Variation in female mate choice within guppy populations: Population divergence, multiple ornaments and the maintenance of polymorphism

Genetica

Volumn 116, Issue 2-3, 2002, Pages 343-358

  Brooks, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Frequency dependence; Guppy; Heritability; Mate choice; Polymorphism; Preference; Repeatability; Speciation; Variation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; FEMALE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MALE; PIGMENTATION; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; MALE; PIGMENTATION; POECILIA; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ANIMALIA; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; POECILIA RETICULATA;

EID: 0036873619     PISSN: 00166707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021228308636     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Andersson, M., 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Badyaev, A.V., G.E. Hill, P.O. Dunn & J.C. Glen, 2001. Plumage color as a composite trait: developmental and functional integration of sexual ornamentation. Am. Nat. 158: 221-235.
3. Baerends, G.P., R. Brouwer & H.T.J. Waterbolk, 1955. Ethological studies on Lebistes reticulatus (Peters). 1. An analysis of the male courtship pattern. Behaviour 8: 249-334.
4. Bakker, T.C.M. & A. Pomiankowski, 1995. The genetic basis of female mate preferences. J. Evol. Biol. 8: 129-171.
5. Barton, N.H. & M. Turelli, 1989. Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know. Annu. Rev. Genet. 23: 337-370.
6. Becher, S.A. & A.E. Magurran, 2000. Gene flow in Trinidadian guppies. J. Fish Biol. 56: 241-249.
7. Boake, C.R.B., 1989. Repeatability: its role in evolutionary studies of mating behaviour. Evol. Ecol. 3: 173-182.
8. Bond, A.B. & A.C. Kamil, 1998. Apostatic selection by blue jays produces balanced polymorphism in virtual prey. Nature 395: 594-596.
9. Boughman, J.W., 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411: 944-947.
10. Breden, F. & K. Hornaday, 1994. Test of indirect models of selection in the Trinidad guppy. Heredity 73: 291-297.
11. Brooks, R., 1996. Copying and the repeatability of mate choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39: 323-329.
12. Brooks, R., 2000. Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature 406: 67-70.
13. Brooks, R. & N. Caithness, 1995. Female choice in a feral guppy population: are there multiple cues? Anim. Behav. 50: 301-307.
14. Brooks, R. & V. Couldridge, 1999. Multiple sexual ornaments coevolve with multiple mating preferences. Am. Nat. 154: 37-45.
15. Brooks, R. & J.A. Endler, 2001a. Direct and indirect sexual selection and quantitative genetics of male traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 55: 1002-1015.
16. Brooks, R. & J.A. Endler, 2001b. Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behaviour and the consequences for sexual selection. Evolution 55: 1644-1655.
17. Crow, R.T. & N.R. Liley, 1979. A sexual pheromone in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Peters). Can. J. Zoo. 57: 184-188.
18. Endler, J.A., 1978. A predator's view of animal colour patterns. Evol. Biol. 11: 319-364.
19. Endler, J.A., 1980. Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34: 76-91.
20. Endler, J.A., 1983. Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environ. Biol. Fishes 9: 173-190.
21. Endler, J.A., 1987. Predation, light intensity and courtship behaviour in Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Anim. Behav. 35: 1376-1385.
22. Endler, J.A., 1991. Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions. Vision Res. 31: 587-608.
23. Endler, J.A., 1992. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 139: S125-S153.
24. Endler, J.A., 1993. Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 340: 215-225.
25. Endler, J.A., 1995. Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 22-29.
26. Endler, J.A. & A. Basolo, 1998. Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 415-420.
27. Endler, J.A. & A.E. Houde, 1995. Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49: 456-468.
28. Endler, J.A., D. Westcott, J. Madden & T. Robson, unpub. ms. Innovation and signal efficiency affect the outcome of sexual selection in bowerbirds but elaboration does not.
29. Evans, J.P. & A.E. Magurran, 2000. Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 10074-10076.
30. Fajen, A. & F. Breden, 1992. Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation among natural populations of the Trinidad guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 46: 1457-1465.
31. Falconer, D.S. & T.F.C. Mackay, 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, New York, 4th edn.
32. Farr, J.A., 1977. Male rarity or novelty, female choice behaviour, and sexual selection in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Evolution 31: 162-168.
33. Farr, J.A., 1980. Social behavior patterns as determinants of reproductive success in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae). An experimental study of the effects of intermale competition, female choice, and sexual selection. Behaviour 74: 38-91.
34. Farr, J.A. & K. Peters, 1984. The inheritance of quantitative fitness traits in guppies, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae): tests for inbreeding effects. Heredity 52: 285-296.
35. Fisher, R.A., 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
36. Gamble, S.L., 2001. The Effect of Ambient Light Spectra in Male Mating Strategies and Female Response in the Guppy. The University of New South Wales, Sydney.
37. Glanville, P.W. & J.A. Allen, 1997. Protective polymorphism in populations of computer-simulated moth-like prey. Oikos 80: 565-571.
38. Godin, J.J. & L.A. Dugatkin, 1995. Variability and repeatability of female mating preference in the guppy. Anim. Behav. 49: 1427-1433.
39. Gray, D.A. & W.H. Cade, 2000. Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 14449-14454.
40. Gray, D.A. & W.H. Cade, 1999. Correlated-response-to-selection experiments designed to test for a genetic correlation between female preferences and male traits yeild biased results. Anim Behav. 58: 1325-1327.
41. Grether, G.F., J. Hudon & D.F. Millie, 1999. Carotenoid limitation of sexual coloration along an environmental gradient in guppies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 266: 1317-1322.
42. Guilford, T. & M. Stamp Dawkins, 1991. Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Anim. Behav. 42: 1-14.
43. Haskins, C.P. & E.F. Haskins, 1961. Polymorphism and population structure in Lebistes reticulatus, pp. 320-395 in Vertebrate Speciation, edited by W.F. Blair. University of Texas Press, Austin.
44. Hoffmann, A.A., 1999. Is the heritability for courtship and mating speed in Drosophila (fruit fly) low? Heredity 82: 158-162.
45. Houde, A.E., 1992. Sex-linked heritability of a sexually selected character in a natural population of Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae) (guppies). Heredity 69: 229-235.
46. Houde, A.E., 1994. Effect of artificial selection on male colour patterns on mating preference of female guppies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 256: 125-130.
47. Houde, A.E., 1997. Sex, Color and Mate Choice in Guppies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
48. Houde, A.E. & J.A. Endler, 1990. Correlated evolution of female mating preferences and male color patterns in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science 248: 1405-1408.
49. Hughes, K.A., L. Du, F.H. Rodd & D.N. Reznick, 1999. Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim. Behav. 58: 907-916.
50. Jennions, M.D. & M. Petrie, 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 72: 283-327.
51. Johnstone, R.A., 1995. Honest advertisement of multiple qualities using multiple signals. J. Theor. Biol. 177: 87-94.
52. Johnstone, R.A., 1996. Multiple displays in animal communication: 'backup signals' and 'multiple messages'. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 351: 329-338.
53. Karino, K. & Y. Haijima, 2001. Heritability of male secondary sexual traits in feral guppies in Japan. J. Ethol. 19: 33-37.
54. Kelley, J.L., J.A. Graves & A.E. Magurran, 1999. Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies. Nature 401: 661.
55. Kelly, C.D., J.-G.J. Godin & J.M. Wright, 1999. Geographical variation in multiple paternity within natural populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 266: 2403-2408.
56. Kirkpatrick, M. & M.J. Ryan, 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350: 33-38.
57. Kodric-Brown, A. & P.F. Nicoletto, 1997. Repeatability of female choice in the guppy: response to live and videotaped males. Anim. Behav. 54: 369-376.
58. Kotiaho, J.S., L.W. Simmons & J.L. Tomkins, 2001. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410: 684-686.
59. Lande, R., 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721-3725.
60. Liley, N.R., 1966. Ethological isolating mechanisms in four sympatric species of poeciliid fishes. Behaviour 13(suppl.): 1-197.
61. Magurran, A.E., 1998. Population differentiation without speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 353: 275-286.
62. Matthews, I.M. & A.E. Magurran, 2000. Evidence for sperm transfer during sneaky mating in wild Trinidadian guppies. J. Fish Biol. 56: 1381-1386.
63. Maynard Smith, J., 1998. Evolutionary Genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
64. Møller, A.P. & A. Pomiankowski, 1993. Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32: 167-176.
65. Moore, A.J. & P.J. Moore, 1999. Balancing sexual selection through opposing mate choice and male competition. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 266: 711-716.
66. Panhuis, T.M., R.K. Butlin, M. Zuk & T. Tregenza, 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 325-413.
67. Partridge, L., 1988. The rare-male effect; what is its evolutionary significance? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 319: 525-539.
68. Partridge, L., 1989. Frequency-dependent mating preferences in female fruitflies? Behav. Genet. 19: 725-728.
69. Partridge, L. & W.G. Hill, 1984. Mechanisms for frequency-dependent mating success. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 23: 113-132.
70. Pomiankowski, A. & Y. Iwasa, 1993. Evolution of multiple sexual preferences by Fisher's runaway process of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser B 253: 173-181.
71. Pomiankowski, A. & Y. Iwasa, 1998. Runaway ornament diversity caused by Fisherian sexual selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 5106-5111.
72. Pomiankowski, A. & A.P. Møller, 1995. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 260: 21-29.
73. Pomiankowski, A. & L. Sheridan, 1994. Linked sexiness and choosiness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 242-244.
74. Ptacek, M.B., 2000. The role of mating preferences in sapping interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates. Behav. Process. 51: 111-134.
75. Rodd, F.H., K.A. Hughes, G.F. Grether & C.T. Baril, 2001. A possible non-sexual origin of a mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 269: 475-481.
76. Rowe, C., 1999. Reciever psychology and the evolution of multi-component signals. Anim. Behav. 58: 921-931.
77. Rowe, L. & D. Houle, 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263: 1415-1421.
78. Ryan, M.J. & A.S. Rand, 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47: 647-657.
79. Schluter, D., 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 325-413.
80. Shaw, P.W., G.R. Carvalho, B.H. Seghers & A.E. Magurran, 1992. Genetic consequences of an artificial introduction of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in N. Trinidad. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 248: 111-116.
81. Spiess, E.B. & L. Ehrman, 1978. Rare male mating advantage. Nature 272: 188-189.
82. Taylor, P.D. & G.C. Williams, 1982. The lek paradox is not resolved. Theor. Popul. Biol. 22: 392-409.
83. Widemo, F. & S.A. Sæther, 1999. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 26-31.
84. Winge, Ö., 1922. A peculiar mode of inheritance and its cytological explanation. J. Genet. 12: 137-144.
85. Winge, Ö., 1927. The location of eighteen genes in Lebistes reticulatus. J. Genet. 18: 1-42.
86. Winge, Ö. & E. Ditlevsen, 1947. Colour inheritance and sex determination in Lebistes. Heredity 1: 65-83.