The diurnal cycle of precipitation from continental radar mosaics and numerical weather prediction models. Part I: Methodology and seasonal comparison

Monthly Weather Review

Volumn 138, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 3084-3106

  Surcel, Madalina ^a   Berenguer, Marc ^a   Zawadzki, Isztar ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVECTIVE EVENTS; DIURNAL CYCLE; GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL MULTISCALE MODELS; IN-PHASE; INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY; MEASURE OF PERFORMANCE; MODEL SKILL; NUMERICAL WEATHER PREDICTION MODELS; OUT OF PHASE; PROPAGATION CHARACTERISTICS; PROPAGATION MECHANISM; PROPAGATION PATHS; RADAR MOSAIC; RADAR RAINFALL; SIMULATED SYSTEM; SOLAR CYCLE; SYNOPTIC FORCING; TRANSPORT MECHANISM;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RADAR; SOLAR ENERGY; SUPERALLOYS; TIME MEASUREMENT;

GEMS;

ANNUAL VARIATION; ATMOSPHERIC TRANSPORT; CLIMATE CYCLE; CLIMATE FORCING; DIURNAL VARIATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PRECIPITATION (CLIMATOLOGY); SEASONAL VARIATION; SPRING (SEASON); SUMMER; WEATHER FORECASTING;

ROCKY MOUNTAINS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77958496615     PISSN: 00270644     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1175/2010MWR3125.1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahijevych, D. A., R. E. Carbone, J. D. Tuttle, and S. B. Trier, 2001: Radar data and climatological statistics associated with warm season precipitation episodes over the continental U.S. NCAR Tech. Note TN-4481STR, 81 pp. [Available from NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.]
2. Belair, S., and J. Mailhot, 2001: Impact of horizontal resolution on the numerical simulation of a midlatitude squall line: Implicit versus explicit condensation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2362-2376.
3. Bluestein, H., 1993: Synoptic-Dynamic Meteorology in Mid-latitudes: Observations and Theory of Weather Systems. Vol. 2. Oxford University Press, 431 pp.
4. Bryan, G. H., J. C. Wyngaard, and J. M. Fritsch, 2003: Resolution requirements for the simulation of deep moist convection. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 2394-2416.
5. Carbone, R. E., and J. D. Tuttle, 2008: Rainfall occurrence in the U.S. warm season: The diurnal cycle. J. Climate, 21, 4132-4146.
6. Carbone, R. E., J. D. Tuttle, D. A. Ahijevych, and S. B. Trier, 2002: Inferences of predictability associated with warm season precipitation episodes. J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 2033-2056.
7. Casati, B., and Coauthors, 2008: Forecast verification: Current status and future directions. Meteor. Appl., 15, 3-18.
8. Clark, A. J., W. A. Gallus, and T. C. Chen, 2007: Comparison of the diurnal precipitation cycle in convection-resolving and non-convection-resolving mesoscale models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 3456-3473.
9. Dai, A. G., F. Giorgi, and K. E. Trenberth, 1999: Observed and model-simulated diurnal cycles of precipitation over the contiguous United States. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 6377-6402.
10. Davis, C. A., K. W. Manning, R. E. Carbone, S. B. Trier, and J. D. Tuttle, 2003: Coherence of warm-season continental rainfall in numerical weather prediction models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 2667-2679.
11. Fritsch, J. M., and G. S. Forbes, 2001: Mesoscale convective systems. Severe Convective Storms, Meteor. Monogr., No. 50, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 323-357.
12. Gallus, W. A., Jr., 2002: Impact of the verification grid-box size on warm-season QPF skill measures. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 1296-1302.
13. Germann, U., and I. Zawadzki, 2002: Scale dependence of the predictability of precipitation from continental radar images. Part I: Description of the methodology. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2859-2873.
14. Janowiak, J. E., V. E. Kousky, and R. J. Joyce, 2005: Diurnal cycle of precipitation determined from the CMORPH high spatial and temporal resolution global precipitation analyses. J. Geophys. Res., 110, D23105, doi:10.1029/2005JD006156.
15. Janowiak, J. E., V. J. Dagostaro, V. E. Kousky, and R. J. Joyce, 2007: An examination of precipitation in observations and model forecasts during NAME with emphasis on the diurnal cycle. J. Climate, 20, 1680-1692.
16. Kain, J. S., and Coauthors, 2008: Some practical considerations regarding horizontal resolution in the first generation of operational convection-allowing NWP. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 931-952.
17. Knievel, J. C., D. A. Ahijevych, and K. W. Manning, 2004: Using temporal modes of rainfall to evaluate the performance of a numerical weather prediction model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2995-3009.
18. Laroche, S., P. Gauthier, J. St.-James, and J. Morneau, 1999: Implementation of a 3D variational data assimilation system at the Canadian Meteorological Center. Part II: The regional analysis. Atmos.-Ocean, 37, 281-307.
19. Mailhot, J., and Coauthors, 2006: The 15-km version of the Canadian regional forecast system. Atmos.-Ocean, 44, 133-149.
20. Mass, C. F., D. Ovens, K. Westrick, and B. A. Colle, 2002: Does increasing horizontal resolution produce more skillful forecasts? The results of two years of real-time numerical weather prediction over the Pacific Northwest. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 407-430.
21. Parker, M. D., and D. A. Ahijevych, 2007: Convective episodes in the east-central United States. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 3707-3727.
22. Trier, S. B., C. A. Davis, D. A. Ahijevych, M. L. Weisman, and G. H. Bryan, 2006: Mechanisms supporting long-lived episodes of propagating nocturnal convection within a 7-day WRF model simulation. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 2437-2461.
23. Tuttle, J. D., and C. A. Davis, 2006: Corridors of warm season precipitation in the central United States. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2297-2317.
24. Wallace, J. M., 1975: Diurnal variations in precipitation and thunderstorm frequency over the conterminous United States. Mon. Wea. Rev., 103, 406-419.
25. Weisman, M. L., W. C. Skamarock, and J. B. Klemp, 1997: The resolution dependence of explicitly modeled convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 527-548.
26. Wilks, D. S., 1995: Statistical Methods in Atmospheric Sciences. Academic Press, 467 pp.
27. Zhang, J., K. Howard, and J. J. Gourley, 2005: Constructing three-dimensional multiple-radar reflectivity mosaics: Examples of convective storms and stratiform rain echoes. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 22, 30-42.