Hierarchical multilinear models for multiway data

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 530-543

  Hoff, Peter D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Multiplicative model; PARAFAC; Regularization; Shrinkage

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; SHRINKAGE;

BAYESIAN; CATEGORICAL VARIABLES; HIERARCHICAL APPROACH; MODEL BASED APPROACH; MULTIPLICATIVE MODEL; PARAFAC; REDUCED-RANK METHODS; REGULARIZATION;

DATA HANDLING;

EID: 77958057679     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2010.05.020     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Boik, Robert J., 1986. Testing the rank of a matrix with applications to the analysis of interaction in ANOVA. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (ISSN: 0162-1459) 81 (393), 243-248.
2. Boik, Robert J., 1989. Reduced-rank models for interaction in unequally replicated two-way classifications. J. Multivariate Anal. (ISSN: 0047-259X) 28 (1), 69-87.
3. Coppi, R., Bolasco, S. (Eds.), 1989. Multiway Data Analysis. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, ISBN 0-444-87410-0. Papers from the International Meeting on the Analysis of Multiway Data Matrices held in Rome, March 28-30, 1988.
4. Efron, Bradley, Morris, Carl, 1973. Stein's estimation rule and its competitors-an empirical Bayes approach. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (ISSN: 0162-1459) 68, 117-130.
5. Gabriel, K.R., 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika (ISSN: 0006-3444) 58, 453-467.
6. Gabriel, K.R., 1998. Generalised bilinear regression. Biometrika (ISSN: 0006-3444) 85 (3), 689-700.
7. Harshman, R.A., 1970. Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: models and conditions for an "explanatory" multi-modal factor analysis. UCLA working papers in phonetics 16 (1) 84.
8. Harshman, R.A., Lundy, M.E., 1984. The PARAFAC model for three-way factor analysis and multidimensional scaling. Research Methods for Multimode Data Analysis 122-215.
9. Hoff, Peter, 2008. Modeling homophily and stochastic equivalence in symmetric relational data. In: Platt, J.C., Koller, D., Singer, Y., Roweis, S. (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 20. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 657-664.
10. James, W., Stein, Charles, 1961. Estimation with quadratic loss. In: Proc. 4th Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. and Prob, vol. I. Univ. California Press, Berkeley, Calif, pp. 361-379.
11. Kass, Robert E., Wasserman, Larry, 1995. A reference Bayesian test for nested hypotheses and its relationship to the Schwarz criterion. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (ISSN: 0162-1459) 90 (431), 928-934.
12. Kroonenberg, Pieter M., 2008. Applied Multiway Data Analysis. In: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Wiley-Interscience [John Wiley & Sons], Hoboken, NJ, ISBN 978-0-470-16497-6. With a foreword by Willem J. Heiser and Jarqueline Meulman.
13. Kruskal, Joseph B., 1976. More factors than subjects, tests and treatments: an indeterminacy theorem for canonical decomposition and individual differences scaling. Psychometrika (ISSN: 0033-3123) 41 (3), 281-293.
14. Kruskal, Joseph B., 1977. Three-way arrays: rank and uniqueness of trilinear decompositions, with application to arithmetic complexity and statistics. Linear Algebra Appl. 18 (2), 95-138.
15. Kruskal, J.B., 1989. Rank, decomposition, and uniqueness for 3-way andN-way arrays. In: Multiway Data Analysis (Rome, 1988). North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 7-18.
16. Pauler, Donna K., 1998. The Schwarz criterion and related methods for normal linear models. Biometrika (ISSN: 0006-3444) 85 (1), 13-27.doi:10.1093/ biomet/85.1.13. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/85.1.13.
17. Schwarz, Gideon, 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. (ISSN: 0090-5364) 6 (2), 461-464.
18. Spiegelhalter, David J., Best, Nicola G., Carlin, Bradley P., van der Linde, Angelika, 2002. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. (ISSN: 1369-7412) 64 (4), 583-639. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00353. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00353.
19. Tibshirani, Robert, 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (ISSN: 0035-9246) 58 (1), 267-288. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/2346178.
20. Tomasi, Giorgio, Bro, Rasmus, 2006. A comparison of algorithms for fitting the PARAFAC model. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. (ISSN: 0167-9473) 50 (7), 1700-1734.
21. Tsukuma, Hisayuki, 2008. Admissibility and minimaxity of Bayes estimators for a normal mean matrix. J. Multivariate Anal. (ISSN: 0047-259X) 99 (10), 2251-2264.
22. Tsukuma, Hisayuki, 2009. Generalized Bayes minimax estimation of the normal mean matrix with unknown covariance matrix. J. Multivariate Anal. 100 (10), 2296-2304.
23. Tukey, J.W., 1949. One degree of freedom for non-additivity. Biometrics 5 (3), 232-242.
24. Vega-Montoto, L., Gu, H., Wentzell, P.D., 2005. Mathematical improvements to maximum likelihood parallel factor analysis: theory and simulations. J. Chemom. 19 (4).
25. Vega-Montoto, L., Wentzell, P.D., 2003. Maximum likelihood parallel factor analysis (MLPARAFAC). J. Chemom. 17 (4), 237-253.
26. Ward, M.D., Siverson, R.M., Cao, X., 2007. Disputes, democracies, and dependencies: a reexamination of the Kantian peace. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 583-601.
27. Witten, D.M., Tibshirani, R., Hastie, T., 2009. A penalized matrix decomposition, with applications to sparse principal components and canonical correlation analysis. Biostatistics 10 (3), 515.