Aboriginal peoples and forest certification: A review of the Canadian situation

Ecology and Society

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Tikina, Anna V ^a   Innes, John L ^a   Trosper, Ronald L ^a   Larson, Bruce C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Aboriginal forestry; Aboriginal peoples; Canada; First nations; Forest certification

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION BEHAVIOR; CERTIFICATION; INDIGENOUS POPULATION; LEGISLATION; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS;

CANADA;

EID: 77958508481     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-03553-150333     Document Type: Article

References (109)

1. Adam, M. C., and D. Kneeshaw. 2008. Local level criteria and indicator frameworks: a tool used to assess Aboriginal forest ecosystem values. Forest Ecology and Management 255(7):2024-2037.
2. Archer, H., R. Kozak, and D. Balsillie. 2005. The impact of forest certification labelling and advertising: an exploratory assessment of consumer purchase intent in Canada. Forestry Chronicle 81(2):229-244.
3. British Columbia Courts. 2007. Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia, 2007 BCSC 1700. Supreme Court of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Jdb-txt/SC/07/17/2007BCSC1700.pdf.
4. British Columbia Treaty Commission. 2008. Aboriginal rights. British Columbia Treaty Commission, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.bctreaty.net/files/issues_rights.php.
5. British Columbia Treaty Commission. 2009a. The issues: land and resources. British Columbia Treaty Commission, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.bctreaty.net/files/issues_landres.php.
6. British Columbia Treaty Commission. 2009b. Negotiation update: First Nations and negotiations. British Columbia Treaty Commission, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.[online] URL: http://www.bctreaty.net/files/updates.php.
7. Cajete, G. 1999. Native science: natural laws of interdependence. Clear Light Books, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
8. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 1867. The Constitution Act. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/const/const1867.html.
9. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 1982. The Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c. 11. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/const/const1982.html.
10. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 1985. Indian Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. I-5. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/rsc-1985-c-i-5/latest/rsc-1985-c-i-5.html.
11. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 1973. Calder et al. v. Attorney-General of British Columbia, [1973] S.C.R. 313. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1973/1973canlii4/1973canlii4.html.
12. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 1978. Kruger and al. v. The Queen, [1978] 1 S.C.R. 104. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1977/1977canlii3/1977canlii3.html.
13. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 1981. R. v. Haines, 1981 CanLII 495 (BC C.A.). Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.[online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/1981/1981canlii495/1981canlii495.html.
14. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 1984. Guerin v. The Queen, [1984] 2 S.C.R. 335. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.[online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1984/1984canlii25/1984canlii25.html.
15. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 1985. Dick v. The Queen, [1985] 2 S.C.R. 309. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1985/1985canlii80/1985canlii80.html.
16. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 1990. R. v. Sparrow, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1075. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.[online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1990/1990canlii104/1990canlii104.html.
17. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 1996. R. v. Van der Peet, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 507. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1996/1996canlii216/1996canlii216.html.
18. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 1997. Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1010. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.[online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1997/1997canlii302/1997canlii302.html.
19. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 1999. Halfway River First Nation v. British Columbia (Ministry of Forests), 1999 BCCA 470. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: ttp://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/1999/1999bcca470/1999bcca470.html.
20. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2002. Kitkatla Band v. British Columbia (Minister of Small Business, Tourism and Culture), 2002 SCC 31, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 146. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2002/2002scc31/2002scc31.html.
21. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2003. R. v. Powley, 2003 SCC 43, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 207. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2003/2003scc43/2003scc43.html.
22. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2004a. Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), 2004 SCC 73, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 511. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2004/2004scc73/2004scc73.html.
23. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2004b. Taku River Tlingit First Nation v. British Columbia (Project Assessment Director), 2004 SCC 74, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 550. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2004/2004scc74/2004scc74.html.
24. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2004c. Gitanyow First Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), 2004 BCSC 1734. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2004/2004bcsc1734/2004bcsc1734.html.
25. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2005a. R. v. Marshall; R. v. Bernard, 2005 SCC 43, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 220. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2005/2005scc43/2005scc43.html.
26. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2005b. Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Minister of Canadian Heritage), 2005 SCC 69, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 388. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2005/2005scc69/2005scc69.html.
27. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2005c. Huu-Ay-Aht First Nation et al. v. The Minister of Forests et al., 2005 BCSC 697. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2005/2005bcsc697/2005bcsc697.html.
28. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2006a. R. v. Morris, 2006 SCC 59, [2006] 2 S.C.R. 915. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2006/2006scc59/2006scc59.html.
29. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2006b. R. v. Sappier; R. v. Gray, 2006 SCC 54, [2006] 2 S.C. R. 686. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2006/2006scc54/2006scc54.html.
30. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2006c. Dene Tha' First Nation v. Canada (Minister of Environment), 2006 FC 1354. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fct/doc/2006/2006fc1354/2006fc1354.html.
31. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2008a. Tzeachten First Nation v. Canada (Attorney General), 2008 FC 928. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fct/doc/2008/2008fc928/2008fc928.html.
32. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2008b. Klahoose First Nation v. Sunshine Coast Forest District (District Manager), 2008 BCSC 1642. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2008/2008bcsc1642/2008bcsc1642.html.
33. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2009a. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council v. British Columbia (Utilities Commission), 2009 BCCA 67. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2009/2009bcca67/2009bcca67.html.
34. Canadian Legal Information Institute. 2009b. Kwikwetlem First Nation v. British Columbia (Utilities Commission), 2009 BCCA 68. Federation of Law Societies of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2009/2009bcca68/2009bcca68.html.
35. Canadian Standards Association (CSA). 2003. Z809-02 Sustainable forest management: requirements and guidance. CSA International, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.csa-international.org/product_areas/forest_products_marking/program_documents/CAN_CSA_Z809-02O_English.pd.
36. Cheveau, M., L. Imbeau, P. Drapeau, and L. Bélanger. 2008. Current status and future directions of traditional ecological knowledge in forest management: a review. Forestry Chronicle 84(2):231-243.
37. Coady, L. 2002. Iisaak: A new economic model for conservation-based forestry in coastal old growth forests, B.C. Journal of of Business Administration and Policy Analysis 27(Annual):1701-9680.
38. Collier, R., B. Parfitt, and D. Woollard. 2002. A voice on the land: An Indigenous peoples' guide to forest certification in Canada. [online] URL: http://www.ecotrust.ca/certification/an-indigenous-peoplesguide-forest-certification-canada.
39. Cooper, H. M. 1998. Synthesizing research: a guide for literature reviews. Third edition. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills and London, USA and UK.
40. Department of Canadian Heritage. 2004. International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. Fifth report of Canada. Government of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection/CH37-4-6-2005E.pdf.
41. Elias, P.D. 2004. Standards for Aboriginal cultural research in forest management planning in Canada. Project ASI-03/04-003. Canadian Model Forest Network, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
42. First Nations Forestry Program. 2006. An exploration of on-reserve forest management capacity and forest certification interest in First Nations communities across Canada. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/304839/publication.html.
43. First Nations Forestry Program. 2009. First Nations Forestry Program: success stories. Natural Resources Canada and Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://dsp-psd.communication.gc.ca/Collection/Fo42-327-2005E.pdf.
44. Fischer, C., F. X. Aguilar, P. Jawahar, and R. A. Sedjo. 2005. Forest certification: toward common standards? Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-05-10.pdf.
45. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). 2002. The SLIMF Initiative: a progress report. Increasing access to FSC certification for small and low intensity manged forests. FSC, Bonn, Germany. [online] URL: http://www.gtz.de/de/dokumente/end61-slimfs-initiative-progress-report-access-fsc-certific.pdf.
46. Forest Stewardship Council Australia. 2008. Draft 00 ("straw dog") of the FSC Australia National Standard-copy for public information. 7 July 2008. FSC, Melbourne, Australia. http://www.fscaustralia.org/sites/default/files/pdf/publicinfo%20draft%20july%207%2008.pdf.
47. Forest Stewardship Council Canada. 2004. National Boreal standard. FSC, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.fsccanada.org/docs/39146rc.on.ca/en/issues/racism/racepolicydialogue/ah?page=SDFF.html#fn13.
48. Forest Stewardship Council Canada. 2004-2007. Forest management standards. FSC, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.fsccanada.org/forestmanagementstd.htm.
49. Hickey, C. G., and M. Nelson. 2005. Partnerships between First Nations and the forest sector: a national survey. Sustainable Forest Management Network, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.sfmnetwork.ca/docs/e/SR_200405hickeycpart_en.pdf.
50. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC). 2004. Backgrounder: projects funded in 2003-2004. INAC, Government of Canada, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ai/mr/nr/s-d2004/02534bbk-eng.asp.
51. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. 2005. Statement-legal commentary on the concept of free, prior and informed consent. Statement issued in Geneva, Switzerland, 20 July 2005. INAC, Government of Canada, Gatineau, Quebec, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ap/ia/stmt/unp/05/pop/lgl-eng.asp.
52. International Labour Organization (ILO). 1989. C169 Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention. 27 June 1989. ILO, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.ilo.org/ilolex/cgi-lex/convde.pl?C169.
53. International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO). 2005. Status of tropical forest management 2005. ITTO, Nishi-ku, Yokohama, Japan. [online] URL: http://www.itto.int/en/sfm_detail/id=1801.
54. Jensens, J.-W., E. Kretzmann, and S. Harrington. 2002. Forest certification on tribal lands: a resource manual for Native American forest management operations and forest product enterprises. Second edition. First Nations Development Institute, Fredericksburg, Virginia, USA. [online] URL: http://www.firstnations.org/Publications/ForestryManualAll.pdf.
55. Kant, S., and D. Brubacher. 2008. Aboriginal expectations and perceived effectiveness of forest management practices and forest certification in Ontario. Forestry Chronicle 84(3):378-391.
56. Karjala, M. K., E. E. Sherry, and S. M. Dewhurst. 2004. Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest planning: a framework for recording Aboriginal resource and social values. Forest Policy and Economics 6(2):95-110.
57. Krishnaswamy, A., L. Joseph, E. Simmons, G. Thomas, and J. Passmore. 2009. First Nations, forestry, and natural resources information needs in British Columbia. [online] URL: http://www.forrex.org/publications/other/FileReports/fr09-01.pdf.
58. Masters, M., A. Tikina, and B. Larson. 2010. Forest certification audit results as potential changes in forest management in Canada. The Forestry Chronicle 86(4). [online] URL: http://www.fsccanada.org/docs/julyaug2010_forestrychronicle_comparison.pdf.
59. Mater, C. M. 2005. The Montreal process criteria and indicators and tribal views on forest health and sustainability: is there a match? Evergreen Winter 2005-2006:11-16.
60. McGregor, D. 2009. Aboriginal/non-Aboriginal relations and sustainable forest management in Canada: the influence of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. Journal of Environmental Management,in press.
61. Mistik Management Ltd. 2005-2008. CSA Z809-02 Forest certification documents. Meadow Lake, Saskatchewan, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.mistik.ca/csa.htm.
62. Molnar, A. 2003. Forest certification and communities: looking forward to the next decade. Forest Trends, Washington, D.C., USA.
63. Molnar, A. 2004. Forest certification and communities. International Forestry Review 6(2):173-180.
64. Natcher, D. C., S. Davis, and C. G. Hickey. 2005. Co-management: managing relationships, not resources. Human Organization 64(3):40-251.
65. Natcher, D. C., and C. G. Hickey. 2002. Putting the community back into community-based resource management: a criteria and indicators approach to sustainability. Human Organization 61(4):350-363.
66. National Aboriginal Forestry Association (NAFA). 1996. Assessment of the need for Aboriginal compliance with sustainable forest management and forest product certification systems. Golden Lake, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.nafaforestry.org/cert/.
67. National Aboriginal Forestry Association. 1997. An Aboriginal criterion for sustainable forest management. Golden Lake, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.nafaforestry.org/criterion/.
68. National Aboriginal Forestry Association. 2000. Aboriginal-forest sector partnerships: lessons for future collaboration. Golden Lake, Ontario, Canada.[online] URL: http://www.nafaforestry.org/nafaiog/.
69. National Aboriginal Forestry Association. 2007. Second report on First Nation-held forest tenures in Canada. Golden Lake, Ontario, Canada.
70. National Congress of American Indians (NCAI). 2002. Resolution #BIS-02-020. NCAI, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.ncai.org/ncai/data/midyear2002/BIS-02-020.pdf.
71. O'Callaghan, K., K. Grist, and D. Westgeest. 2008. Tzeachten and Gitanyow: update on the duty to consult. Aboriginal Law Bulletin. Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.fasken.com/files/Publication/ad420e9a-74b8-4170-9cae-187c4189794a/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/ecfe389c-5618-4cc0-8c43-23fe726d6403/Aboriginal%20_October_%202008_en.pdf.
72. Office of the Premier and First Nations Leadership Council. 2009. Statement on Recognition and Reconciliation Act. 2009OTP00-49-000366. Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation, Government of British Columbia, Victoria, BC, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.fns.bc.ca/pdf/Statement_RecognitionReconciliationAct.pdf.
73. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). 1969. International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. OHCHR, Geneva, Switzerland. [online] URL: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cerd.htm.
74. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 1976a. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. OHCHR, Geneva, Switzerland.[online] URL: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/ccpr.htm.
75. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 1976b. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. OHCHR, Geneva, Switzerland. [online] URL: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cescr.htm.
76. Ontario Human Rights Commission. 2001. An intersectional approach to discrimination: addressing multiple grounds in human rights claims. Ontario Human Rights Commission, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.[online] URL: http://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/resources/discussion_consultation/DissIntersectionalityFtnts/pdf.
77. Ozinga, S. 2001. Behind the logo: an environmental and social assessment of forest certification schemes. FERN, Brussels, Belgium. [online] URL: http://www.fern.org/node/532.
78. Ozinga, S. 2004. Footprints in the forest: current practice and future challenges in forest certification. FERN, Brussels, Belgium. [online] URL: http://www.fern.org/pubs/reports/footprints.pdf.
79. Parfitt, B. 2007. True partners: charting a new deal for BC, First Nations and the forests we share. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/BC_Office_Pubs/bc_2007/bc_truepartners.pdf.
80. Parrotta, J. A., and M. Agnoletti. 2007. Traditional forest knowledge: challenges and opportunities. Forest Ecology and Management 249(1-2):1-4.
81. Parsons, R., and G. Prest. 2003. Aboriginal forestry in Canada. The Forestry Chronicle 79(4):779-784.
82. Resources for Aboriginal Studies. 2006. Rex v. Jim 26 C.C.C. 236 [1915]. University of Saskatchewan Libraries, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. [online] URL: http://library2.usask.ca/native/cnlc/vol04/328.html?q=native/cnlc/vol04/328.html.
83. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). 1993. Convention on Biological Diversity. CBD, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.cbd.int/convention/convention.shtml.
84. Sherry, E., R. Halseth, G. Fondahl, M. Karjala, and B. Leon. 2005. Local-level criteria and indicators: an Aboriginal perspective on sustainable forest management. Forestry 78(5):513-539.
85. SmartWood Program. 2004. Forest management public summary for Inlailawatash Holdings Ltd. Rainforest Alliance, New York, New York, USA. [online] URL: http://http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/forestry/documents/inlailawatash.pdf.
86. SmartWood Program. 2005. Forest management public summary for Iisaak Forest Resources Ltd. Rainforest Alliance, New York, New York, USA. [online] URL: http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/forestry/documents/iisaak.pdf.
87. SmartWood Program. 2006. Forest management public summary for Pictou Landing First Nation. Rainforest Alliance, New York, New York, USA. [online] URL: http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/forestry/documents/pictou.pdf.
88. SmartWood Program. 2007a. Forest management certification assessment report for: Iisaak Forest Resources Ltd. in Ucluelet, British Columbia. Rainforest Alliance, New York, New York, USA. [online] URL: http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/forestry/documents/iisaakforestfmpubsum07.pdf.
89. SmartWood Program. 2007b. Forest management precondition verification audit report for: Iisaak Forest Resources Ltd in Ucluelet, British Columbia. Rainforest Alliance, New York, New York, USA. [online] URL: http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/forestry/documents/iisaakforestfmprecondverifaudit07.pdf.
90. SmartWood Program. 2008. Forest management 2008 annual audit report for Pictou Landing First Nation in Truro, Nova Scotia. Rainforest Alliance, New York, New York, USA. [online] URL: http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/forestry/documents/pictoupubsum08.pdf.
91. Smith, P. 1998. Aboriginal and treaty rights and Aboriginal participation: essential elements of sustainable forest management. Forestry Chronicle 74(3):327-333.
92. Smith, P. 2004. Inclusion before streamlining: the status of data collection on Aboriginal issues for sustainable forest management in Canada. Pages 94-104 in J. L. Innes, G. M. Hickey, and B. Wilson, editors. International perspectives on streamlining local-level information for sustainable forest management. Canadian Forest Service Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
93. Stevenson, M. G. 2006. The possibility of difference: rethinking co-management. Human Organization 65(2):167-181.
94. Stevenson, M. G., and P. Perrault. 2008. Capacity for what? Capacity for whom? Aboriginal capacity and Canada's forest sector. Sustainable Forest Management Network, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.sfmnetwork.ca/docs/e/Stevenson_Perrault_Capacity_Synthesis.pdf.
95. Stevenson, M. G., and J. Webb. 2003. Just another stakeholder? First Nations and sustainable forest management in Canada's Boreal forest. Pages 65-112 in P. J Burton, C. Messier, D. M. Smith, W. I. Adamowicz, P. J. Burton, C. Messier, D. W. Smith, and W. L. Adamowic, editors. Towards the sustainable management of the Boreal forest. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
96. Supreme Court of British Columbia (SCBC). 2007. Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia, 2007 BCSC 1700. SCBC, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Jdb-txt/SC/07/17/2007BCSC1700.pdf.
97. Takahashi, T., C. G. van Kooten, and I. Vertinsky. 2003. Why might forest companies certify? Results from a Canadian survey. International Forestry Review 5(4):1465-5489.
98. Tikina, A. V., R. A. Kozak, J. L. Innes, J. Chen, R. L. Trosper, P. N. Duinker, and B. C. Larson. 2009. Stakeholder perspectives on forest certification in Canada. Electronic lecture, 19 August 2009, Canadian Institute of Forestry, Mattawa, Ontario, Canada.
99. Tobique First Nation. 2002. Joint project between Sustainable Communities Initiative-Natural Resources Canada and Tobique First Nation. Tobique First Nation, New Brunswick, Canada. [online] URL: http://ess.nrcan.gc.ca/2002_2006/sci/pdf/98prs.pdf.
100. Tollefson, C. 2003. Indigenous rights and forest certification in British Columbia. Pages 93-118 in J. Kirton and V. MacLaren, editors. Hard choices, soft law: voluntary standards in global trade, environment and social governance. Ashgate Press, Aldershot, New Mexico USA.
101. Tollefson, C., F. Gale, and D. Haley. 2008. Setting the standard: certification, governance and the Forest Stewardship Council. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
102. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA). 2007. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. UN DESA, Division for Social Policy and Development, New York, New York, USA. [online] URL: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/drip.html.
103. van Kooten, G. C., H. W. Nelson, and I. Vertinsky. 2005. Certification of sustainable forest management practices: a global perspective on why countries certify. Forest Policy and Economics 7(6):857-867.
104. Virtual Law Office. 1998. The Royal Proclamation of October 7, 1763. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.bloorstreet.com/200block/rp1763.htm.
105. Wilson, J., and J. Graham. 2005. Relationships between First Nations and the forest industry: the legal and policy context. Institute on Governance, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://iog.ca/en/publications/relationships-between-first-nationsand-forest-industry-legal-and-policy-context.
106. Soil Association Woodmark. 2005. Woodmark SLIMF forest certification report: Eel Ground First Nation. Woodmark, Bristol, UK.
107. Wyatt, S. 2008. First Nations, forest lands and "Aboriginal forestry" in Canada: from exclusion to comanagement and beyond. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38:171-180. [online] URL: http://article.pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/RPAS/rpv?hm=HInit&calyLang=eng&journal=cjfr&volume=38&afpf=x07-214.pdf.
108. Yukon Conservation Society. 2003. National Boreal forest certification standards endorsed. Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.yukonconservation.org/library/newsletters/spring2004.pdf.
109. Zhang, D. 2007. The softwood lumber war: politics, economics, and the long U.S.-Canadian trade dispute. Resources For the Future Press, Washington, D.C., USA.