Performance of chest radiograph and CT scan for lung cancer screening in asbestos-exposed workers

Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Volumn 66, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 529-534

  Clin, Bénédicte ^a   Morlais, F ^a   Guittet, L ^a   Gislard, A ^b   Marquignon, M F ^a   Paris, C ^c   Caillard, J F ^b   Launoy, G ^a   Letourneux, M ^a  

^a CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b ROUEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NANCY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASBESTOS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LUNG CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; TUMOR VOLUME; WORKER;

ASBESTOS; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMOKING; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 68149171778     PISSN: 13510711     EISSN: 14707926     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/oem.2008.041525     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Expertise Collective INSFRM. Effets sur la santé des principaux types d'expositions à l'amiante. [Health effects of the main types of asbestos exposure.] Paris: Les Editions INSERM, 1997. (Expertise collective.)
2. Hirsch FR, Franklin WA, Gazdar AF, et al. Early detection of lung cancer: clinical perspectives of recent advances in biology and radiology. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:5-22.
3. Henschke CI, Mac Cauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early lung cancer action project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet (Br Ed) 1999;354:99-105.
4. Henschke CI, Naidich DP, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early lung cancer action project: Initial findings on repeat screening. Cancer 2001;92:153-159 (Pubitemid 32623052)
5. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Libby D, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: the first ten years. Cancer J 2002;8(Suppl 1):S47-54.
6. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, MacCauley DI, et al. Guidelines for the use of spiral computed tomography in screening for lung cancer. Eur Respir J 2003;21(Suppl 39):S45-51.
7. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz D, Smith JP, et al. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer. JAMA 2007;298:513. (Pubitemid 47204946)
8. Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H, et al. Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology 1996;201:798-802. (Pubitemid 26392633)
9. Kaneko M, Kusumoto M, Kobayashi T, et al. Computed tomography screening for lung carcinoma in Japan. Cancer 2000;89(Suppl 11):2485-2488
10. Itoh S, Ikeda M, Isomura T, et al. Screening helical CT for mass screening of lung cancer: application of low-dose and single-breath-hold scanning. Radiat Med 1998;16:75-83. (Pubitemid 28259349)
11. Sone S, Takashima S, Li F, et al. Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner. Lancet (Br Ed) 1998;351:1242-1245 (Pubitemid 28181964)
12. Sone S, Nakayama T, Honda T, et al. CT findings of early-stage small cell lung cancer in a low-dose CT screening programme. Lung Cancer 2007;56:207-215 (Pubitemid 46613919)
13. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology 2005;235:259-265 (Pubitemid 40432263)
14. Diederich S, Thomas M, Semik M, et al. Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography: results of annual follow-up examinations in asymptomatic smokers. Eur Radiol 2004;14:691-702. (Pubitemid 38444585)
15. Pastorino U, Bellomi M, Landoni C, et al. Early lung-cancer detection with spiral CT and positron emission tomography in heavy smokers: 2-year results. Lancet 2003;23:593-597 (Pubitemid 37013298)
16. Stratégie de surveillance médicale clinique des personnes exposées à l'amiante. Texte du jury. Conclusions du jury de la conférence. Rev Mal Resp 1999;16:1356-1362
17. Schatzkin A, Connor RJ, Taylor PR, et al. Comparing new and old screening tests when a reference procedure cannot be performed on all screenees. Example of automated cytometry for early detection of cervical cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1987;4:672-678 (Pubitemid 17047140)
18. Cheng H, Macaluso M. Comparison of the accuracy of two tests with a confirmatory procedure limited to positive results. Epidemiology 1997;8:104-106 (Pubitemid 27014230)
19. Chock C, Irwing L, Berry G, et al. Comparing dichotomous screening tests when individuals negative on both tests are not verified. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:211-217 (Pubitemid 27501058)
20. Tossavainen A. International expert meeting on new advances in the radiology and screening of asbestos-related diseases. Consensus report. Scand J Work Environ Health 2000;26:449-454
21. Tiitola M, Kivisaari L, Huuskonen Matti S, et al. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer in asbestos-exposed workers. Lung Cancer 2002;35:17-22. (Pubitemid 34028086)
22. Vierriko T, Jarvenpaa R, Autti T, et al. Chest CT screening of asbestos-exposed workers: lung lesions and incidental findings. Eur Respir J 2007;29:78-84. (Pubitemid 46092001)
23. Das M, Mulhenbruch G, Mahnken AH, et al. Asbestos Surveillance Program Aachen (ASPA): initial results from baseline screening for lung cancer in asbestos-exposed high-risk individuals using low-dose multidetector-row CT. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1193-1199 (Pubitemid 46691948)
24. Fasola G, Belvedere O, Aita M, et al. Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma in an asbestos-exposed population: baseline results of a prospective, nonrandomized feasibility trial - an Alpa-adria Thoracic Oncology Multidisciplinary Group Study (ATOM 002). Oncologist 2007;12:1215-1224 (Pubitemid 350106352)
25. Day NE. Estimating the sensitivity of a screening test. J Epidemiol Community Health 1985;39:364-366
26. Cheng H, Macaluso M, Hardin JM. Validity and coverage of estimates of relative accuracy. Ann Epidemiol 2000;10:251-260 (Pubitemid 30330959)
27. Markowitz SB, Miller A, Miller J, et al. Ability of low-dose helical CT to distinguish between benign and malignant noncalcified lung nodules. Chest 2007;131:1028-1034 (Pubitemid 46608703)
28. Gohagan J, Marcus P, Fagerstrom R, et al. Baseline findings of a randomized feasibility trial of lung cancer screening with spiral CT scan vs chest radiograph: the Lung Screening Study of the National Cancer Institute. Chest 2004;126:114-121 (Pubitemid 38943126)
29. McWilliams A, Mayo J, MacDonald S, et al. Lung cancer screening: a different paradigm. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168:1167-1173 (Pubitemid 37421833)
30. Beigelman-Aubry C, Raffy P, Yang W, et al. Computer-aid detection of solid lung nodules on follow-up MDCT screening: evaluation of detection, tracking, and reading time. Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:948-955 (Pubitemid 47479781)
31. Campbell D, Abramson M, Manser R, et al. Review of the health status of power industry workers who participated in the SECL lung function program. Melbourne: Melbourne Health: Clinical Epidemiology and Health Service Unit, 2003:131.