A procedural approach to distributing responsibilities in R&D networks

Poiesis und Praxis

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 169-188

  Doorn, Neelke ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958453280     PISSN: 16156609     EISSN: 16156617     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10202-010-0086-2     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Argyris C, Schön DA (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
2. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (1994) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, New York.
3. Bovens M (1998) The quest for responsibility. Accountability and citizenship in complex organisations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Brown HS, Vergragt P, Green K, Berchicci L (2003) Learning for sustainability transition through bounded socio-technical experiments in personal mobility. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 15(3): 291-315.
5. Callon M, Laredo P, Rabeharisoa V, Gonard T, Leray T (1992) The management and evaluation of technological programs and the dynamics of techno-economic networks: The case of the AFME. Res Policy 21: 215-236.
6. Cohen J (1989) Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In: Hamlin A, Pettit PH (eds) The good polity: normative analysis of the state. Blackwell, Oxford.
7. Cohen J (1997) Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In: Bohman J, Rehg W (eds) Deliberative democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge.
8. Daniels N (1996) Justice and justification. Reflective equilibrium in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Degrazia D (1992) Moving forward in bioethical theory-theories, cases, and specified principlism. J Med Philos 17(5): 511-539.
10. Doorn N (2010a) Applying Rawlsian approaches to resolve ethical issues: inventory and setting of a research agenda. J Bus Ethics 91(1): 127-143.
11. Doorn N (2010b) A Rawlsian approach to distribute responsibilities in networks. Sci Eng Ethics 16(2): 221-249.
12. Doorn N (forthcoming) Responsibilities within an ambient assisted living healthcare project. In: Proceedings of the conference "ICT that makes the difference". Brussels.
13. Dower N (2004) Global economy, justice and sustainability. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 7(4): 399-415.
14. Dryzek JS, Niemeyer S (2006) Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals. Am J Pol Sci 50(3): 634-649.
15. Elster J (1986) The market and the forum. In: Elster J, Hylland A (eds) Deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 103-132.
16. Elster J (1998) Deliberation and constitution making. In: Elster J (ed) Deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 97-122.
17. Fischer F (1980) Politics, values, and public policy. Westview Press, Inc, Boulder.
18. Fischer F (1995) Evaluating public policy. Nelson-Hall, Chicago.
19. Forsyth DR (1980) A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. J Pers Soc Psychol 39(1): 175-184.
20. Forsyth DR, Bye JL, Kelley KN (1988) Idealism, relativism, and the ethic of caring. J Psychol 122(3): 243-248.
21. Gert B, Culver CM, Clouser KD (1997) Bioethics: a return to fundamentals. Oxford University Press, New York.
22. Goodin RE (1995) Utilitarianism as a public philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Habermas J (1990) Moral consciousness and communicative action. MIT Press, Cambridge.
24. Habermas J (1995) Reconciliation through the public use of reason: remarks on John Rawls's political liberalism. J Philos 92(3): 109-131.
25. Hardin R (1999) From bodo ethics to distributive justice. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 2(4): 399-413.
26. Hare RM (1988) Why do applied ethics? In: Rosenthal DM, Shehadi F (eds) Applied ethics and ethical theory. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp 71-83.
27. Hilhorst MT (2005) Directed altruistic living organ donation: partial but not unfair. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 8(1-2): 197-215.
28. Holmgren M (1987) Wide reflective equilibrium and objective moral truth. Metaphilosophy 18(2): 108-124.
29. Hoogma R, Weber M, Elzen B (2001) Integrated long-term strategies to induce regume shifts to sustainability. Towards environmental innovation systems. Eibsee, Germany.
30. Ladd J (1991) Bhopal-an essay on moral responsibility and civic virtue. J Soc Philos 32(1): 73-91.
31. Little MO (1999) Abortion, intimacy, and the duty to gestate. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 2(3): 295-312.
32. Lustig BA (1992) The method of principlism-a critique of the critique. J Med Philos 17(5): 487-510.
33. McCarthy T (1994) Kantian constructivism and reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in dialogue. Ethics 105(1): 44-63.
34. Mouffe C (1999) Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism? Soc Res 66(3): 745-758.
35. Mouffe C (2000) The democratic paradox. Verso, London.
36. Nagel T (1979) Mortal questions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Nihlén Fahlquist J (2006) Responsibility ascriptions and vision zero. Accid Anal Prev 38: 1113-1118.
38. Oakley J, Cocking D (2001) Virtue ethics and professional roles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
39. Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York.
40. Rawls J (1995) Political liberalism: reply to Habermas. J Philos 92(3): 132-180.
41. Rawls J (1999 [1971]) A theory of justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
42. Rawls J (2001) Justice as fairness. A restatement. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Ma.).
43. Rogers JD, Bozeman B (2001) "Knowledge value alliances": an alternative to the r& d project focus in evaluation. Sci Technol Human Values 26(1): 23-55.
44. Saari E, Miettinen R (2001) Dynamics of change in research work: constructing a new research area in a research group. Sci Technol Human Values 26(3): 300-321.
45. Sabatier PA, Jenkins-Smith HC (1993) Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Westview Press, Inc, Boulder.
46. Scanlon TM (1982) Contractualism and utilitarianism. In: Sen AK, Williams BAO (eds) Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 128-130.
47. Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York.
48. Senge PM (1990) The leader's New Work: building learning organizations. Sloan Manage Rev 32(1): 7-23.
49. St. John J (2007) Problems with theory, problems with practice: wide reflective equilibrium and bioethics. S Afr J Philos 26(2): 204-215.
50. Thompson DF (1980) Moral responsibility and public officials. Am Pol Sci Rev 74: 905-916.
51. van de Poel IR, Zwart SD (2010) Reflective equilibrium in R& D networks. Sci Technol Human Values 35(2): 174-199.
52. van den Hoven MJ (1997) Computer ethics and moral methodology. Metaphilosophy 28(3): 234-248.
53. van der Burg S (2009) Imagining the future of photoacoustic mammography. Sci Eng Ethics 15(1): 97-110.
54. van Hooft S (2006) Understanding virtue ethics. Acumen Publishing, Chesham.
55. Williams G (2008) Responsibility as a virtue. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 11(4): 455-470.
56. Young IM (1996) Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy. In: Benhabib S (ed) Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
57. Young IM (2000) Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.