Mapping genetic variation and seed zones for bromus carinatus in the blue mountains of eastern oregon, USA1

Botany

Volumn 88, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 725-736

  Johnson, R C ^a   Erickson, Vicky J ^b   Mandel, Nancy L ^c   Bradley St Clair, J ^c   Vance Borland, Kenneth W ^d  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^c PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^d The Conservation Planning Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Bromus carinatus; Genecology; Plant adaptation; Seed zones

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; GENEALOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; GERMPLASM; GRASS; GROWING SEASON; HABITAT RESTORATION; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SEED BANK; SUSTAINABILITY; TRANSFER ZONE; VEGETATION MAPPING;

BLUE MOUNTAINS [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

BROMUS; BROMUS CARINATUS;

EID: 77958109891     PISSN: 19162804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/B10-047     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ager, A.A., Heilman, P.E., and Stettler, R.F. 1993. Genetic variation in red alder (Alnus rubra) in relation to native climate and geography. Can. J. For. Res. 23(9): 1930-1939. doi:10.1139/x93-243.
2. Belsky, A.J., and Blumenthal, D.M. 1997. Effects of livestock grazing on stand dynamics and soils in upland forests of the interior west. Conserv. Biol. 11(2): 315-327. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739. 1997.95405.x.
3. Burdon, R.D. 1977. Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype-environment interaction in forest tree breeding. Silvae Genet. 26: 168-175.
4. Campbell, R.K. 1986. Mapped genetic variation of Douglas-fir to guide seed transfer in southwest Oregon. Silvae Genet. 35: 85-96.
5. Daly, C., Neilson, R.P., and Phillips, D.L. 1994. A statistical-topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. J. Appl. Meteorol. 33(2): 140-158. doi:10. 1175/1520-0450(1994)033<0140:ASTMFM>2.0.CO;2.
6. De Martonne, E. 1926. Aérisme et indice d'aridité. C.R. Acad. Sci. 182: 1395-1398.
7. Endler, J.A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
8. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). 2008. ArcInfo Workstation 8.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, Calif.
9. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). 2008. ArcGIS Desktop 9.3. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, Calif.
10. Erickson, V.J., Mandel, N.L., and Sorensen, F.C. 2004. Landscape patterns of phenotypic variation and population structuring in a selfing grass, Elymus glaucus (blue wildrye). Can. J. Bot. 82(12): 1776-1789. doi:10.1139/b04-141.
11. Harlan, J.R. 1945a. Cleistogamy and chasmogamy in Bromus carinatus Hook. & Arn. Am. J. Bot. 32(2): 66-72. doi:10.2307/ 2437112.
12. Harlan, J.R. 1945b. Natural breeding structure in the Bromus carinatus complex as determined by population analysis. Am. J. Bot. 32(3): 142-148. doi:10.2307/2437533.
13. Hassell, W.C., Carlson, J., and Doughty, J. 1983. Grasses for revegetation of mountain sites. In Managing intermountain rangelands - improvement of range and wildlife habitats. Compiled by S.B. Monsen and N. Shaw. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-157. Ogden, Utah.
14. Heslop-Harrison, J. 1964. Forty years of genecology. In Advances in ecological research. Vol. 2. Edited by J.B. Cragg. Academic Press, New York, N.Y. pp. 159-247.
15. Hessburg, P.F., Agee, J.K., and Franklin, J.F. 2005. Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modern eras. For. Ecol. Manage. 211(1-2): 117-139. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02. 016.
16. Hickman, J.C. 1993. The Jepson Manual: higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.
17. Hitchcock, C.L., Cronquist, A., and Ownbey, M. 1969. Vascular plants of the Pacific Northwest. Part 1: Vascular cryptograms, gymnosperms, and monocotyledons. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Wash.
18. Hufford, K.M., and Mazer, S.J. 2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18(3): 147-155. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00002-8.
19. Johnson, G.R., Sorensen, F.C., St. Clair, J.B., and Cronn, R.C. 2004. Pacific northwest forest tree seed zones: a template for native plants? Native Plants Journal, 5(2): 131-140. doi:10.2979/ NPJ.2004.5.2.131.
20. Kawecki, T.J., and Ebert, D. 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7(12): 1225-1241. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00684.x.
21. Keeley, J.E. 2006. Fire management impacts on invasive plants in the western United States. Conserv. Biol. 20(2): 375-384. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00339.x. PMID:16903098.
22. Kitzmiller, J.H. 2009. Regional genetic variation in three native grasses in northern California. Native Plants Journal, 10(3): 263-280. doi:10.2979/NPJ.2009.10.3.263.
23. Knapp, E.E., and Rice, K.J. 1996. Genetic structure and gene flow in Elymus glaucus (blue wildrye): implications for native grassland restoration. Restor. Ecol. 4(1): 1-10. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.1996.tb00101.x.
24. Law, A.G., and Schwendiman, J.L. 1946. Bromar mountain bromegrass. Bulletin No. 479. Washington State University, Pullman, Wash.
25. Mack, R.N. 1981. Invasion of Bromus tectorum L. into western North America: an ecological chronicle. Agro-ecosyst. 7(2): 145-165. doi:10.1016/0304-3746(81)90027-5.
26. McKay, J.K., and Latta, R.G. 2002. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QLT, and traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17(6): 285-291. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02478-3.
27. McKay, J.K., Christian, C.E., Harrison, S., and Rice, K.J. 2005. "How local is local?"- A review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restor. Ecol. 13(3): 432-440. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2005.00058.x.
28. Morgenstern, E.K. 1996. Geographic variation in forest trees. UBC Press, Vancouver, B.C.
29. Omernik, J.M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geogr. 77(1): 118-125. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00149.x.
30. Rehfeldt, G.E. 1986. Adaptive variation in Pinus ponderosa from intermountain regions I. Snake and Salmon River basins. For. Sci. 32: 79-92.
31. Rehfeldt, G.E. 1994. Adaptation of Picea engelmannii populations to the heterogeneous environments of the Intermountain West. Can. J. Bot. 72: 1197-1208. doi:10.1139/b94-146.
32. Rice, K.J., and Knapp, E.E. 2008. Effects of competition and life history stage on the expression of local adaptation in two native bunchgrasses. Restor. Ecol. 16(1): 12-23. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00257.x.
33. SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT user's guide. Version 8. Cary, N.C.
34. Sorensen, F.C. 1992. Genetic variation and seed transfer guidelines for lodgepole pine in central Oregon. USDA For. Serv. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Research Paper PNW-RP-453.
35. St Clair, J.B., Mandel, N.L., and Vance-Borland, K.W. 2005. Genecology of Douglas fir in western Oregon and Washington. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 96(7): 1199-1214. [Online.] doi:10.1093/aob/mci278.
36. USDA. 2006. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Plant Guide Mountain Brome. [Online]. Available from plants.usda.gov/ plantguide/doc/pg_brma4.doc.
37. Westerling, A.L., Hidalgo, H.G., Cayan, D.R., and Swetnam, T.W. 2006. Warming and earlier spring increases western U.S. forest wildfire. Science, 313(5789): 940-943. doi:10.1126/science.1128834.
38. Winthers, E., Fallon, D., Haglund, J., DeMeo, T., Nowacki, G., Tart, D., Ferwerda, M., Robertson, G., Gallegos, A., Rorick, A., Cleland, D.T., and Robbie, W. 2005. Terrestrial Ecological Unit Inventory technical guide. U.S. D.A. For. Serv. Washington Office, Ecosystem Management Coordination Staff, Washington, D.C.