Comparison of updating techniques in transferability analysis of work trip mode choice models in developing countries

Journal of Advanced Transportation

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 89-102

  Santoso, Djoen San ^a   Tsunokawa, Koji ^b  

^a ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Thailand)

^b SAITAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Developing country; Ho Chi Minh City; Mode choice model; Phnom Penh; Transferability; Updating techniques

Indexed keywords

HO CHI MINH CITY; MODE CHOICE MODELS; PHNOM PENH; TRANSFERABILITY; UPDATING TECHNIQUES;

ESTIMATION; HOLMIUM;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES;

EID: 77958048861     PISSN: 01976729     EISSN: 20423195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/atr.112     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Atherton TJ, Ben-Akiva ME. Transferability and updating of disaggregate travel demand models. Transportation Research Record 1976; 610:12-18.
2. Talvitie A, Kirshner D. Specification, transferability and the effect of data outliers in modeling the choice of mode in urban travel. Transportation 1978; 7:311-331.
3. Galbraith RA, Hensher DA. Intra-metropolitan transferability of mode choice models. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 1982; 16-1:7-29.
4. Koppelman FS, Wilmot CG. Transferability analysis of disaggregate choice models. Transportation Research Record 1982; 895:18-24.
5. McCarthy PS. Further evidence on the temporal stability of disaggregate travel demand models. Transportation Research Part B 1982; 16-4:263-278.
6. Koppelman FS, Kuah GK, Wilmot CG. Transfer model updating with disaggregate data. Transportation Research Record 1985; 1037:102-107.
7. Gunn HF, Ben-Akiva ME, Bradley MA. Tests of the scaling approach to transferring disaggregate travel demand model. Transportation Research Record 1985; 1037:21-30.
8. Ben-Akiva M, Bolduc D. Approaches to model transferability and updating: the combined transfer estimator. Transportation Research Record 1987; 1139:1-7.
9. Badoe DA, Miller EJ. Analysis of the temporal transferability of disaggregate work trip mode choice mode. Transportation Research Record 1995; 1493:1-11.
10. Badoe DA, Miller EJ. Comparison of alternative methods for updating disaggregate logit mode choice models. Transportation Research Record 1995; 1493:90-100.
11. Karasmaa N. The spatial transferability of the Helsinki metropolitan area mode choice models. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Transport Research, Seoul, 2001.
12. Santoso DS, Tsunokawa K. Spatial transferability and updating of mode choice models in developing countries. Transportation Planning and Technology 2005; 28-5:341-358.
13. Ben-Akiva M. Issues in transferring and updating travel-behavior models. In Stopther PR, Meyburg AH, Brog WDC (eds). New Horizons in Travel-Behaviour Research. Heath and Co.: Lexington, Massachusetts, 1981.
14. Koppelman FS, Wilmot CG. The effect of omission of variables on choice model transferability. Transportation Research Part B 1986; 20-3:205-213.
15. McFadden D. Properties of the Multinomial Model.Working Paper 7617. Urban Travel Demand Forecasting Project, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 1976.
16. Westin R, Manski CF. Theoretical and conceptual developments in demand modelling. In Hensher DA, Stopher PR (eds). Behavioral Travel Modelling. Croom-Helm: London, 1979.
17. Santoso DS, Tsunokawa K. Transferability and updating analysis of mode choice models between two developing countries - predictive performance point of view. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 2005; 6:173-185.