Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: Where are we now? An appraisal of Wolpe, Foster and Langleben's "Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: Promise and perils" five years later

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 49-50

  Hyman, Steven E ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COGNITION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHICS; FORENSIC MEDICINE; GUILT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; NEUROSCIENCE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIVACY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES; DEVICES; PSYCHOLOGY; TRENDS;

AWARENESS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; COGNITION; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; GUILT; HUMANS; LIE DETECTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEUROSCIENCES; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIVACY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77958120265     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2010.527263     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Haxby, J. V., M. I. Gobbini, M. L. Furey, A. Ishai, J. L. Schouten, and P. Pietrini. 2001. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 293: 2425-2450.
2. Haynes, J.-D. and G. Rees. 2006. Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7: 523-534.
3. Kahnt, T., J. Heinzle, S. Q. Park, and J.-D. Haynes. 2010. The neural code of reward anticipation in human orbitofrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 107: 6010-6015.
4. National Research Council. 2003. The Polygraph and Lie Detection. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
5. Sip, K. E., A. Roepstorff, W. McGregor, and C. D. Frith. 2008. Detection deception: The scope and limits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 12: 48-53.
6. Wolpe, P. R., K. R. Foster, and D. D. Langleben. 2005. Emerging neurotechnologys for lie-detection: Promises and perils. American Journal of Bioethics 5: 39-49.