Patinformatics as a business process: A guideline through patent research tasks and tools

World Patent Information

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 291-299

  Moehrle, M G ^a   Walter, L ^a   Bergmann, I ^a   Bobe, Sebastian ^a   Skrzipale, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Discovered knowledge; Event driven process chain; Patent analysis; Patent research tasks; Patent research tool; Patinformatics; Pre processing; Process modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958164932     PISSN: 01722190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wpi.2009.11.003     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Trippe A.J. Patinformatics: identifying haystacks from space. Searcher 2002, 10(9):28.
2. Trippe A.J. Patinformatics: tasks and tools. World Patent Inf 2003, 25(3):211-221.
3. Tseng Y.H., Lin C.J., Lin Y.I. Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Inf Process Manage 2007, 43:1216-1247.
4. Yang Y.Y., Akers L., Klose T., Barcelon Yang C. Text mining and visualization tools - impressions of emerging capabilities. World Patent Inf 2008, 30:280-293.
5. Bonino D., Ciaramella A., Corno F. Review of the state-of-the-art in patent information and forthcoming evolutions in intelligent patent informatics. World Patent Inf 2010, 32(1):30-38.
6. Scheer A.W. ARIS: business process modelling 1998, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
7. Becker J., Kugeler M., Rosemann M. Process management - a guide for the design of business processes 2003, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
8. Foglia P. Patentability search strategies and the reformed IPC: a patent office perspective. World Patent Inf 2007, 29(1):33-53.
9. Vijvers W. The international patent classification as a search tool. World Patent Inf 1990, 12(1):26-30.
10. Rampelmann J. Classification and the future of the IPC - the EPO view. World Patent Inf 1999, 21:183-190.
11. Krier M., Francesco Z. Automatic categorisation applications at the European patent office. World Patent Inf 2002, 24(3):187-196.
12. Kukich K. Techniques for automatically correcting words in text. ACM Comput Surv 1992, 24:377-439.
13. Fugmann R. Content exploration by means of indexing: principles and practical experience (German). Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Dokumentation, Frankfurt am Main; 1999.
14. van der Meulen W.A., Janssen P.J.F.C. Automatic versus manual indexing. Inf Process Manage 1977, 13(1):13-21.
15. Pulgarín A., Gil-Leiva I. Bibliometric analysis of the automatic indexing literature: 1956-2000. Inf Process Manage 2004, 40:365-377.
16. Anderson J., Pérez-Carbello J. The nature of indexing: how humans and machines analyse messages and texts for retrieval. Part I: research, and the nature of human indexing. Inf Process Manage 2001, 37:231-254.
17. Maletic J., Marcus A. Data cleansing: a prelude to knowledge discovery. The data mining and knowledge discovery handbook 2005, Springer-Verlag. O. Maimon, L. Rokach (Eds.).
18. Müller, Heiko, Freytag, Johann-Christoph. Problems, methods, and challenges in comprehensive data cleansing. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany. Online resource: [download from 17.08.2009]. http://www.dbis.informatik.hu-berlin.de/fileadmin/research/papers/techreports/2003-hub_ib_164-mueller.pdf.
19. Derendyaev B., Bogdanova T., Piottukh-Peletsky V., Makarov L. Fast taxonomy of chemical structures selected from IR spectral database. Anal Chim Acta 2003, 210-216.
20. Große D., Fey G., Drechsler R. SATRIX: Algorithmen fuer Boolesche Erfuellbarkeit 2007, Shaker Verlag.
21. Salton G. A simple blueprint for automatic Boolean query processing. Inf Process Manage 1988, 24(3):269-280.
22. Fox E., Betrabet S., Koushik M., Lee W. Extended Boolean models. Information retrieval: data structures and algorithms 1992, 393-418. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. W. Frakes, R. Baeza-Yares (Eds.).
23. Lee J.H., Kim M.H., Lee Y.J. Ranking documents in thesaurus-based Boolean retrieval systems. Inf Process Manage 1994, 30(1):79-91.
24. Bhogal J., Macfarlane A., Smith P. A review of ontology based query expansion. Inf Process Manage 2007, 43:866-886.
25. Dixon R.M.W. A new approach to English grammar, on semantic principles 1992, Oxford University Press.
26. Deerwester S., Dumais S., Furnas G., Landauer T., Harshman R. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci 1990, 41(6):391-407.
27. Ryley J.F., Saffer J., Gibbs A. Advanced document retrieval techniques for patent research. World Patent Inf 2008, 30:238-243.
28. Bergmann I., Butzke D., Walter L., Fuerste J.P., Moehrle M.G., Erdmann V.A. Evaluating the risk of patent infringement by means of semantic patent analysis: the case of DNA-chips. R&D Manage 2008, 38(5):550-562.
29. Moehrle MG, Geritz A. Developing acquisition strategies based on patent maps. In: Khalil, Tarek, Hosni, Yasser, editors. IAMOT 2004 - new directions in technology management: changing collaboration between government, industry and university. Washington, DC; 2004. p. 1-9.
30. Rip A., Courtial J. Co-word maps of biotechnology: an example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics 1984, 6:381-400.
31. Callon M., Courtial J., Laville F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 1991, 22:155-205.
32. von Wartburg I., Teichert T., Rost K. Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Res Policy 2005, 34(10):1591-1607.
33. Giri N.C. Multivariate statistical analysis: revised and expanded 2004, CRC Press. 2nd ed.
34. List J. How drawings could enhance retrieval in mechanical and device patent searching. World Patent Inf 2007, 29(3):210-218.
35. Dickerson R, Gray H, Haight G. Prinzipien der Chemie. Walter de Gruyter, issue 2; 1978.
36. Zanibbi R., Blostein D., Cordy J. A survey of table recognition models, observations, transformations, and inferences. IJDAR 2004, 1-16.
37. Morris S., DeYong C., Wu Z., Salman S., Yemenu D. DIVA: a visualization system for exploring document databases for technology forecasting. Comp Ind Eng 2002, 43:841-862.
38. Radauer A., Walter L. Elements of good practice of publicly funded patent database and information services for SMEs - selected results of a benchmarking exercise. World Patent Inf 2010, 32(3):237-245.
39. Sternitzke C., Bartkowski A., Schramm R. Regional PATLIB centres as integrated one-stop service providers for intellectual property services. World Patent Inf 2007, 29:241-245.
40. Wurzer A., Hundertmark S. Route to profitable European PATLIB centres with a process oriented business model in intellectual property services. World Patent Inf 2005, 27:302-308.
41. Krestel H., Goetz B. From information supplier to system provider: the diversification of patent information services at patent information centres. World Patent Inf 2002, 24:143-145.
42. Andrick J. Providing modern information services for small and medium-sized enterprises. World Patent Inf 1998, 20:107-110.