Distribution, behavior, and transport of inorganic and methylmercury in a high gradient stream

Applied Geochemistry

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1756-1769

  Flanders, J R ^a   Turner, R R ^b   Morrison, T ^a   Jensen, R ^c   Pizzuto, J ^d   Skalak, K ^e   Stahl, R ^f  

^a URS CORPORATION   (United States)

^b RTGeosciences Inc   (Canada)

^c Unique Environmental Services   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^e U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^f DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL IMPACTS; AQUEOUS EXTRACTION; BIOLOGICAL MEDIA; FE REDUCTIONS; FINE-GRAINED SEDIMENT; FLOODPLAIN SOILS; HIGH-GRADIENT STREAMS; INDUSTRIAL USE; METHYLMERCURY; MODERATE TEMPERATURE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF; NON-POINT SOURCE; ORGANIC CONTENT; PAST AND PRESENT; PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS; POINT SOURCES; PORE WATERS; POTENTIAL CONTROL; SEASONAL CHANGES; STRONG SEASONAL PATTERN; STUDY AREAS; SULFATE CONCENTRATIONS; TRANSPORT MECHANISM; VIRGINIA;

ALKYLATION; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; MERCURY (METAL); MERCURY COMPOUNDS; METHYLATION; POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE; SEDIMENTOLOGY; SEDIMENTS; SOILS; SOLVENT EXTRACTION; ULTRAFILTRATION;

RIVERS;

ACCUMULATION; AGRICULTURAL RUNOFF; BANK EROSION; BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FINE GRAINED SEDIMENT; FLOODPLAIN; GEOMORPHOLOGY; INDUSTRIAL LOCATION; LAND USE; MERCURY (ELEMENT); METHYLATION; METHYLMERCURY; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; POREWATER; SEDIMENT POLLUTION; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SURFACE WATER; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATERSHED;

SOUTH RIVER [VIRGINIA]; UNITED STATES; VIRGINIA;

EID: 77958458325     PISSN: 08832927     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Amyot M., Morel F.M.M., Ariya P.A. Dark oxidation of dissolved and liquid elemental mercury in aquatic environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39:110-114.
2. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. 20th ed.
3. Babiarz C.L., Benoit J.M., Shafer M.M., Andren A.W., Hurley J.P., Webb D.A. Seasonal influences on partitioning and transport of total and methylmercury in rivers from contrasting watersheds. Biogeochemistry 1998, 41:237-257.
4. Balcom P.H., Fitzgerald W.F., Vandal G.M., Lamborg C.H., Rolfhus K.R., Langer C.S., Hammerschmidt C.R. Mercury sources and cycling in the Connecticut River and Long Island Sound. Mar. Chem. 2004, 90:53-74.
5. Balogh S.J., Meyer M.L., Johnson D.K. Transport of mercury in three contrasting river basins. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32:456-462.
6. Barbour M.T., Gerritsen J., Snyder B.D., Stribling J.B. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers, Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish 1999, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, EPA 841-B-99-002.
7. Barnett M.O., Harris L.A., Turner R.R., Stevenson R.J., Henson T.J., Melton R.C., Hoffman D.P. Formation of mercuric sulfide in soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 31:3037-3043.
8. Benoit G. Evidence of the particle concentration effect for lead and other metals in fresh waters based on ultraclean technique analyses. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59:2677-2687.
9. Bergeron C.M., Husak J.F., Unrine J.M., Romanek C.S., Hopkins W.A. Influence of feeding ecology on blood mercury concentrations in four species of turtles. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2007, 26:1733-1741.
10. Bidwell J.R., Heath A.G. An in situ study of rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris) physiology, effect of season and mercury contamination. Hydrobiologia 1993, 264:137-152.
11. Bloom N.S. Determination of picogram levels of methylmercury by aqueous phase ethylation, followed by cryogenic gas chromatography with cold vapor atomic fluorescence detection. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 1989, 46:1131-1140.
12. Bloom N.S. Influence of analytical conditions on the observed reactive mercury concentrations in natural freshwaters. Mercury Pollution, Integration and Synthesis 1994, 541-552. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL. C.J. Watras, J.W. Huckabee (Eds.).
13. Bloom N.S., Crecelius A. Determination of mercury in seawater at sub-nanogram per liter levels. Mar. Chem. 1983, 14:49-59.
14. Bloom N.S., Fitzgerald W.F. Determination of volatile mercury species at the picogram level by low temperature gas chromatography with cold vapor atomic fluorescence detection. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1988, 208:151-161.
15. Bloom N.S., Coleman J.A., Barber L. Artifact formation of methyl mercury during extraction of environmental samples by distillation. Fresen. J. Anal. Chem. 1997, 358:371-377.
16. Bloom N.S., Preus E.M., Katon J., Hiltner M. Selective extractions to assess the biogeochemically relevant fractionation of inorganic mercury in sediments and soils. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 479:233-248.
17. Bodaly R.A., Rudd J.W.M., Fudge R.J.P., Kelly C.A. Mercury concentrations in fish related to size of remote Canadian Shield lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1993, 50:980-987.
18. Bolgiano, R.W., 1980. Mercury Contamination of the South, South Fork Shenandoah and Shenandoah Rivers, Commonwealth of Virginia Water Control Board, Richmond, VA, Basic Data Bulletin No. 47.
19. Bolgiano, R.W., 1981. Mercury Contamination of the Floodplains of the South and South Fork Shenandoah Rivers, Commonwealth of Virginia Water Control Board, Richmond, VA, Basic Data Bulletin No. 48.
20. Brasso R.L., Cristol D.A. Effects of mercury exposure on the reproductive success of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Ecotoxicology 2008, 17:133-141.
21. Carr, D., Lewin-Koh, N., Maechler, M., 2009. Hexbin: Hexagonal Binning Routines. R Package Version 1.18.0.http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=hexbin.
22. Carter L.J. Chemical plants leave unexpected legacy for two Virginia rivers. Science 1977, 198:1015-1020.
23. Castelle S., Schafer J., Blanc G., Audry S., Etcheber H., Lissalde J.P. 50-year record and solid state speciation of mercury in natural and contaminated reservoir sediment. Appl. Geochem. 2007, 22:1359-1370.
24. Clever H.L., Johnson S.A., Derrick M.E. The solubility of mercury and some sparingly soluble mercury salts in water and aqueous electrolyte solutions. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1985, 14:631.
25. Cocking D., Hayes R., King M.L., Rohrer M.J., Thomas R.W.D. Compartmentalization of mercury in biotic components of terrestrial floodplain ecosystems adjacent to the South River at Waynesboro, VA. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1991, 57(58):159-170.
26. Compeau G.C., Bartha R. Sulfate-reducing bacteria, principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985, 50:498-502.
27. Cook S.R., Parker A. Sequential extraction and single-step cold-acid extraction: a feasibility study for use with freshwater-canal sediments. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2006, 170:95-105.
28. Craig, D., 1992. Physiological, Population, and Genetic Responses of an Aquatic Insect (Isonychia bicolor) to Chronic Mercury Pollution. Dissertation Abstracts 53, 6100-B-6101-B.
29. Cristol D.A., Brasso R.L., Condon A.M., Fovargue R.E., Friedman S.L., Hallinger K.K., Monroe A.P., White A.E. The movement of aquatic mercury through terrestrial food webs. Science 2008, 320:335.
30. Drott A., Lambertsson L., Björn E., Skyllberg U. Do potential methylation rates reflect accumulated methyl mercury in contaminated sediments?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:153-158.
31. Eggleston, J., 2009. Mercury Loads in the South River and Simulation of Mercury Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for the South River, South Fork Shenandoah River, and Shenandoah River-Shenandoah Valley, Virginia, US Geol. Surv. Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5076.
32. Fang S.C. Studies on the sorption of elemental mercury vapor on soils. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1981, 10:193-201.
33. Fry, J.A., Coan, M.J., Homer, C.G., Meyer, D.K., Wickham, J.D., 2009. Completion of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 1992-2001 Land Cover Change Retrofit product, US Geol. Surv. Open-File Rep. 2008-1379.
34. Gee G.W., Bauder J.W. Particle size analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods 1986, 383-411. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, (Chapter 15). second ed. A. Klute (Ed.).
35. Gilmour C.C., Henry E.A., Mitchell R. Sulfate stimulation of mercury methylation in freshwater sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992, 26:2281-2287.
36. Hallock D. A Comparison of Water Quality Data Collected from Two Washington Rivers by the Department of Ecology and the US Geological Survey 2005, Washington State Department of Ecology.
37. Hammerschmidt C.R., Fitzgerald W.F., Lamborg C.H., Balcom P.H., Visscher P.T. Biogeochemistry of methylmercury in sediments of Long Island Sound. Mar. Chem. 2004, 90:31-52.
38. Heaven S., Ilyushchenko M.A., Kamberov I.M., Politikov M.I., Tanton T.W., Ullrich S.M., YanIn E.P. Mercury in the River Nura and its floodplain: Central Kazakhstan, II. Floodplain soils and riverbank silt deposits. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 260:45-55.
39. Hendricks A.C., Snyder C., Willis L. The production of a hydropsychid caddisfly in a fourth order mountain stream contaminated with mercury. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 1991, 24:1694-1697.
40. Hissler C., Probst J.L. Chlor-alkali industrial contamination and riverine transport of mercury: distribution and partitioning of mercury between water, suspended matter, and bottom sediment of the Thur River, France. Appl. Geochem. 2006, 21:1837-1854.
41. Horvat M., Bloom N.S., Liang L. A comparison of distillation with other current isolation methods for the determination of methyl mercury compounds in low level environmental samples. Part 2. Water. Anal. Chim. Acta 1993, 282:153-168.
42. Issaro N., Abi-Ghanem C., Bermond A. Fractionation studies of mercury in soils and sediments: a review of the chemical reagents used for mercury extraction. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 631:1-12.
43. Kim C.S., Bloom N.S., Rytuba J.J., Brown G.E. Mercury speciation by X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy and sequential chemical extractions: a comparison of speciation methods. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:5102-5108.
44. Klitzke S., Lang F. Hydrophobicity of soil colloids and heavy metal mobilization, effects of drying. J Environ. Qual. 2007, 36:1187-1193.
45. Korthals E.T., Winfrey M.R. Seasonal and spatial variations in mercury methylation and demethylation in an oligotrophic lake. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1987, 53:2397-2404.
46. Landa E.R. The retention of metallic mercury vapor by soils. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1978, 42:1407-1411.
47. Lawson N.M., Mason R.P. Concentration of mercury, methylmercury, cadmium, lead, arsenic, and selenium in the rain and stream water of two contrasting watersheds in western Maryland. Water Res. 2001, 35:4039-4052.
48. Lawson N.M., Mason R.P., Laporte J.M. The fate and transport of mercury, methylmercury, and other trace metals in Chesapeake Bay tributaries. Water Res. 2001, 35:501-515.
49. MapTech, I., 2004. Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds.
50. Marvin-Dipasquale M., Agee J., McGowan C., Oremland R.S., Thomas M., Krabbenhoft D., Gilmour C.C. Methyl-mercury degradation pathways: a comparison among three mercury-impacted ecosystems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34:4908-4916.
51. Marvin-DiPasquale M., Lutz M.A., Brigham M.E., Krabbenhoft D.P., Aiken G.R., Orem W.H., Hall B.D. Mercury cycling in stream ecosystems. 2. Benthic methylmercury production and bed sediment-pore water partitioning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:2726-2732.
52. Mason R.P., Lawrence A.L. Concentration, distribution, and bioavailability of mercury and methylmercury in sediments of Baltimore Harbor and Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, USA. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1999, 18:2438-2447.
53. Meili M. Mercury in lakes and rivers. Mercury and Its Effects on Environment and Biology 1997, vol. 34:21-51. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, (Chapter 2). A. Sigel, H. Sigel (Eds.).
54. Miller C.L., Mason R.P., Gilmore C.G., Heyes A. Influence of dissolved organic matter on complexation of Hg under sulfidic conditions. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2007, 26:624-633.
55. Murphy, G.W., 2004. Uptake of Mercury and Relationship to Food Habits of Selected Fish Species in the Shenandoah River Basin: Virginia MS Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
56. Perry, C.A., Wolock, D.M., Artman, J.C., 2004. Estimation of Median Flows for Streams on the 1999 Kansas Surface Water Register. US Geol. Surv. Scient. Invest. Rep. 2004-5032.
57. Pizzuto J.P., O'Neal M. Increased mid-twentieth century riverbank erosion rates related to the demise of mill dams, South River, Virginia. Geology 2009, 37:19-22.
58. Poppenga, S.K., Worstell, B.B., 2008. Elevation-Derived Watershed Basins and Characteristics for Major Rivers of the Conterminous United States, US Geol. Surv. Scient. Invest. Rep. 2008-5153.
59. R Development Core Team, 2009. R, A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.http://www.R-project.org.
60. Ramlal P.S., Kelly C.A., Rudd J.W.M., Furutani A. Sites of methyl mercury production in remote Canadian Shield. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1993, 50:972-979.
61. Rhoades E.L., O'Neal M.A., Pizzuto J.E. Quantifying bank erosion on the South River from 1937 to 2005, and its importance in assessing Hg contamination. Appl. Geogr. 2009, 29:125-134.
62. Rickard D., Morse J.W. Acid volatile sulfide (AVS). Mar. Chem. 2005, 97:141-197.
63. Roden E.E., Wetzel R.G. Organic carbon oxidation and suppression of methane production by microbial Fe(III) oxide reduction in vegetated and unvegetated freshwater wetland sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1996, 41:1733-1748.
64. Rouse-Campbell K., Ford C.J., Levine D.A. Mercury distribution in poplar creek, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1998, 17:1191-1198.
65. Sarkar, D., 2008. Lattice: Multivariate Data Visualization with R. Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-75968-5.http://lmdvr.r-forge.r-project.org/.
66. Skalak K.J., Pizzuto J.P. The distribution and residence time of suspended sediment stored within the channel margins of a gravel-bed bedrock river. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 2010, 35:435-446.
67. Southworth G.R., Turner R.R., Peterson M.J., Bogle M.A., Ryon M.G. Response of mercury contamination in fish to decreased aqueous concentrations and loading of mercury in a small stream. Environ. Monitor. Assess. 2000, 63:481-494.
68. Southworth, G.R., Turner, R.R, Bogle, M.A., 2003. Mercury and methylmercury relationships in contaminated streams in the southeastern USA. In: Nriagu, J.O. (Ed.), 11th Ann, Internat. Conf. Heavy Metals in the Environment, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, Contribution #1409.
69. Southworth G.R., Peterson M.J., Bogle M.A. Bioaccumulation factors for mercury in stream fish. Environ. Pract. 2004, 6:135-143.
70. SRST, 2009. South River Mercury Study, South River Science Team Update, First Half 2009.
71. Terzano R., Santoro A., Spagnuolo M., Vekemans B., Medici L., Janssens K., Göttlicher J., Denecke M.A., Mangold S., Ruggiero P. Solving mercury (Hg) speciation in soil samples by synchrotron X-ray microspectroscopic techniques. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:2702-2709.
72. Todorova S.G., Driscoll C.T., Matthews D.A., Effler S.W., Hines M.E., Henry E.A. Evidence for regulation of monomethyl mercury by nitrate in a seasonally stratified eutrophic lake. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:6572-6578.
73. Turner R.R., Southworth G.R. Mercury-contaminated industrial and mining sites in North America: an overview with selected case studies. Mercury Contaminated Sites - Characterization, Risk Assessment and Remediation 1999, 89-112. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. R. Ebinghaus, R.R. Turner, L.D. de Lacerda, O. Vasiliev, W. Salomons (Eds.).
74. USEPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods (SW-846) 1996, USEPA, Washington, DC. third ed. and updates.
75. USGS, 2009. National Water Information System, Web Interface. US Dept. of the Interior.http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/.