CT scan screening is associated with increased distress among subjects of the APExS

BMC Public Health

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Paris, Christophe ^a,b   Maurel, Marion ^c   Luc, Amandine ^b   Stoufflet, Audrey ^b   Pairon, Jean Claude ^d,e   Letourneux, Marc ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NANCY   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c EA 2304   (France)

^d INSERM U955   (France)

^e CENTRE HOSPITALIER INTERCOMMUNAL DE CRÉTEIL   (France)

^f CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASBESTOS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MENTAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PATIENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ASBESTOS; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PATIENTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77958119083     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-647     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Diagnosis and initial management of nonmalignant diseases related to asbestos. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004 170 6 691 715 10.1164/rccm.200310- 1436ST 15355871
2. Low-dose exposure to asbestos and lung cancer: dose-response relations and interaction with smoking in a population-based case-referent study in Stockholm, Sweden. P Gustavsson F Nyberg G Pershagen P Scheele R Jakobsson N Plato, Am J Epidemiol 2002 155 11 1016 1022 10.1093/aje/155.11.1016 12034580
3. Factors associated with early-stage pulmonary fibrosis as determined by high-resolution computed tomography among persons occupationally exposed to asbestos. C Paris J Benichou C Raffaelli A Genevois L Fournier G Menard N Broessel J Ameille P Brochard JC Gillon A Gislard M Letourneux, Scand J Work Environ Health 2004 30 3 206 214 15250649
4. Performance of chest radiograph and CT scan for lung cancer screening in asbestos-exposed workers. B Clin F Morlais L Guittet A Gislard M Marquignon C Paris J Caillard G Launoy M Letourneux, Occup Environ Med 2009 66 8 529 34 10.1136/oem.2008.041525 19273475
5. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer: review of screening principles and update on current status. WC Black, Cancer 2007 110 11 2370 2384 10.1002/cncr.23059 17941031
6. International expert meeting on new advances in the radiology and screening of asbestos-related diseases. A Tossavainen, Scand J Work Environ Health 2000 26 5 449 454 11103845
7. Asbestos Surveillance Program Aachen (ASPA): initial results from baseline screening for lung cancer in asbestos-exposed high-risk individuals using low-dose multidetector-row CT. M Das G Muhlenbruch AH Mahnken KG Hering H Sirbu W Zschiesche L Knoll MK Felten T Kraus RW Gunther JE Wildberger, Eur Radiol 2007 17 5 1193 1199 10.1007/s00330-006-0426-8 17047960
8. Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma in an asbestos-exposed population: baseline results of a prospective, nonrandomized feasibility trial - an Alpe-adria Thoracic Oncology Multidisciplinary Group Study (ATOM 002). G Fasola O Belvedere M Aita T Zanin A Follador P Cassetti S Meduri V De Pangher G Pignata V Rosolen F Barbone F Grossi, Oncologist 2007 12 10 1215 1224 10.1634/theoncologist.12-10-1215 17962615
9. Clinical practice. Lung cancer screening. JL Mulshine DC Sullivan, N Engl J Med 2005 352 26 2714 2720 10.1056/NEJMcp042630 15987920
10. Psychological issues related to the use of spiral CT for lung cancer early detection. RA Schnoll P Bradley SM Miller M Unger J Babb M Cornfeld, Lung Cancer 2003 39 3 315 325 10.1016/S0169-5002(02)00501-9 12609570
11. Anxiety, fear of cancer, and perceived risk of cancer following lung cancer screening. MM Byrne J Weissfeld MS Roberts, Med Decis Making 2008 28 6 917 925 10.1177/0272989X08322013 18725404
12. Impact of computed tomography screening for lung cancer on participants in a randomized controlled trial (NELSON trial). KA van den Bergh ML Essink-Bot EM Bunge ET Scholten M Prokop CA van Iersel RJ van Klaveren HJ de Koning, Cancer 2008 113 2 396 404 10.1002/cncr.23590 18484588
13. Psychological impact of computed tomography screening for lung cancer and occupational pulmonary disease among asbestos-exposed workers. T Vierikko S Kivisto R Jarvenpaa J Uitti P Oksa P Virtema T Vehmas, Eur J Cancer Prev 2009 18 3 203 206 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328329d800 19728402
14. Reactions of asbestos-exposed workers to notification and screening. BE Meyerowitz CD Sullivan CL Premeau, Am J Ind Med 1989 15 4 463 475 10.1002/ajim.4700150410 2729288
15. Asbestos and other toxins. P Lowinger, Am J Public Health 1990 80 10 1274 10.2105/AJPH.80.10.1274 2400048
16. Factors associated with cancer distress in the Asbestos Post-Exposure Survey (APEXS). M Maurel A Stoufflet L Thorel V Berna A Gislard M Letourneux JC Pairon C Paris, Am J Ind Med 2009 52 4 288 296 10.1002/ajim.20672 19152347
17. Pleural plaques and asbestosis: dose and time-response relationships based on HRCT data. C Paris S Thierry P Brochard M Letourneux E Schorle A Stoufflet J Ameille F Conso JC Pairon, Eur Respir J 2009 34 1 72 9 10.1183/09031936.00094008 19129281
18. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. H MacMahon JH Austin G Gamsu CJ Herold JR Jett DP Naidich EF Patz Jr SJ Swensen, Radiology 2005 237 2 395 400 10.1148/radiol.2372041887 16244247
19. Development and validation of the PCQ: a questionnaire to measure the psychological consequences of screening mammography. J Cockburn T De Luise S Hurley K Clover, Soc Sci Med 1992 34 10 1129 1134 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90286-Y 1641674
20. [Emotional, physical and social consequences of breast cancer: viability and utilization of a clinical questionnaire]. J Maziade L Thomassin R Morin, Can J Public Health 2001 92 1 57 61 11257994
21. Adverse psychologic consequences of positive cytologic cervical screening. C Lerman SM Miller R Scarborough P Hanjani S Nolte D Smith, Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991 165 3 658 662 1892194
22. The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review. J Brett C Bankhead B Henderson E Watson J Austoker, Psychooncology 2005 14 11 917 938 10.1002/pon.904 15786514
23. Does routine screening for breast cancer raise anxiety? Results from a three wave prospective study in England. S Sutton G Saidi G Bickler J Hunter, J Epidemiol Community Health 1995 49 4 413 418 10.1136/jech.49.4.413 7650466
24. Screening for breast cancer is associated with a low degree of psychological distress. O Ekeberg H Skjauff R Karesen, Breast 2001 10 1 20 24 10.1054/brst.2000.0177 14965553
25. Short-term impact of cancer prevention and screening activities on quality of life. J Cullen MD Schwartz WF Lawrence JV Selby JS Mandelblatt, J Clin Oncol 2004 22 5 943 952 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.191 14990651
26. Psychosocial aspects of lung cancer. K Carlsen AB Jensen E Jacobsen M Krasnik C Johansen, Lung Cancer 2005 47 3 293 300 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.08.002 15713512
27. The adequacy of measurement of short and long-term consequences of false-positive screening mammography. J Brodersen H Thorsen J Cockburn, J Med Screen 2004 11 1 39 44 10.1258/096914104772950745 15006113
28. Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. JM Green J Hewison HL Bekker LD Bryant HS Cuckle, Health Technol Assess 2004 8 33 1 109 iii, ix-x
29. Psychological distress in women at increased risk for breast cancer: the role of risk perception. S van Dooren AJ Rijnsburger C Seynaeve HJ Duivenvoorden ML Essink-Bot MM Tilanus-Linthorst HJ de Koning A Tibben, Eur J Cancer 2004 40 14 2056 2063 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.05.004 15341979
30. Factors associated with breast cancer-specific distress in younger women participating in a family history mammography screening programme. BJ Henderson S Tyndel K Brain A Clements C Bankhead J Austoker E Watson S Duffy G Evans H Fielder J Gray J Mackay D Macmillan, Psychooncology 2008 17 1 74 82 10.1002/pon.1201 17410528
31. High affective risk perception is associated with more lung cancer-specific distress in CT screening for lung cancer. EM Bunge KA van den Bergh ML Essink-Bot RJ van Klaveren HJ de Koning, Lung Cancer 2008 62 3 385 390 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.03.029 18468717
32. Perceived risk and interest in screening for lung cancer among current and former smokers. EJ Hahn MK Rayens C Hopenhayn WJ Christian, Res Nurs Health 2006 29 4 359 370 10.1002/nur.20132 16847914
33. The psychological effects of breast screening in terms of patients' perceived health anxieties. V Swanson IB McIntosh KG Power H Dobson, Br J Clin Pract 1996 50 3 129 135 8733330