Kennedy V Axis assessment in an Italian outpatient and inpatient population;L'applicazione dell'Asse V di Kennedy a un campione clinico italiano

Rivista di Psichiatria

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 214-220

  Mundo, Emanuela ^a   Bonalume, Laura ^b   Del Corno, Franco ^c   Madeddu, Fabio ^b   Lang, Margherita ^b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^c Associazione Per la Ricerca in Psicologia (ARP)   (Italy)

Author keywords

DSM; Dual diagnosis; Global functioning; K axis; V axis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH SERVICE; HOSPITAL CARE; HUMAN; ITALY; KENNEDY V AXIS ASSESSMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENTAL DISEASE; OUTPATIENT CARE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; ITALY; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENTS; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 77958055339     PISSN: 00356484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Goldman HH, Skodol AE, Lave TR. Revising Axis V for DSMIV: a review of measures of social functioning. Am J Psychiatry 1992; 149: 1148-56.
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Third Edition-Revised (DSM-III-R). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 1987.
3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Fourth Edition - Text Revised (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
4. Beitchman JH, Adlaf EM, Douglas L, Atkinson L, Young A, Johnson CJ, et al. Comorbidity of psychiatric and substance use disorders in late adolescence: a cluster analytic approach. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2001; 27: 421-40.
5. Startup M, Jackson MC, Bendix S. The concurrent validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Br J Clin Psychol 2002; 41: 417-22.
6. Haro JM, Kamath SA, Ochoa S, Novick D, Rele K, Fargas A, et al. The Clinical Global Impression - Schizophrenia Scale: a simple instrument to measure the diversity of symptoms present in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2003: 107: 16-23.
7. Spitzer RL, Gobbon M, Williams JB. Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale. In: Sedered LI, Dickey B (eds). Outcomes assessment in clinical practice. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1994.
8. Hilsenroth MJ, Ackerman SJ, Blagys MD, Baumann BD, Baity MR, Smith SR, et al. Reliability and validity of DSM-IV Axis V. Am J Psychiatry 2000; 157: 1858-63.
9. Hilsenroth MJ, Ackerman SJ, Blagys MD, Price JL. Dr. Hilsenroth and colleagues reply: letters to the editor. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158: 1936-7.
10. Hay P, Katsikitis M, Begg J, Da Costa J, Blumenfield N. A two year follow-up study and prospective evaluation of the DSM-IV Axis V. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54: 1028-30.
11. Jones SH, Thornicroft G, Coffey J, Dunn G. A brief mental health outcome scale: reliability and validity of the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Br J Psychiatry 1995; 166: 654-9.
12. Skodol AE, Link BG, Shrout PE, Horwath E. Toward construct validity for DSM-III axis V. Psychiatry Res 1988; 24: 13-23.
13. Skodol AE, Link BG, Shrout PE, Horwath E. The revision of Axis V in DSM-III-R: should symptoms have been included? Am J Psychiatry 1988; 145: 825-9.
14. Janca A. Reliability of DSM-IV Axis V Scales: letters to the editor. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158: 1935-6.
15. Jovanovíc AA, Gasíc MJ, Ivkovíc M, Milovanovíc S, Damjanovíc A. Reliability and validity of DSM-IV Axis V scales in a clinical sample of veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatr Danub 2008; 20: 286-300.
16. Kennedy JA, Foti ME. Axis V revisited. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54: 1413.
17. Stein MB, Hilsenroth M, Pinsker-Aspen JH, Primavera L. Validity of DSM-IV Axis V Global Assessment of Relational Functioning Scale: a multimethod assessment. J Nerv Ment Dis 2009; 197: 50-5.
18. Gigantesco A, Morosini P, Alunno Pergentini S, Minardi A, Cavagnaro P. Validazione di un nuovo strumento di valutazione multidimensionale degli anziani. G Gerontol 1995; 43: 379-85.
19. Fowler JC, Ackerman SJ, Speanburg, S, Bailey A, Blagys M, Conklin AC. Personality and symptom change in treatment-refractory inpatients: evaluation of the phase model of change using Rorschach, TAT, and DSM-IV Axis V. J Pers Assess 2004; 83: 306-22.
20. Dixon S. Book Review. Psychiatr Serv 2004; 55: 196-7.
21. Morosini PL, Magliano L, Brambilla L, Ugolini S, Pioli R. Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social functioning. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000; 101: 323-9.
22. Mezzich JE. Comprehensive diagnosis: a conceptual basis of future diagnostic systems. Psychopathology 2002; 35: 162-5.
23. Perry JC, Hoglend P, Shear K,Vaillant GE, Horowitz M, Kardos ME, et al. Field trial of a diagnostic axis for defence mechanisms for DSM-IV. J Personal Disord 1998; 12: 56-68.
24. Wing JK, Curtis RH, Beevor AS, Park BG, Hadden S, Burns A. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS): research and development. Br J Psychiatry 1998; 172: 11-8.
25. Lora A, Bai G, Bianchi S, Bolongaro G, Civenti G, Erlicher A, et al. The Italian version of HoNOS (Health of the Nation Outcome Scales), a scale for evaluating the outcome and the severity in mental health services. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2001; 3: 198-212.
26. Morosini P. La valutazione degli esiti nell'attività di routine dei servizi psichiatrici. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 1995; 4: 1-10.
27. nd ed. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists, Gaskell, 2000.
28. Ruggeri M. Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS). Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2001; 10: 194-212.
29. Slade M, Thornicroft G, Glover G. The feasibility of routine outcome measures in mental health. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999; 34: 243-9.
30. Fischer EP, Marder SR, Smith GR, Owen RR, Rubenstein L, Hedrick SC, et al. Quality enhancement research initiative in mental health. Med Care 2000; 38 (suppl 1): 70-81.
31. Thornicroft G, Slade M. Are routine outcome measures feasible in mental health? Qual Health Care 2000; 9: 84.
32. Callaly T, Hallebone EL. Introducing the routine use of outcomes measurement to mental health services. Aust Health Rev 2001; 24: 43-50.
33. Posternak MA, Zimmerman M, Solomon DA. Integrating outcomes research into clinical practice. Psychiatr Serv 2002; 53: 335-6.
34. Bebbington P, Brugha T, Hill T, Marsden L, Window S. Validation of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174: 389-94.
35. Amin S, Singh SP, Croudace T, Jones P, Medley I, Harrison G. Evaluating the health of the nation outcome scales. Reliability and validity in a three year follow up of first onset psychosis. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174: 400-3.
36. Brooks R. The reliability and validity of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: validation in relation to patient derived measures. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2000; 34: 504-11.
37. nd ed.). Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2003.
38. Kennedy JA. Il funzionamento del paziente psichiatrico: manuale di valutazione. Verso un nuovo Asse V del DSM. Trad. it. Raffaello Cortina Editore, 2007.
39. www.dsm5.org
40. Bonalume L, Crippa F, Giromini L. L'applicazione dell'Asse K a un campione di soggetti italiani. In: Kennedy JA. Il funzionamento del paziente psichiatrico: manuale di valutazione. Verso un nuovo Asse V del DSM. Trad. it. Raffaello Cortina Editore, 2007.
41. Bilezikian JM. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Chicago, IL: Illinois School of Professional Psychology, 1998.
42. Kennedy JA, Fisher W, Skog S. Kennedy Axis V in Long-Term-Care Patients (Pilot). Worcester State Hospital, University of Massachusetts Medical Centre, Worcester, MA, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, unpublished data, 1999.
43. Higgins J, Purvis K. A comparison of the Kennedy Axis V and the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. J Psychiatr Practice 2000; 6: 84-90.
44. th AEP Congress.
45. Palmieri G, Reitano F, Pingani L, Serri G, Rigatelli M. Effectiveness of inpatient treatment for reduction of self harm risk in affective and personality disorders, XXIV World Congress - IASP (International Association for Suicide Prevention), 2007.
46. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II disorders - Clinician version (SCID I). Trad. it. Mazzi F, Morosini P, De Girolamo G, Lussetti M, De Guaraldi GP (eds). Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali, 2003.
47. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders - Clinician version (SCID I). Trad. it. Mazzi F, Morosini P, De Girolamo G, Lussetti M, De Guaraldi GP (eds). Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali, 2000.
48. Cicchetti DV. The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submission: A cross-disciplinary investigation. Behav Brain Sci 1994; 14: 119-86.
49. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1981.