Mendes, C. & R. Becarra. 2004. Cultivation ofLoxechinus albus in lantern nets. In: J. M. Lawrence, O. Guzman, editors. Sea urchin fisheries and ecology. Lancaster, USA: DEStech Publications. pp. 374.
25. Moylan, E. 1997. Gonad conditioning and wild stock enhancement of the purple sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus on the west coast of Ireland. Bull. Aquacult. Assoc. Can. 97:38-45.
26. Otero-Villanueva, M. D. M., M. S. Kelly & G Burnell. 2006. How prey size, type and abundance affects foraging decisions by the regular echinoidPsammechinusmiliaris. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK. 86:773-781.
27. Robinson, S. M. & L. Colborne. 1997. Enhancing roe of the green sea urchin using an artificial food source. Bull. Aquacult. Assoc. Can. 97:14-20.
28. Robinson, S. M. C., J. D. Castell & E. J. Kennedy. 2002. Developing suitable colour in the gonads of cultured green sea urchins (Strong-ylocentrotus droebachiensis). Aquaculture 206:289-303.
29. Scheibling, R. E. & B. G Hatcher. 2007. Ecology of Stronglyocentrotus droebachiensis. In: J. M. Lawrence, editors. Edible sea urchins: biology and ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 353-392.
30. Schlosser, S. C., I. Lupatsch, J. M. Lawrence, A. L. Lawrence & M. Shpigel. 2005. Protein and energy digestibility and gonad develop-ment of the European sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) fed algal and prepared diets during spring and fall. Aquacult. Res. 36:972-982.
31. Shpigel, M., S. C. McBride, S. Marciano & I. Lupatsch. 2004. Propagation of the European sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus in Israel. In: J. M. Lawrence, O. Guzman, editors. Sea urchins: fisheries andaquaculture. Pennsylvania: DES tech publications. pp. 386.
32. Symonds, R. C., M. S. Kelly, C. Caris-Veyrat & A. J. Young. 2007. Carotenoids in the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus: occurrence of 9'-cis-echinenone as the dominant carotenoid in gonad colour determination. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 148:432-444.
33. Underwood, A. J. 1997. Experimentsin ecology: their logical designand interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 522 pp.
34. Vadas, R. L., B. Beal, T. Dowling & J. C. Fegley. 2000. Experimentalfield tests ofnatural algal diets on gonad index and quality in the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis: a case for rapid summer productioninpost-spawned animals. Aquaculture 182:115-135.
35. Verlaque, M. & H. Nedelec 1983. Biologie de Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) sur substrat rocheux en Corse (Mediterranee, France): alimentation des adultes. Vie Milieu 33:191-201.