Assessing the influence of import-coupling on OCL expression maintainability: A cognitive theory-based perspective

Information Sciences

Volumn 180, Issue 20, 2010, Pages 3837-3862

  Reynoso, Luis ^a   Manso, Esperanza ^b   Genero, Marcela ^c   Piattini, Mario ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL COMAHUE   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cognitive models; Comprehensibility; Experiments; Import coupling; Maintainability; Mental models; Meta analysis; Modifiability; OCL expressions; Software measures; UML OCL models

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE MODEL; COMPREHENSIBILITY; IMPORT-COUPLING; MENTAL MODEL; META-ANALYSIS; MODIFIABILITY; OCL EXPRESSIONS; SOFTWARE MEASURES; UML/OCL MODELS;

EXPERIMENTS; MAINTAINABILITY; NAVIGATION;

DATA FLOW ANALYSIS;

EID: 77958151578     PISSN: 00200255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2010.06.028     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. C. Atkinson, and T. Kühne Model-driven development: a metamodeling foundation IEEE Software 20 5 2003 36 41
2. V. Basili, F. Shull, and F. Lanubile Building knowledge through families of experiments IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25 1999 456 473
3. V. Basili, and A. Weiss Methodology for collecting valid software engineering data IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 10 6 1984 728 738
4. Biostat, Inc., Meta-Analysis v2, 2006, .
5. D.A. Boehm-Davis, J.E. Fox, B. Philips, Techniques for exploring program comprehension, in: D.A. Boehm-Davis, W.D. Gray (Eds.), Empirical Studies of Programmers, Sixth Workshop, Norwood, Ablex, 1996, pp. 3-37.
6. L.C. Briand, J.W. Daly, and J. Wüst A unified framework for coupling measurement in object-oriented systems IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering 25 1 1999 91 121
7. L.C. Briand, Y. Labiche, M. Di Penta, and H. Yan-Bondoc An experimental investigation of formality in UML-based development IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31 10 2005 833 884
8. L.C. Briand, J. Wüst, S. Ikonomovski, H. Lounis, A comprehensive investigation of quality factors in object-oriented designs: an industrial case study, Technical Report ISERN-98-29, International Software Engineering Research Network, 1998.
9. L.C. Briand, J. Wüst, S. Ikonomovski, H. Lounis, Investigating quality factors in object-oriented designs: an industrial case-study, in: Proc. 21st Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, Los Angeles, CA, 1999, pp. 345-354.
10. L.C. Briand, J. Wüst, and H. Lounis Replicated case studies for investigating quality factors in object-oriented designs Empirical Software Engineering 6 1 2001 11 58
11. D.E. Broadbent The magic number seven after fifteen years A. Kennedy, A. Wilkes, Studies in Long-term Memory 1975 Wiley London 3 18
12. J. Burkhardt, F. Detienne, and S. Wiedenbeck Object-oriented program comprehension: effect of expertise, task and phase Empirical Software Engineering 7 2 2002 115 156
13. J.M. Burkhardt, F. Detienne, S. Wiedenbeck, The effect of object-oriented programming expertise in several dimensions of comprehension strategies, in: Proc. Sixth Int. Workshop on Program Comprehension, Washington, DC, USA, 1998, pp. 82-89.
14. J. Cabot, M. Gogolla, and P. Van Gorp Eighth International Workshop on OCL Concepts and Tools, Models in Software Engineering: Workshops and Symposia at MODELS 2008, France LNCS vol. 5421 2009 Springer 257 262
15. J. Cabot, E. Teniente, Transforming OCL constraints: a context change approach, in: Proc. of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 2006, pp. 1196-1201.
16. J. Cabot, and E. Teniente Transformation techniques for OCL constraints Science of Computing Program 68 3 2007 179 195
17. C. Calero, M. Piattini, M. Genero, Method for obtaining correct metrics, in: Proc. of the Third Int. Conf. on Enterprise and Information Systems, Setubal, Portugal, 2001, pp. 779-784.
18. S.N. Cant, B. Henderson-Sellers, and D.R. Jeffery Application of cognitive complexity metrics to object oriented programs Object Oriented Programming 7 4 1994 52 63
19. D.N. Card, K. El Emam, B. Scalzo, Measurement of object-oriented software development projects, Software Productivity Consortium, Herndon, Virgina, USA, 2001.
20. E. Cariou, R. Marvie, L. Seinturier, L. Duchien, OCL for the specification of model transformation contracts, in: Workshop OCL and Model Driven Engineering of the Seventh Int. Conf. on UML Modeling Languages and Applications, Lisbon, Portugal, 2004, pp. 69-83.
21. V.M. Chieu, E. Milgrom, and M. Frenay Constructivist learning: operational criteria for cognitive flexibility Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT'04, Washington, DC, USA 2004 IEEE Computer Society 221 225
22. S. Cook, A. Kleepe, R. Mitchell, B. Rumpe, J. Warmer, and A. Wills The Amsterdam Manifesto on OCL Object Modeling with the OCL, The Rationale Behind the Object Constraint Language LNCS vol. 2263 2002 Springer Berlin, London, UK
23. C.L. Corritore, S. Wiedenbeck, Direction and scope of comprehension-related activities by procedural and object-oriented programmers: an empirical study, in: Proc. Eighth Int. Workshop on Program Comprehension, Washington, DC, USA, 2000, pp. 139-148.
24. N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 1 2001 87 114
25. J.A. Cruz-Lemus, M. Genero, E. Manso, and M. Piattini Assessing the understandability of UML statechart diagrams with composite states - a family of empirical studies Empirical Software Engineering 14 6 2009 685 719
26. D.P. Darcy, and S.A. Slaughter The structural complexity of software, an experimental test IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31 11 2005 982 995
27. B. Demuth, H. Hussmann, Using UML/OCL constraints for relational database design, in: Proc. Second Int. Conf. on the Unified Modeling Language, 1999, pp. 598-613.
28. B. Demuth, H. Hussmann, and S. Loecher OCL as a specification language for business rules in data base applications M. Gogolla, C. Kobryn, UML 2001 - The Unified Modeling Language, Fourth Int. Conf., Toronto, Canada LNCS vol. 2185 2001 Springer 104 117
29. T. Dyb, E. Arisholm, D.I.K. Sjøberg, J.E. Hannay, and F. Shull Are two heads better than one? on the effectiveness of pair programming IEEE Software 24 6 2007 10 13
30. K. El-Emam, Object-Oriented metrics: a review of theory and practice, Technical Report NRC 44190, National Research Council Canada, Institute for Information Technology, 2001.
31. J. Erickson, and K. Siau Theoretical and practical complexity of modeling methods Communication of the ACM 50 8 2007 46 51
32. E. Fernández-Medina, M. Piattini, Extending OCL for secure database development, in: Int. Conf. on UML, 2004, pp. 380-394.
33. F. Garcia, M. Serrano, J. Lemus, F. Ruiz, and M. Piattini Managing software process measurement: a metamodel-based approach Information Sciences 177 2007 2570 2586
34. M. Genero, M.E. Manso, A. Visaggio, M. Piattini, and G. Canfora Building measure-based prediction models for UML class diagram maintainability Empirical Software Engineering 12 5 2007 517 549
35. M. Genero, M. Piattini, and C. Calero Metrics for software conceptual models 2005 Imperial College Press
36. M. Giese, R Heldal, From informal to formal specification in UML, in: Proc. Seventh Inter. Conf. on Unified Modelling Language, LNCS, vol. 3273, 2004, pp. 197-211.
37. M. Giese, D. Larsson, Simplifying transformation of OCL constraints, in: L. Briand, C. Williams (Eds.), Proc. Eighth ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, Montego Bay, Jamaica, LNCS, vol. 3713, 2005, pp. 309-323.
38. G.V. Glass, B. McGaw, and M.L. Smith Meta-analysis in Social Research 1981 Sage Publications
39. C. Glezer, M. Last, E. Nachmany, and P. Shoval Quality and comprehension of UML interaction diagrams - an experimental comparison Information and Software Technology 47 10 2005 675 692
40. R. Gopal, Dynamic program slicing based on dependence relations, in: Proc. Conf. on Software Maintenance, Sorrento, Italy, 1991, pp. 191-200.
41. M. Grossman, J.E. Aronson, and R.V. McCarthy Does UML make the grade? Insights from the software development community Information and Software Technology 47 6 2005 383 397
42. R. Hähnle, A. Ranta, Connecting OCL with the rest of the world, in: J. Whittle (Ed.), ETAPS Workshop on Transformations in UML, WTUML 2001, Genova, Italy, 2001.
43. A. Hamie, F. Civello, J. Howse, S. Kent, R. Mitchell, Reflections on the object constraint language, in: Proc. First Int. Workshop on the Unified Modeling Language, LNCS, vol. 1618, 1999, pp. 162-172.
44. W. Hayes, Research in software engineering: a case for meta-analysis, in: Proc. Sixth IEEE Int. Symposium on Software Metrics, METRICS'99, Boca Raton, USA, 1999, pp. 143-151.
45. L.V. Hedges, and I. Olkin Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis 1985 Academia Press
46. B. Henderson-Sellers Object-oriented Metrics: Measures of Complexity 1996 Prentice-Hall
47. M. Höst, B. Regnell, C. Wohlin, Using students as subjects - a comparative study of students and professionals in lead-time impact assessment, in: Proc. Fourth Conf. on Empirical Assessment and Evaluation in Software Engineering, EASE '00, Keele, UK, 2000, pp. 201-214.
48. ISO/IEC Standard ISO 9126, Software Product Evaluation-quality Characteristics and Guidelines for Their Use, Geneva, 1991.
49. N. Juristo, and A. Moreno Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
50. V. Kampenes, T. Dyb, J.E. Hannay, and D.I.K. Sjøberg A systematic review of effect size in software engineering experiments Information and Software Technology 49 11-12 2007 1073 1086
51. B. Kitchenham, S. Pflegger, and N. Fenton Towards a framework for software measurement validation IEEE Transactions of Software Engineering 21 12 1995 929 944
52. T.A. Klemola, A cognitive model for complexity metrics, in: H.A. Sahraoui, G. Poels, F. Brito e Abreu, H. Zuse (Eds.), Proc. of the Fourth Int. ECOOP Workshop on Quantitative Approaches in Object-Oriented Software Engineering, Sophia Antipolis and Cannes, France, 2000.
53. C. Knight, M. Munro, Program comprehension experiences with GXL; comprehension for comprehension, in: Proc. 10th Int. Workshop on Program Comprehension, Washington, DC, USA, 2002, pp. 147-156.
54. L. Kuzniarz, J.L. Sourouille, M. Staron, in: The First Workshop on Quality in Modeling, LNCS, vol. 4364, 2007, pp. 76-79.
55. O. Laitenberger, K. El-Emam, and T. Harbich An internally replicated quasi-experimental comparison of checklist and perspective-based reading of code documents IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 27 5 2001 387 421
56. C.F.J. Lange, M.R.V. Chaudron, Interactive views to improve the comprehension of UML models - an experimental validation, in: Proc. 15th IEEE Int. Conf. on Program Comprehension, Alberta, Canada, 2007, pp. 221-230.
57. O.I. Lindland, G. Sindre, and A. Sølvberg Understanding quality in conceptual modeling IEEE Software 11 2 1994 42 49
58. D.C. Littman, J. Pinto, S. Letovsky, and E. Soloway Mental models and software maintenance System and Software 7 4 1987 341 355
59. D. Massey, Introduction to OCL in Together Products, 2004, .
60. G.A. Miller The magical number 7, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity of processing information The Psychological Review 63 2 1956 81 97
61. J. Miller Applying meta-analytical procedures to software engineering experiments Systems and Software 54 1 2000 29 39
62. J. Miller, F. McDonald., Statistical Analysis of Two Experimental Studies, EFoCS-31-98, University of Strathclyde, 1998.
63. P. Mohagheghi, V. Dehlen, and T. Neple Definitions and approaches to model quality in model-based software development - a review of literature Information and Software Technology 51 12 2009 1646 1669
64. A. Mohan, N. Gold, Programming style changes in evolving source code, in: Proc. 12th IEEE Int. Workshop on Program Comprehension, Washington, DC, USA, 2004, pp. 236-240.
65. S. Murphy, S. Tilley, S. Huang, Fourth workshop on graphical documentation: UML style guidelines, in: Proc. of the 22nd Annual Int. Conf. on Design of Communication, New York, NY, USA, 2004, pp. 118-119.
66. D.A. Norman Some observations on mental models D. Gentner, A.L. Stevens, Mental Models 1983 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Hillsdale, USA 7 14
67. Object Management Group, UML 2.0, OMG Document, 2005, .
68. Object Management Group, UML 2.0 OCL, ptc/05-06-06, OCL FTF Report, OMG Document, 2005, .
69. M.C. Otero, and J.J. Dolado Evaluation of the comprehension of the dynamic modeling in UML Information and Software Technology 46 1 2004 35 53
70. J. Pardillo, J. Mazón, and J. Trujillo Extending OCL for OLAP querying on conceptual multidimensional models of data warehouses Information Sciences 180 5 2010 584 601
71. N. Pennington, Comprehension strategies in programming, in: E. Soloway, S. Iyengar (Eds.), Empirical Studies of Programmers: Second Workshop, Ablex, Norwood, NJ, USA, 1987, pp. 100-113.
72. G. Pollice, Formally Speaking: How to Apply OCL, 2004, Available at IBM Page .
73. H.C. Purchase, L. Colpoys, M. McGill, D. Carrington, UML collaboration diagram syntax: an empirical study of comprehension, in: Proc. First Int. Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis, 2002, pp. 13-22.
74. V. Rajlich, N. Wilde, The role of concepts in program comprehension, in: Proc. 10th Int. Workshop on Program Comprehension, Washington, DC, USA, 2002, pp. 271-278.
75. L. Reynoso, A measurement-based approach for assessing the influence of import-coupling on the maintainability of OCL expressions, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain, 2007.
76. L. Reynoso, J.A. Cruz-Lemus, M. Genero, M. Piattini, Formal definition of measures for UML statechart diagrams using OCL, in: Proc. 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2008, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil, 2008, pp. 846-847.
77. L. Reynoso, M. Genero, M. Piattini, Assessing the impact of coupling on the understandability and modifiability of OCL expressions within UML/OCL combined models, in: Proc. 11th IEEE Int. Software Metrics Symposium, 2005, p.14.
78. L. Reynoso, M. Genero, M. Piattini, OCL2: using OCL in the formal definition of OCL expression measures, in: Proc. First Workshop on Quality in Modeling QIM Co-located with the ACM/IEEE Ninth Int. Conf. on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, Genova, Italy, 2006, pp. 95-115.
79. L. Reynoso, M. Genero, M. Piattini, Using verbal protocols to assess the influence of import-coupling on the comprehensibility of OCL expressions, in: Proc. Sixth IEEE Int. Conf. on Cognitive Informatics, Lake Tahoe, CA, USA, 2007, pp. 440-449.
80. L. Reynoso, M. Genero, M. Piattini, E. Manso, Does object coupling really affect the understandability and modifiability of OCL expressions? in: Proc. 21st ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Dijon, France, 2006, pp. 1721-1727.
81. L. Reynoso, E. Rolón Aguilar, M. Genero, F. García, Francisco Ruiz, and M. Piattini Formal definition of measures for BPMN models A. Abran, R. Braungarten, R. Dumke, J.J. Cuadrado-Gallego, J. Brunekreef, Proc. Int. Conf. Software Process and Product Measurement, IWSM' 09 LNCS vol. 5891 2009 Springer-Verlag 285 306
82. R. Rosenthal Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research 1991 Sage Publications Newbury Park, CA
83. R. Rosenthal Parametric measures of effect size H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges, The Handbook of Research Synthesis 1994 Russell Sage Foundation New York 231 244
84. D.I.K. Sjøberg, J.E. Hannay, O. Hansen, V.B. Kampenes, A. Karahasanovic, N. Liborg, and A.C. Rekdal A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31 9 2005 733 753
85. SPSS 15.0. Syntax Reference Guide, Chicago, SPSS Inc., 2006.
86. M.A. Storey, Theories, methods and tools in program comprehension: past, present and future, in: Proc. 13th Int. Workshop on Program Comprehension, IWPC '05, Washington, DC, USA, 2005, pp. 181-191.
87. F.S.C. Tseng, and C. Chen Enriching the class diagram concepts to capture natural language semantics for database access Data and Knowledge Engineering 67 1 2008 1 29
88. J. Verelst, The influence of the level of abstraction on the evolvability of conceptual models of information systems, in: Proc. Third Int. Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, ISESE 2004, Redondo Beach, CA, USA, 2004, pp. 17-26.
89. R. Vinter, M. Loomes, and R. Kornbrot Applying software metrics to formal specifications: a cognitive approach Proc. of the Fifth Int. Symposium on Software Metrics, METRICS'98 1998 IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA 216 223
90. J. Warmer, and A. Kleppe The Object Constraint Language: Getting Your Models Ready for MDA second ed. 2003 Addison-Wesley MA, USA
91. C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Höst, M. Ohlson, B. Regnell, and A. Wesslén Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers Norwell, MA, USA
92. S. Yusuf, H. Kagdi, J.I. Maletic, Assessing the comprehension of UML class diagrams via eye tracking, in: Proc. 15th IEEE Int. Conf. on Program Comprehension, ICPC'07, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2007, pp. 113-122.