The perils of engagement a space for anthropology in the age of security?

Current Anthropology

Volumn 51, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2010, Pages

  Spencer, Jonathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958121110     PISSN: 00113204     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/653421     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Agamben, G. 1998. Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2. Bourdieu, P. 1990. The logic of practice. R. Nice, trans. Cambridge: Polity.
3. C.A.S.E. Collective. 2006. Critical approaches to security in Europe: a networked manifesto. Security Dialogue 37(4):443-487.
4. Davis, J. 1987. Libyan politics: tribe and revolution. London: Tauris.
5. Devji, F. 2005. Landscapes of the jihad: militancy, morality, modernity. London: Hurst.
6. Duffield, M. 2005. Getting savages to fight barbarians: development, security and the colonial present. Conflict, Security and Development 5(2):141-159.
7. Harper, I., and A. Corśn-Jiménez. 2005. Towards interactive professional ethics. Anthropology Today 21(6):10-12.
8. Hefner, R. 2010. Comment on Werbner. Current Anthropology 51(2): 210-211.
9. Jacob, M.-A., and A. Riles. 2007. Symposium: papering ethics, documenting consent: the new bureaucracies of virtue. Political and Legal Anthropology Review 30(2):181-327.
10. Keenan, J. 2007. Comment: my country right or wrong. Anthropology Today 23(1):26-28.
11. Kundnani, A. 2009. Spooked! how not to prevent violent extremism. London: Institute of Race Relations.
12. Laidlaw, J. 2002. For an anthropology of ethics and freedom. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, n.s., 8(2):311-332.
13. Lederman, R., ed. 2006. AE forum: IRBs, bureaucratic regulation, and academic freedom. American Ethnologist 33(4):477-548.
14. Mills, D. 2006. Briefing document for the international benchmarking review of social anthropology, April. http://www.esrc.ac.uk/ ESRCInfoCentre/Images/Social-Anthropology-Benchmarking -Review-Briefing-tcm6- 16603.pdf.
15. Mosse, D. 2005. Cultivating development: an ethnography of aid policy and practice. London: Pluto.
16. -. 2006. Anti-social anthropology? objectivity, objection and the ethnography of public policy and professional communities. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, n.s., 12(4):935-956.
17. National Security Strategy. 2008. The national security strategy of the United Kingdom: security in an interdependent world. Cm 7291. London. http://interactive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/.../security/ national-security
18. Roy, O. 2004. Globalized Islam: the search for a new ummah. New York: Columbia University Press.
19. Scheper-Hughes, N. 1995. The primacy of the ethical: propositions for a militant anthropology. Current Anthropology 36(3):409-420.
20. Schmitt, C. 1985 (1922). Political theology: four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. -. 1996 (1932). The idea of the political. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Sidel, J. 2006. Riots, pogroms, jihad: religious violence in Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23. Spencer, J. 2000. British social anthropology: a retrospective. Annual Review of Anthropology 29:1-24.
24. -. 2007. Anthropology, politics and the state: democracy and violence in South Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Tripp, C. 2007. Militias, vigilantes, death squads. London Review of Books 29(2):30-33.
26. Van der Veer, P. 2010. Comment on Werbner. Current Anthropology 51(2):215.
27. Walker, R. 2010. Violence, the everyday and the question of the ordinary. Contemporary South Asia 18(1):9-24.
28. Werbner, P. 2010. Notes from a small place: anthropological blues in the face of global terror. Current Anthropology 51(2):193-221.