The population health record: Concepts, definition, design, and implementation

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 359-366

  Friedman, Daniel J ^a   Parrish II, R Gibson ^b  

^a Population and Public Health Information Services   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; DEMOGRAPHY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH; HEALTH CARE FINANCING; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RECORD; POLITICS; POPULATION HEALTH RECORD; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; STUDY DESIGN; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; METHODOLOGY; NOMENCLATURE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PUBLIC HEALTH INFORMATICS; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77958158864     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.2009.001578     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Institute of Medicine (US). Roundtable on evidence-based medicine. In: Olsen L, Aisner D, McGinnis JM, eds. The learning healthcare system: workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2007.
2. White KL. Healing the schism: epidemiology, medicine, and the public's health. New York NY: Springer-Verlag, 1991.
3. American Medical Informatics Association, Board of Directors. A proposal to improve quality, increase efficiency, and expand access in the US health care system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997;4:340-1.
4. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Assuring a health dimension for the national information infrastructure. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services (US), 1998.
5. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Toward a national health information infrastructure. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services (US), 2000.
6. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Information for health: a strategy for building the national health information infrastructure. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services (US), 2001.
7. Detmer DE. Building the national health information infrastructure for personal health, health care services, public health, and research. BMC Med Inform Decision Mak 2003;3:1.
8. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TR 20514: Health informaticsdelectronic health recordddefinition, scope, and context. Geneva: ISO, 2005.
9. Detmer DE, Bloomrosen M, Raymond B, et al. Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med Inform Decision Mak 2008;8:45.
10. Friedman DJ, Hunter EL, Parrish RG. Shaping a health statistics vision for the 21st century, Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services (US), 2002.
11. World Health Organization. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final report of the Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.
12. Blue Ridge Academic Health Group. The role of academic health centers in addressing the social determinants of health. Report 14. Atlanta, GA: Emory University, 2010.
13. Evans RG, Stoddart GL. Consuming research, producing policy? Am J Public Health 2003;93:371-9.
14. Friedman DJ, Starfield B. Models of population health: their value for US public health practice, policy, and research. Am J Public Health 2003;93:366-9.
15. Krieger N. Ladders, pyramids, and champagne: the iconography of health inequities. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008;62:1098-104.
16. Last JM, Spasoff RA, Harris SS, et al, eds. A dictionary of epidemiology. 4th edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001:136-7.
17. Young TK. Population health: concepts and methods. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2005.
18. Parrish RG, Friedman DJ, Hunter EL. Defining health statistics and their scope. In: Friedman DJ, Hunter EL, Parrish RG, eds. Health statistics: shaping policy and practice to improve the population's health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2005:3-23.
19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About bioSense. Atlanta, GA: CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/biosense/(accessed 24 Sep 2009).
20. Diamond CW, Mostashari F, Shirky C. Collecting and sharing data for population health: a new paradigm. Health Aff 2009;28:454-66.
21. Lazarus R, Yih K, Platt R. Distributed data processing for public health surveillance. BMC Public Health 2006;6:235. doi:1186/1471-2458-6-235.
22. McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Barnes M, et al. The Indiana Network for Patient Care: a working local health information infrastructure. Health Aff 2005;24:1214-20.
23. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Primary care information project. New York, NY: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/pcip/pcip.shtml (accessed 3 Apr 2009).
24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Detailed definition of PHIN. Atlanta, GA: CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/phin/about.html (accessed 24 Sep 2009).
25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC WONDER. Atlanta, GA: CDC. http://wonder.cdc.gov/(accessed 15 Sep 2009).
26. Friedman DJ, Parrish RG. Characteristics and desired functionalities of state web-based data query systems. J Public Health Manag Pract 2006;12:119-29.
27. National Cancer Institute. SEER cancer query systems. Rockville, MD: National Cancer Institute (US). http://seer.cancer.gov/canques/(accessed 15 Sep 2009).
28. Institute of Medicine. Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research, report brief. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2009.
29. Institute of Medicine. Race, ethnicity, and language data: standardization for health care quality improvement, report brief. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2009.
30. Eysenbach G. Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness. J Med Internet Res 2008;10:e22.
31. Hardey M. Public health and web 2.0. J R Soc Promot Health 2008;128:181-9.
32. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/DIS 18308.2: health informaticsdrequirements for an electronic health record architecture. Geneva: ISO, 2009.
33. Rudolph BA, Shah GH, Love D. Small numbers, disclosure risk, security, and reliability issues in web-based data query systems. J Public Health Manag Pract 2006;12:176-83.
34. Stoto MA. Statistical issues in web-based data query systems. In: Friedman DJ, Parrish RG, eds. Issues in evaluating web-based data query systems. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2008:56-61.
35. Blumenthal D, DesRoches C, Donelan K, et al. Health information technology in the United States: the information base for progress. Princeton, NJ: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2006.
36. Congressional Budget Office. Evidence on the costs and benefits of health information technology. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office (US), 2008.
37. Halamka J, Overhage JM, Ricciardi L, et al. Exchanging health information: local distribution, national coordination. Health Aff 2005;24:1170-9.
38. Middleton B. Achieving US health information technology adoption: the need for a third hand. Health Aff 2005;24:1269-72.
39. Middleton B, Hammond EW, Brennan PF, et al. US EHR adoption: how to get there from here. Recommendations based on the 2004 ACMI retreat. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:13-19.
40. Friedman DJ, Cohen BB, Averbach AR, et al. Race/ethnicity and OMB directive 15: implications for state public health practice. Am J Public Health 2000;90:1714-19.
41. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Welcome to WISQARS. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html (accessed 15 Sep 2009).
42. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral risk factor surveillance system. Atlanta, GA: CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/BRFSS/(accessed 15 Sep 2009).
43. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Data access: health data interactive. Atlanta, GA: CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hdi.htm (accessed 15 Sep 2009).
44. Penfield SL, Anderson KM, Edmunds M, et al. Toward health information liquidity: realization of better, more efficient care from the free flow of health information. Rockville: Booz Allen Hamilton, 2009.
45. Reti SB, Feldman HJ, Safran C. Governance for personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:14-17.
46. Yasnoff WA, Overhage JM, Humphreys BL, et al. A national agenda for public health informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001;8:535-45.
47. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Electronic Disease Surveillance System. Atlanta, GA: CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/nedss/(accessed 2 Apr 2010).
48. National Cancer Institute. Welcome to the caBIG® community website. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute. http://cabig.nci.nih.gov/(accessed 2 Apr 2010).
49. MedBiquitous. MedBiquitous about us. Baltimore: MedBiquitous Consortium. http://www.medbiq.org/about_us/index.html (accessed 2 Apr 2010).
50. Stead WW, Kelly BJ, Kolodner RM. Achievable steps toward building a National Health Information Infrastructure in the United States. J Am Medical Informatics Assoc 2005;12:113-20.
51. Safran C, Bloomrosen M, Hammond WE, et al. Toward a national framework for the secondary use of health data: an American Medical Informatics Association white paper. J Am Medical Informatics Assoc 2007;14:1-9.
52. Institute of Medicine (US). Committee on Improving the Patient Record. In: Detmer DE, Steen EB, Dick RS, eds. The computer-based patient record: an essential technology for health care. Revised edn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997.
53. Hammond WE. Electronic medical recordsdgetting it right and going to scale. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund, 2004.
54. Hayrinen K, Saranto K, Nykanen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int J Med Inform 2008;77:291-304.
55. Humphreys BL. Electronic health record meets digital library: a new environment for achieving an old goal. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000;7:444-52.
56. Connecting for Health, Markle Foundation. Decision-making for population healthd" first principles". New York, NY: Markle Foundation. http://www.connectingforhealth.org/resources?first_principles.pdf (accessed May 2010).
57. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reproductive health: glossary. Atlanta, GA: CDC. http://www.cdc.gov/ReproductiveHealth/EpiGlossary/glossary.htm (accessed 19 Aug 2009).
58. Kindig DA. Understanding population health terminology. Milbank Mem Fund Q 2007;85:139-61.
59. Friedman DJ. Assessing the potential of national strategies for electronic health records for population health monitoring and research. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2(143). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2006.
60. W3C Working Group. Web services glossary: W3C working group note 11 February 2004. W3C. http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-gloss/(accessed 26 Sep 2009).
61. US Census Bureau. Centers for disease control and prevention. dataferret: for the dataweb. Washington, DC: Census Bureau (US). http://dataferrett.census.gov/TheDataWeb/index.html (accessed 6 Oct 2009).