Obstruction of pores in distal protection filters and angiographically- documented flow impairment during carotid artery stenting

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 661-670

  Sorimachi, Takatoshi ^a   Nishino, Kazuhiko ^a   Morita, Kenichi ^a   Sasaki, Osamu ^b   Koike, Tetsuo ^b   Ito, Yasushi ^a   Fujii, Yukihiko ^a  

^a NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NIIGATA CITY GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Blood flow; Carotid artery stent; Cerebral protection filter; Complication; Digital subtraction angiography; Embolic protection device

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD FILTER; BRAIN PROTECTION; CAROTID ARTERIOGRAPHY; CAROTID ARTERY FLOW; CAROTID ARTERY STENTING; DEVICE THERAPY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ANGIOPLASTY; CAROTID STENOSIS; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POROSITY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 77958549160     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: 15451550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1583/10-3142MR.1     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Casserly IP, Abou-Chebl A, Fathi RB, et al. Slow-flow phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with embolic protection devices: predictors and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1466-1472.
2. Roffi M, Greutmann M, Schwarz U, et al. Flow impairment during protected carotid artery stenting: impact of filter device design. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15:103-109.
3. Angelini A, Reimers B, Della Barbera M, et al. Cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: collection and histopathologic analysis of embolized debris. Stroke. 2002;33:456-461.
4. Castellan L, Causin F, Danieli D, et al. Carotid stenting with filter protection. Correlation of ACT values with angiographic and histopathologic findings. J Neuroradiol. 2003;30:103-108. (Pubitemid 36383487)
5. Kwon BJ, Han MH, Kang HS, et al. Protection filter-related events in extracranial carotid artery stenting: a single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13:711-722.
6. Hayashi K, Kitagawa N, Morikawa M, et al. Observation of the embolus protection filter for carotid artery stenting. Surg Neurol. 2009;72:532-537.
7. Sakamoto M, Taoka T, Nakagawa H, et al. Magnetic resonance plaque imaging to predict the occurrence of the slow-flow phenomenon in carotid artery stenting procedures. Neuroradiology. 2010;52:275-283.
8. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445-453.
9. Sorimachi T, Nishino K, Shimbo J, et al. Routine use of debris aspiration before retrieval of distal filter protection devices in carotid arterial stenting: analysis of captured debris and evaluation of clinical results. Neurosurgery. 2010:in press.
10. Siewiorek GM, Eskandari MK, Finol EA. The Angioguard embolic protection device. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5:287-296.
11. Siewiorek GM, Wholey MH, Finol EA. In vitro performance assessment of distal protection devices for carotid artery stenting: effect of physiological anatomy on vascular resistance. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14:712-724.
12. Finol EA, Siewiorek GM, Scotti CM, et al. Wall apposition assessment and performance comparison of distal protection filters. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15:177-186.
13. Siewiorek GM, Wholey MH, Finol EA. In vitro performance assessment of distal protection filters: pulsatile flow conditions. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:735-743.
14. Rapp JH, Zhu L, Hollenbeck K, et al. Distal filtration versus flow reversal: an ex vivo assessment of the choices for carotid embolic protection. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:1181-1188.