Plant-pollinator population dynamics

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 270-277

  Fishman, Michael A ^a   Hadany, Lilach ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Bees; Bi stability; Dynamics; Ecology; Individual level; Mathematical; Model; ODE; Pollination; Population level

Indexed keywords

BEE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MUTUALISM; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION STRUCTURE; TROPHIC INTERACTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEE; FLOWER; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ANIMALS; BEES; FLOWERS; POLLINATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

APOIDEA;

EID: 77958491983     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: 10960325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2010.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Allen-Wardell G., Bernhardt P., Bitner R., Burquez A., Buchmann S., Cane J., Cox P.A., Dalton V., Feinsinger P., Ingram M., Inouye D., Jones C.E., Kennedy K., Kevan P., Koopowitz H., Medellin R., Medellin-Morales S., Nabhan G.P., Pavlik B., Tepedino V., Torchio P., Walker S. The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields. Conserv. Biol. 1998, 12:8-17. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.97154.x.
2. Beddington J.R. Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. J. Anim. Ecol. 1975, 44:331-340.
3. Beekman M., Ratnieks F.L.W. Long-range foraging by the honey-bee. Apis mellifera L. Funct. Ecol. 2000, 14:490-496. 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00443.x.
4. Begon M., Harper J.L., Townsend C.R. Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities 1995, Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass, (a) ch-6, (b) ch-9.
5. Biesmeijer J.C. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 2006, 313:351-354. 10.1126/science.1127863.
6. Borghans J.A.M., DeBoer R.J., Segel L.A. Extending the quasi-steady state approximation by changing variables. Bull. Math. Biol. 1996, 58:43-63. 10.1007/BF02458281.
7. Buchmann S., Ascher J.S. The plight of pollinating bees. Bee World 2005, 86:71-74.
8. Castellanos M.C., Wilson P., Thomson J.D. Dynamic nectar replenishment in flowers of Penstemon (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2002, 89:111-118.
9. Charnov E.L. Optimal foraging, marginal value theorem. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1976, 9:129-136.
10. Crane P.R., Friis E.M., Pedersen K.R. Lower cretaceous angiosperm flowers-fossil evidence on early radiation of dicotyledons. Science 1986, 232:852-854.
11. Crane P.R., Friis E.M., Pedersen K.R. The origin and early diversification of angiosperms. Nature 1995, 374:27-33.
12. DeAngelis D.L., Goldstein R.A., O'Neill R.V. Model for trophic interactions. Ecology 1975, 56:881-892.
13. Davies T.J., Barraclough T.G., Chase M.W., Soltis P.S., Soltis D.E., Savolainen V. Darwin's abominable mystery: insights from a super tree of the angiosperms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:1904-1909. 10.1073/pnas.0308127100.
14. Dixon K.W. Pollination and restoration. Science 2009, 325:571-573. 10.1126/science.1176295.
15. Getz W.M. Disease and the dynamics of food webs. PLoS. Biol. 2009, 7. Art. no. e1000209. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000209.
16. Gilbert F., Azmeh S., Barnard C., Behnke J., Collins S.A., Hurst J., Shuker D. Individually recognizable scent marks on flowers made by a solitary bee. Anim. Behav. 2001, 61:217-229. 10.1006/anbe.2000.1542.
17. Ginzburg L.R., Jensen C.X.J., Yule J.V. Aiming the "unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics" at ecological theory. Ecol. Model. 2007, 207:356-362. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.05.015.
18. Goulson D., Cruise J.L., Sparrow K.R., Harris A.J., Park K.J., Tinsley M.C., Gilburn A.S. Choosing rewarding flowers; perceptual limitations and innate preferences influence decision making in bumblebees and honeybees. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2007, 61:1523-1529. 10.1007/s00265-007-0384-4.
19. Greenleaf S.S., Williams N.M., Winfree R., Kremen C. Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 2007, 153:589-596. 10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9.
20. Grossberg S. Competition, decision, and consensus. J. math. Anal. Appl. 1978, 66:470-493.
21. Gross T., Edwards A.M., Feudel U. The invisible niche: weakly density-dependent mortality and the coexistence of species. J. Theort. Biol 2009, 258:148-155. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.01.018.
22. Hernandez-Conrique D., Ornelas J.F., Garcia-Franco J.G., Vargas C.F. Nectar production of Calliandra longipedicellata (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae), an endemic Mexican shrub with multiple potential pollinators. Biotropica 2007, 39:459-467. 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00277.x.
23. Holland J.N., DeAngelis D.L. Interspecific population regulation and the stability of mutualism: fruit abortion and density-dependent mortality of pollinating seed-eating insects. Oikos 2006, 113:563-571. 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14430.x.
24. Holling C.S. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entom. 1959, 91:385-398.
25. Hu S.S., Dilcher D.L., Jarzen D.M., Taylor D.W. Early steps of angiosperm-pollinator coevolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:240-245. 10.1073/pnas.0707989105.
26. Hutchings M.J., Budd C.S.J. Plant competition and its course through time. Bioscience 1981, 31:640-645.
27. Jones K.N., Reithel J.S. Pollinator-mediated selection on a flower color polymorphism in experimental populations of Antirrhinum (Scrophulariaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2001, 88:447-454.
28. Kacelnik A., Houston A.I., Schmid-Hempel P. Central-place foraging in honeybees-the effects of travel time and nectar flow on crop filling. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1986, 19:19-24.
29. Kearns C.A., Inouye D.W., Waser N.M. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1998, 29:83-112.
30. Keasar T., Sadeh A., Shmida A. Variability in nectar production and standing crop, and their relation to pollinator visits in a Mediterranean shrub. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2008, 2:117-123. 10.1007/s11829-008-9040-9.
31. Lonsdorf E., Kremen C., Ricketts T., Winfree R., Williams N., Greenleaf S. Modelling pollination services across agricultural landscapes. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103:1589-1600. 10.1093/aob/mcp069.
32. Mitchell R.J., Irwin R.E., Flanagan R.J., Karron J.D. Ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103:1355-1363. 10.1093/aob/mcp122.
33. Ohashi K., Thomson J.D. Trapline foraging by pollinators: its ontogeny, economics and possible consequences for plants. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103:1365-1378. 10.1093/aob/mcp088.
34. Olsson O., Brown J.S., Helf K.L. A guide to central place effects in foraging. Theor. Popul. Biol. 2008, 74:22-33. 10.1016/j.tpb.2008.04.005.
35. Pasquet R.S., Peltier A., Hufford M.B., Oudin E., Saulnier J., Paul L., Knudsen J.T., Herren H.R., Gepts P. Long-distance pollen flow assessment through evaluation of pollinator foraging range suggests transgene escape distances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:13456-13461. 10.1073/pnas.0806040105.
36. Perko L. Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems 1996, Springer-Verlag, NewYork, (Chapter 2). 2nd ed.
37. Pianka E.R. Evolutionary Ecology 1974, Harper and Row, New York, 133-146.
38. Romanuk T.N., Zhou Y., Brose U., Berlow E.L., Williams R.J., Martinez N.D. Predicting invasion success in complex ecological networks. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2009, 364:1743-1754. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0286.
39. Sakai S., Suzuki Y., Itagaki T., Tsujisawa H., Makino T.T. On the function of hermaphrodite florets in female inflorescences of Petasites japonicus (Asteraceae). Botany 2008, 86:179-184. 10.1139/B07-121.
40. Schmid-Hempel P., Schmid-Hempel R. Efficient nectar-collecting by honeybees II. Response to factors determining nectar availability. J. Anim. Ecol. 1987, 56:219-227.
41. Saleh N., Chittka L. The importance of experience in the interpretation of conspecific chemical signals. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2006, 61:215-220. 10.1007/s00265-006-0252-7.
42. Saleh N., Ohashi K., Thomson J.D., Chittka L. Facultative use of the repellent scent mark in foraging bumblebees: complex versus simple flowers. Anim. Behav. 2006, 71:847-854. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.06.014.
43. Segel L.A., Slemrod M. The quasi-steady state assumption: a case study in perturbation. SIAM Rev. 1989, 31:446-477.
44. Stephanou M., Petropoulou Y., Georgiou O., Manetas Y. Enhanced UV-B radiation, flower attributes and pollinator behaviour in Cistus creticus: a Mediterranean field study. Plant Ecol. 2000, 147:165-171. 10.1023/A:1009802401955.
45. Stout J.C., Goulson D. The use of conspecific and interspecific scent marks by foraging bumblebees and honeybees. Anim. Behav. 2001, 62:183-189. 10.1006/anbe.2001.1729.
46. Stout J.C., Goulson D. The influence of nectar secretion rates on the responses of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) to previously visited flowers. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2002, 52:239-246. 10.1007/s00265-002-0510-2.
47. Warren J., James P. Do flowers wave to attract pollinators? A case study with silene maritime. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:1024-1029. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01543.x.
48. Westphal C., Steffan-Dewenter I., Tscharntke T. Foraging trip duration of bumblebees in relation to landscape-wide resource availability. Ecol. Entomol. 2006, 31:389-394. 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00801.x.
49. Williams C.S. The identity of the previous visitor influences flower rejection by nectar-collecting bees. Anim. Behav. 1998, 56:673-681. 10.1006/anbe.1998.0794.
50. Williams N.M., Thomson J.D. Trapline foraging by bumble bees: III. Temporal patterns of visitation and foraging success at single plants. Behav. Ecol. 1998, 9:612-621. 10.1093/aob/mcp088.
51. Williams R.J. Effects of network and dynamical model structure on species persistence in large model food webs. Theor. Ecol. 2008, 1:141-151. 10.1007/s12080-008-0013-5.
52. Yokoi T., Goulson D., Fujisaki K. The use of heterospecific scent marks by the sweat bee Halictus aerarius. Naturwissenschaften 2007, 94:1021-1024. 10.1007/s00114-007-0285-4.
53. Yokoi T., Fujisaki K. Recognition of scent marks in solitary bees to avoid previously visited flowers. Ecol. Res. 2009, 24:803-809. 10.1007/s11284-008-0551-8.
54. Zimmerman M. Pollination biology of montane plants-relationship between rate of nectar production and standing crop. Am. Midl. Nat. 1988, 120:50-57.