Adherence to a breast cancer screening program and its predictors in underserved women in southern Brazil

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 2673-2679

  Caleffi, Maira ^a   Ribeiro, Rodrigo A ^a,b   Bedin Jr , Ademar J ^a   Viegas Butzke, Júlia M P ^a   Baldisserotto, Fernanda D G ^a   Skonieski, Giovana P ^a   Giacomazzi, Juliana ^b,c   Camey, Suzi A ^b   Ashton Prolla, Patrícia ^b,c  

^a Associação Hospitalar Moinhos de Vento   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^c HOSPITAL DE CLÍNICAS DE PORTO ALEGRE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BRAZIL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77958045966     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0338     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74-108.
2. Instituto Nacional de Câncer; Ministério da Saúde. Controle do câncer de mama: documento de consenso. Rev Bras Cancerol 2004;50:77-90.
3. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, von Eschenbach AC, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:8-22. (Pubitemid 34110468)
4. Schootman M, Jeffe DB, Baker EA, Walker MS. Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:202-7.
5. Meissner HI, Breen N, Taubman ML, Vernon SW, Graubard BI. Which women aren't getting mammograms and why? (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2007;18:61-70.
6. Schumacher MC, Slattery ML, Lanier AP, et al. Prevalence and predictors of cancer screening among American Indian and Alaska native people: the EARTH study. Cancer Causes Control 2008;19:725-37.
7. Maheswaran R, Pearson T, Jordan H, Black D. Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:208-12.
8. Carney PA, Harwood BG, Weiss JE, Eliassen MS, Goodrich ME. Factors associated with interval adherence to mammography screening in a population-based sample of New Hampshire women. Cancer 2002;95:219-27.
9. Phillips KA, Kerlikowske K, Baker LC, Chang SW, Brown ML. Factors associated with women's adherence to mammography screening guidelines. Health Serv Res 1998;33:29-53.
10. Rahman SM, Dignan MB, Shelton BJ. Factors influencing adherence to guidelines for screening mammography among women aged 40 years and older. Ethn Dis 2003;13:477-84.
11. Cohen SS, Signorello LB, Gammon MD, Blot WJ. Obesity and recent mammography use among black and white women in the Southern Community Cohort Study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2007;18:765-73.
12. Graves KD, Huerta E, Cullen J, et al. Perceived risk of breast cancer among Latinas attending community clinics: risk comprehension and relationship with mammography adherence. Cancer Causes Control 2008;19:1373-82.
13. Caleffi M, Ribeiro RA, Duarte Filho DL, et al. A model to optimize public health care and downstage breast cancer in limited-resource populations in southern Brazil. (Porto Alegre Breast Health Intervention Cohort). BMC Public Health 2009;9:83.
14. Ashton-Prolla P, Giacomazzi J, Schmidt AV, et al. Development and validation of a simple questionnaire for the identification of hereditary breast cancer in primary care. BMC Cancer 2009;9:283.
15. Palmero EI, Caleffi M, Schuler-Faccini L, et al. Population prevalence of hereditary breast cancer phenotypes and implementation of a genetic cancer risk assessment program in Southern Brazil. Genet Mol Biol 2009;32:447-455.
16. Claus EB, Risch N, Thompson WD. Autosomal dominant inheritance of early-onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction. Cancer 1994;73:643-51.
17. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:1879-86.
18. Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J. A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med 2004;23:1111-30. (Pubitemid 38477070)
19. Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L, et al. Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial. BMJ 1988;297:943-8.
20. Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Warwick J, et al. The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial. Cancer 2003;97:2387-96.
21. Selvin E, Brett KM. Breast and cervical cancer screening: sociodemographic predictors among White, Black, and Hispanic women. Am J Public Health 2003;93:618-23.
22. Achat H, Close G, Taylor R. Who has regular mammograms? Effects of knowledge, beliefs, socioeconomic status, and health-related factors. Prev Med 2005;41:312-20.
23. Calvocoressi L, Kasl SV, Lee CH, Stolar M, Claus EB, Jones BA. A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and White women ages 40 to 79 years. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:2096-105. (Pubitemid 40054304)
24. Hiatt RA, Pasick RJ, Stewart S, et al. Cancer screening for underserved women: the Breast and Cervical Cancer Intervention Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:1945-9.
25. Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:21.
26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, NIH. Healthy People 2010: Cancer; (10/01/2009): Available from: http://www.healthypeople.gov/ document/html/volume1/03cancer.htm.
27. Ricker C, Lagos V, Feldman N, et al. If we build it ... will they come?- establishing a cancer genetics services clinic for an underserved predominantly Latina cohort. J Genet Couns 2006;15:505-14.
28. Farmer D, Reddick B, D'Agostino R, Jackson SA. Psychosocial correlates of mammography screening in older African American women. Oncol Nurs Forum 2007;34:117-23.
29. Russell KM, Perkins SM, Zollinger TW, Champion VL. Sociocultural context of mammography screening use. Oncol Nurs Forum 2006; 33:105-12.
30. Tatla RK, Paszat LF, Bondy SJ, Chen Z, Chiarelli AM, Mai V. Socioeconomic status and returning for a second screen in the Ontario breast screening program. Breast 2003;12:237-46.
31. Bancej CM, Maxwell CJ, Onysko J, Eliasziw M. Mammography utilization in Canadian women aged 50 to 69: identification of factors that predict initiation and adherence. Cancer J Public Health 2005; 96:364-8.
32. Katapodi MC, Lee KA, Facione NC, Dodd MJ. Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med 2004;38:388-402.