Comparison of accuracy of intraocular lens calculations using automated keratometry, a placido-based corneal topographer, and a combined placido-based and dual scheimpflug corneal topographer

Cornea

Volumn 29, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1136-1138

  Shirayama, Mariko ^a,b   Wang, Li ^a   Koch, Douglas D ^a   Weikert, Mitchell P ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

corneal anterior and posterior corneal surface; corneal power; Galilei dual Scheimpflug analyzer; IOL power calculation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHER; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; KERATOMETRY; LENS IMPLANT; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 77958154061     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181d3d689     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:368-376. (Pubitemid 351625583)
2. Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18:125-129. (Pubitemid 23237029)
3. Shirayama M, Wang L, Weikert MP, et al. Comparison of corneal powers obtained from four different devices. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148: 528-535.
4. Cuaycong MJ, Gay CA, Emery J, et al. Comparison of the accuracy of computerized videokeratography and keratometry for use in intraocular lens calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19(Suppl):178-181. (Pubitemid 23232524)
5. Husain SE, Kohnen T, Maturi R, et al. Computerized videokeratography and keratometry in determining intraocular lens calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:326-336. (Pubitemid 26118658)
6. Menassa N, Kaufmann C, Goggin M, et al. Comparison and reproducibility of corneal thickness and curvature readings obtained by the Galilei and the Orbscan II analysis systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;10:1742-1747.
7. Shammas HJ, Hoffer KJ, Shammas MC. Scheimpflug photography keratometry readings for routine intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:330-334.
8. Langenbucher A, Torres F, Behren A, et al. Consideration of the posterior corneal curvature for assessment of corneal power after myopic LASIK. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004;82:264-269. (Pubitemid 38714641)
9. Twa MD, Roberts C, Mahmound AM, et al. Response of the posterior corneal surface to laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:61-71. (Pubitemid 40260692)
10. Anera RG, Jimenez JR, Jimenez del Barco L, et al. Changes in corneal asphericity after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:762-768. (Pubitemid 36418018)