Stabilizing the empirical Green function analysis: Development of the projected Landweber method

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 394-409

  Vallée, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; GREEN'S FUNCTION; WAVE PROPAGATION;

DECONVOLUATIONS; HYPOCENTERS;

SEISMOLOGY;

DECONVOLUTION; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; GREEN FUNCTION; SEISMIC SOURCE; WAVE PROPAGATION;

EID: 1642525220     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1785/0120030017     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aki, K., and P. Richards (1980). Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods, W. H. Freeman, New York.
2. s = 7.2), California earthquakes, Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 97-100.
3. Bertero, M. (1989). Linear inverse and ill-posed problems, in Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Vol. 75, P. W. Hawkes (Editor), Academic, New York, 1-120.
4. Bertero, M., P. Boccacci, and F. Maggio (1995). Regularization methods in image restoration: an application to HST images, Int. J. Imaging Systems Tech. 6, 376-386.
5. Bertero, M., D. Bindi, P. Boccacci, M. Cattaneo, C. Eva, and V. Lanza (1997). Application of the projected Landweber method to the estimation of the source time function in seismology. Inverse Problems 13, 465-486.
6. Centroid Moment Tensor (CMT) Catalog, www.seismology.harvard.edu/ CMTsearch.html (last accessed February 2004).
7. Courboulex, F., M. A. Santoyo, J. F. Pacheco, and S. K. Singh (1997a). The 14 September 1995 (M 7.3) Copan, Mexico, earthquake: a source study using teleseismic, regional, and local data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 87, 999-1010.
8. w 8): a study of the rupture process, Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 1019-1022.
9. Ekström, G. (1989). A very broad band inversion method for the recovery of earthquake source parameters, Tectonophysics 166, 73-100
10. Earthquake Research Institute (ERI) (2001). EIC seismological note: Peru Earthquake on June 23, 2001, University of Tokyo.
11. Fukuyama, E., and K. Irikura (1986). Rupture process of the 1983 Japan Sea (Akita-Oki) earthquake using a waveform inversion method, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 76, 1623-1640.
12. Hartzell, S. H. (1978). Earthquake aftershocks as Green's functions, Geophys. Res. Lett. 5, 1-4.
13. Hartzell, S. H., and T. H. Heaton (1993). Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 73, 1553-1583.
14. Ihmlé, P. F. (1996). Frequency-dependent relocation of the 1992 Nicaragua slow earthquake: an empirical Green's function approach. Geophys. J. Int. 127, 75-85.
15. Ihmlé, P. F. (1998). On the interpretation of subevents in teleseismic waveforms: the 1994 Bolivia deep earthquake revisited, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 17,919-17,932.
16. w = 8.1 Chile 1995 event. Geophys. J. Int. 131, 146-158.
17. Kikuchi, M., and H. Kanamori (1982). Inversion of complex body waves, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72, 491-506.
18. Lawson, C., and R. Hanson (1974). Solving Least Square Problems, Prentice Hall, New York.
19. Marson-Pidgeon, K., B. L. N. Kennett, and M. Sambridge (2000). Source depth and mechanism inversion at teleseismic distances using a neighborhood algorithm, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90, 1369-1383.
20. Mori, J., and A. Frankel (1990). Source parameters for small events associated with the 1996 North Palm Springs, California, earthquake determined using empirical Green functions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 80, 278-295.
21. Mueller, C. S. (1985). Source pulse enhancement by deconvolution of an empirical Green's function. Geophys. Res. Lett. 12, 33-36.
22. Olson, A. H., and R. J. Apsel (1982). Finite fault and inverse theory with applications to the 1979 Imperial Valley earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72, 1969-2001.
23. Piana, M., and M. Bertero (1997). Projected Landweber method and preconditioning, Inverse Problems 13, 441-463.
24. Sambridge, M. (1999). Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm, I. Searching a parameter space, Geophys. J. Int. 138, 479-494.
25. Schwartz, S. Y. (1999). Noncharacteristic behavior and complex recurrence of large subduction zone earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 23,111-23,125.
26. Sladen, A., and R. Madariaga (2002). Nonlinear inversion of body wave-forms of the June 2001 earthquakes in southern Peru, EOS 83 (Fall Meet. Suppl.), Abstract S71C-1105.
27. Tavera, H., E. Buforn, I. Bernal, Y. Antayhua, and L. Vilacapoma (2002). The Arequipa (Peru) earthquake of June 23, 2001, J. Seismology 6, 279-283.
28. Seismological Observatory, University of Michigan (SOUM)(2001). www.geo.lsa.umich.edu/SeismoObs/STF/010626_Peru (last accessed February 2004).
29. Vallée, M., M. Bouchon, and S. Y. Schwartz (2003). The January 13, 2001 El Salvador earthquake: a multi-data analysis, J. Geophys. Res. 108, no. B4, 2203. doi 10.1029/2002JB001922.
30. w = 7.3), Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 735-750.
31. w = 7.5) earthquake and its tectonic implications, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 28,065-28,080.
32. Youla, D. C., and H. Webb (1982). Image restoration by the method of convex projections. I. Theory. IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging MI-1, 81-94.