Maximum likelihood parallel factor analysis (MLPARAFAC)

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 237-253

  Vega Montoto, Lorenzo ^a   Wentzell, Peter D ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Error covariance; Maximum likelihood; Measurement errors; PARAFAC; Parallel factor analysis; Three way data; Trilinear data; Weighted PARAFAC

Indexed keywords

COVARIANCE MATRIX; FACTOR ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS;

ERROR COVARIANCES; MA XIMUM LIKELIHOODS; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; PARAFAC; PARALLEL FACTOR ANALYSIS; THREE WAY DATA; THREE-WAY ARRAYS; TRILINEAR DATA; WEIGHTED PARAFAC;

MEASUREMENT ERRORS;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CORRELATION FUNCTION; COVARIANCE; DECOMPOSITION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD PARALLEL FACTOR ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT; NOISE; SIMULATION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0038556902     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.789     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hirschfeld T. The hy-phen-ated methods. Anal. Chem. 1980; 52: 297A-312A.
2. Apellof CJ and Davison ER. Strategies for analyzing data from video fluorometric monitoring of liquid chromatographic effluents. Anal. Chem. 1981; 53: 2053-2056.
3. Leurgans S and Ross RT. Multilinear models: applications in spectroscopy. Statist. Sci. 1992; 7: 289-319.
4. Harshman RA. Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: model and conditions for an 'explanatory' multimode factor analysis. Work. Pap. Phonetics 1970; 16: 1-84.
5. Sanchez E and Kowalski BR. Tensorial resolution: a direct trilinear decomposition. J. Chemom. 1990; 4: 29-45.
6. Paatero P. A weighted non-negative least squares algorithm for three-way "PARAFAC" factor analysis, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997; 38: 223-242.
7. Yates F. The analysis of replicated experiments when the field results are incomplete. Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 1933; 1: 129-142.
8. Kiers HAL. Weighted least squares fitting using ordinary least squares algorithms. Psychometrika 1997; 62: 251-266.
9. Wentzell PD, Andrews DT, Hamilton DC, Faber K and Kowalski BR. Maximum likelihood principal component analysis. J. Chemom. 1997; 11: 339-366.
10. Bro R, Sidiropoulos ND and Smilde AK. Maximum likelihood fitting using simple least squares algorithms. J. Chemom. 2002; 16: 387-400.
11. Carroll JD and Chang J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of "Eckart-Young" decomposition. Psychometrika 1970; 35: 283-319.
12. Rao CR and Mitra S. Generalized Inverse of Matrices and its Applications. Wiley: New York, 1971.
13. Magnus JR and Neudecker H. Matrix Differential Calculus with Applications in Statistics and Econometrics. Wiley: Chichester, 1988.
14. Andersson CA and Bro R. Improving the speed of multiway algorithms. Part I: Tucker3. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998; 42: 93-103.
15. Bro R and Smilde AK. Centering and scaling in component analysis. J. Chemom. 2003; 17: 16-33.
16. Ross RT and Leurgans S. Component resolution using multilinear models. Methods Enzymol. 1995; 246: 679-700.
17. Wentzell PD and Lohnes MT. Maximum likelihood principal component analysis with correlated measurement errors: theoretical and practical considerations. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1999; 45: 65-85.
18. Bro R. Multi-way analysis in the food industry: models, algorithms and applications. PhD Thesis, Univerteit van Amsterdam, 1998.
19. Kruskal JB. Rank, decomposition, and uniqueness for 3-way and N-way arrays. In: Multiway Data Analysis, Coppi R, Bolasco S (eds). North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1989; 7.
20. Durell SR, Lee C, Ross RT and Gross EL. Factor analysis of the near-ultraviolet absorption spectrum of plastocyanyn using bilinear, trilinear and quadrilinear models. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1990; 278: 148-160.