Determinants of operational efficiencies in the Indian pharmaceutical industry

International Transactions in Operational Research

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 109-130

  Saranga, Haritha ^a   Phani, B V ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT BANGALORE   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR   (India)

Author keywords

Age; Data envelopment analysis; Innovation; OR practice; Ownership; Regression; Relative efficiency

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958186261     PISSN: 09696016     EISSN: 14753995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2009.00668.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahn, T., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., 1988. Efficiency characterizations in different DEA models. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 22, 6, 253–257.
2. Arrow, K., 1962. The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies 29, 3, 153–173.
3. Banker, R.D., 1993. Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: a statistical foundation. Management Science 39, 10, 1265–1273.
4. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30, 1078–1092.
5. Banker, R.D., Chang, H., Natarajan, R., 2002. Nonparametric analysis of productivity change and technical progress. Working Paper, The University of Texas at Dallas.
6. Bean, A.S., 1995. Why some R&D organizations are more productive than others. Research Technology Management 38, 1, 25–29.
7. Belsey, D., Kuh, E., Welcsh, R., 1980. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
8. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A.Y., Seiford, L.M., 1994. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Application. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Hingham, MA, pp. 253–272.
9. Chaudhuri, S., 1999. Growth and structural changes in the pharmaceutical industry in India. In: Sen, A., Gokarn, S., Vaidya, R. (eds) The Structure of Indian Industry. Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
10. Coelli, T.J., Prasada Rao, D.S., O'Donnell, C.J., Battese, G.E., 2005. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (2nd edn), Springer, New York.
11. Cygnus 2004. Industry Insight – Indian Pharmaceutical. Cygnus Economic & Business Research, Hyderabad, India, pp. 32–34.
12. Haley, G.T., 1997. A strategic perspective on overseas Chinese networks' decision making. Management Decision 35, 8, 587–594.
13. Haley, G.T., Haley, U.C.V., 1997. Making strategic business decisions in South and Southeast Asia. Conference Proceedings of the First International Conference on Operations and Quantitative Management, Jaipur, India, Volume II, 597–560.
14. Haley, G.T., Haley, U.C.V., 1998. Boxing with shadows: competing effectively with the overseas Chinese and overseas Indian business networks in the Asian Arena. Journal of Organizational Change Management, Special Issue on “Strategic Dimensions of Organizational Change and Restructuring in the Asia Pacific: Strategies for Foreign Investors” 11, 4, 301–320.
15. ICRA 2002. The Indian Pharmaceutical Industry, ICRA Industry Watch Series. ICRA Limited, Mumbai.
16. Khanna, T., Palepu, K., 2000. Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance 55, 2, 867–891.
17. Khanna, T., Rivkin, J.W., 2001. Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal 22, 1, 45–74.
18. Levin, R.C., 1988. Appropriability, R&D spending and technological performance. The American Economic Review 78, 2, 424–428.
19. March, J.G., 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2, 71–87.
20. Morck, R., Yeung, B.Y., 2004. Special issues relating to corporate governance and family control. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3406.
21. Pradhan, J.P., 2003. Liberalization, firm size and R&D performance: a firm level study of Indian pharmaceutical industry. Research and Information System for the Non-Aligned and Other Developing Countries, RIS-DP # 40/2003.
22. Rosenzweig, E.D., Roth, A.V., 2004. Towards a theory of competitive progression: evidence from high-tech manufacturing. Production and Operations Management Journal Winter, 354–368.
23. Saha, A., Ravisankar, T.S., 2000. Rating of Indian commercial banks: A DEA approach. European Journal of Operation Research 124, 187–203.
24. Saranga, H., 2007. Multiple objective data envelopment analysis as applied to the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society 58, 1480–1493.
25. Smith, P., 1990. Data envelopment analysis applied to financial statements. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science 18, 131–138.
26. Stinchcombe, A.L., 1965. Social structures and organizations. In: March, J.G. (ed) Handbook of Organizations. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 142–193.
27. Thompson, R.G., Langemeier, L.N., Lee, C.T., Lee, E., Thrall, R.M., 1990. The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas Farming. Journal of Econometrics 46, 93–108.