Effects of polyandry on male phenotypic diversity

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2442-2452

  Barbosa, M ^a   Dornelas, M ^b,c   Magurran, A E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Evolution; Phenotypic diversity; Sexual selection; Sexual traits

Indexed keywords

CYPRINID; FITNESS; MALE BEHAVIOR; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; POLYANDRY; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; FEMALE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; PIGMENTATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; FEMALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE; PIGMENTATION; POECILIA; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO;

EID: 77958560704     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02105.x     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Anderson, M.J. 2006. Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62: 245-253.
2. Andersson, M. & Simmons, L.W. 2006. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 296-302.
3. Arnqvist, G. 1998. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Nature 393: 784-786.
4. Barrett, S.C.H. 2002. The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nature Rev. Genet. 3: 274-284.
5. Birkhead, T.R. & Møller, A.P. 1998. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection. Academic Press, London.
6. Birkhead, T.R. & Pizzari, T. 2002. Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nature Rev. Genet. 3: 262-273.
7. Brooks, R. 2002. Variation in female mate choice within guppy populations: population divergence, multiple ornaments and the maintenance of polymorphism. Genetica 116: 343-358.
8. Brooks, R. & Couldridge, V. 1999. Multiple sexual ornaments co-evolve with multiple mating preferences. Am. Nat. 154: 37-45.
9. Brooks, R. & Endler, J.A. 2001a. Direct and indirect sexual selection and quantitative genetics of male traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 55: 1002-1015.
10. Brooks, R. & Endler, J.A. 2001b. Female guppies agree to differ: Phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection. Evolution 55: 1644-1655.
11. Clarke, K.R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18: 117-143.
12. Cornell, S.J. & Tregenza, T. 2007. A new theory for the evolution of polyandry as a means of inbreeding avoidance. Proc. R. Soc. B 274: 2873-2879.
13. Crean, A.J. & Marshall, D.J. 2009. Coping with environmental uncertainty: dynamic bet hedging as a maternal effect. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 364: 1087-1096.
14. Eakley, A.L. & Houde, A.E. 2004. Possible role of female discrimination against 'redundant' males in the evolution of colour pattern polymorphism in guppies. Biol. Lett. 271: S299-S301.
15. Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, NJ.
16. Ellner, S. & Hairston, N.G. Jr 1994. Role of overlapping generations in maintaining genetic variation in a fluctuating environment. Am. Nat. 143: 403-417.
17. Endler, J.A. 1980. Natural selection on colour patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34: 76-91.
18. Endler, J.A. 1983. Natural and Sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish 9: 173-190.
19. Evans, J.P. & Magurran, A.E. 2000. Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. PNAS 97: 10074-10076.
20. Evans, J.P. & Simmons, L.W. 2008. The genetic basis of traits regulating sperm competition and polyandry: can selection favour the evolution of good- and sexy sperm? Genetica 134: 5-19.
21. Evans, J.P., Zane, L., Francescato, S. & Pilastro, A. 2003. Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination. Nature 421: 360-363.
22. Evans, J.P., Kelley, J.L., Bisazza, A., Finazzo, E. & Pilastro, A. 2004a. Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies. Proc. R. Soc. B 271: 2035-2042.
23. Evans, J.P., Bisazza, A. & Pilastro, A. 2004b. Female mating preferences for colourful males in a population of guppies subject to high predation. J. Fish Biol. 65: 1154-1159.
24. Farr, J.A. 1977. Male rarity or novelty, female choice behavior, and sexual selection in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata, Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Evolution 31: 162-168.
25. Fox, C.W. & Rauter, C.M. 2003. Bet-hedging and the evolution of multiple mating. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5: 273-286.
26. Gower, J.C. 1971. A General Coefficient of Similarity and Some of Its Properties. Biometrics. 27: 857-871.
27. Grether, G.F., Hudon, J. & Endler, J.A. 2001. Carotenoid scarcity, synthetic pteridine pigments and the evolution of sexual coloration in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Proc. R. Soc. B 268: 1245-1253.
28. Halliday, T.R. 1983. The study of mate choice. In: Mate Choice, Vol. 1 (P. Bateson, ed), pp. 462. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
29. Haskins, C.P., Haskins, E.F., McLaughlin, J.J. & Hewitt, R.E. 1961. Polymorphism and population structure in Lebistes reticulatus, a population study. In: Vertebrate Speciation (W.F. Blair, ed), pp. 320-395. University of Texas Press, Texas.
30. Head, M.L., Hunt, J., Jennions, M.D. & Brooks, R. 2005. The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. PLoS Biol. 3: 289-294.
31. Hoffmann, M., Tripathi, N., Henz, S.R., Lindholm, A.K., Weigel, D., Breden, F. & Dreyer, C. 2007. Opsin gene duplication and diversification in the guppy, a model for sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. B 274: 33-42.
32. Houde, A.E. 1992. Sex-linked heritability of a sexually selected character in a natural population of Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae) (guppies). Heredity 69: 229-235.
33. Houde, A.E. & Endler, J.A. 1990. Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male colour patterns in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science 248: 1405-1408.
34. Hughes, K.A., Du, L., Rodd, F.H. & Reznick, D.N. 1999. Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Anim. Behav. 58: 907-916.
35. Jennions, M.D. & Petrie, M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75: 21-64.
36. Keller, L. & Reeve, H.K. 1995. Why females mate with multiple males? The sexuality selected sperm hypothesis. Adv. Stud. Behav. 24: 291-315.
37. Keller, L.F. & Walker, D.M. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 230-241.
38. Kelley, J.L., Graves, J.A. & Magurran, A.E. 1999. Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies. Nature 401: 661-662.
39. Kirkpatrick, M. 1996. Good genes and direct selection in evolution of mating preferences. Evolution 50: 2125-2140.
40. Kodric-Brown, A. 1989. Dietary carotenoids and male mating success in the guppy: an environmental component to female choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 393-401.
41. Kussell, E. & Leibler, S. 2005. Phenotypic diversity, population growth, and information in fluctuating environments. Science 309: 2075-2078.
42. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. PNAS 78: 3721-3725.
43. Legendre, L. & Legendre, P. 1983. Numerical Ecology. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
44. Magurran, A.E. 2001. Sexual conflict and evolution in Trinidadian guppies. Genetica 112: 463-474.
45. Marshall, D.J. & Keough, M.J. 2009. Does Interspecific competition affect offspring provisioning? Ecology 90: 487-495.
46. Marshall, D.J. & Uller, T. 2007. When is a maternal effect adaptive? Oikos 116: 1957-1963.
47. Marshall, D.J., Bonduriansky, R. & Bussiere, L.F. 2008. Offspring size as a maternal bet-hedging strategy in unpredictable environments. Ecology 89: 2506-2517.
48. Mattila, H.R. & Seeley, T.D. 2007. Genetic diversity in honey bee colonies enhances productivity and fitness. Science 317: 362-364.
49. Maynard-Smith, J. 1991. Models of female choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 146-151.
50. Ojanguren, A.F., Evans, J.P. & Magurran, A.E. 2005. Multiple mating influences offspring size in guppies. J. Fish Biol. 67: 1184-1188.
51. Oksanen, J., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., O'Hara, B., Simpson, G.L. & Stevens, M.H.H. 2008. in: R Package Version. Community Ecology Package, Vegan.
52. Van Oosterhout, C., Trigg, R.E., Carvalho, G.R., Magurran, A.E., Hauser, L. & Shaw, P.W. 2003. Inbreeding depression and genetic load of sexually selected traits: how the guppy losts its spots. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 273-281.
53. Parker, G.A. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45: 525-567.
54. Parker, G.A. 1998. Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (T. Birkhead & A. Møller, eds), pp. 3-54. Academic Press, San Diego.
55. Pilastro, A., Evans, J.P., Sartorelli, S. & Bisazza, A. 2002. Male phenotype predicts insemination success in guppies. Proc. R. Soc. B 269: 1325-1330.
56. Pilastro, A., Simonato, M., Bisazza, A. & Evans, J.P. 2004. Cryptic female preference for colorful males in guppies. Evolution 58: 665-669.
57. Pitcher, T.E., Neff, B.D., Rodd, F.H. & Rowe, L. 2003. Multiple mating and sequential mate choice in guppies: females trade up. Proc. R. Soc. B 270: 1623-1629.
58. Pitcher, T.E., Rodd, H.F. & Rowe, L. 2008. Female choice and the relatedness of mates in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Mate choice and inbreeding depression. Genetica 134: 137-146.
59. Pomiankowski, A. & Møller, A.P. 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. B 260: 21-29.
60. Quinn, G.P. & Keough, M.J. 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
61. R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
62. Reid, J.M. 2007. Secondary sexual ornamentation and non-additive genetic benefits of female mate choice. Proc. R. Soc. B 274: 1395-1402.
63. Rubenstein, D.R. 2007. Female extrapair mate choice in a cooperative breeder: trading sex for help and increasing offspring heterozygosity. Proc. R. Soc. B 274: 1895-1903.
64. Sappington, T.W. & Taylor, O.R. 1990. Disruptive sexual selection in Colias eurytheme butterflies (pheromone variation/aflanes/courtship). PNAS 87: 6132-6134.
65. Seehausen, O. & Van Alphen, J.J.M. 1999. Can sympatric speciation by disruptive sexual selection explain rapid evolution of cichlid diversity in Lake Victoria? Ecol. Lett. 2: 262-271.
66. Sherman, P.W. 1988. Parasites, pathogens, and polyandry in social hymenoptera. Am. Nat. 131: 602-610.
67. Simmons, L.W. 2005. The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36: 125-146.
68. Smith, E.J., Partridge, J.C., Parsons, K.N., White, E.M., Cuthill, I.C., Bennett, A.T.D. & Church, S.C. 2002. Ultraviolet vision and mate choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav. Ecol. 13: 11-19.
69. Tilman, D., Lehman, C.L. & Bristow, C.E. 1998. Diversity-Stability Relationships: statistical inevitability or ecological consequence? Am. Nat. 151: 277-292.
70. Tregenza, T. & Wedell, N. 1998. Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52: 1726-1730.
71. Weatherhead, P.J. & Robertson, R.J. 1979. Offspring quality and the polygyny threshold - Sexy Son hypothesis. Am. Nat. 113: 201-208.
72. Winge, O. 1927. The location of eighteen genes in Lebistes reticulatus. J. Genet. 18: 1-43.
73. Yasui, Y. 1998. The 'genetic benefits' of female multiple mating reconsidered. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 246-250.
74. Zeh, J.A. & Zeh, D.W. 1996. Evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. B 263: 1711-1717.