Unexpected changes in the bird assemblage in areas under selective logging in piedmont forest in northwestern Argentina;Cambios inesperados en el ensamble de aves en áreas bajo explotación forestal en la selva pedemontana del noroeste Argentino

Ornitologia Neotropical

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 323-337

  Miranda, Maria Verónica ^a   Politi, Natalia ^a   Rivera, Luis O ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE JUJUY   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Mist nets; Northwestern argentina; Piedmont forest; Understory birds; Yungas

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958044922     PISSN: 10754377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Aleixo, A. 1999. Effects of selective logging on a bird community in the Brazilian Atlantic forest Condor 101: 537-548.
2. Anderson, B. W., R. D. Ohmart, & J. Rice. 1983. Avian and vegetation community structure and their seasonal relationships in the lower Colorado river Valley. Condor 85: 392-415.
3. Baev, P. V., & L. D. Penev. 1995. BIODIV: program for calculating biological diversity parameters, similarity, niche overlap, and cluster analisis. Versión 5.1. Pensoft, Sofia, Bulgaria.
4. Barlow, J., C. A. Peres, L. M. P. Henriques, P. C. Stouffer, & J. M. Wunderle. 2006. The responses of understorey birds to forest fragmentation, logging and wildfires: an Amazonian synthesis. BioL Conserv. 128: 182-192. (Pubitemid 41831424)
5. Berg, A., B. Ehnstrom, L. Gustafsson, T. Hallingback, M. Jonsell. & J. Weslien. 1994. Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forests: distribution and habitat associations. Conserv. Biol. 8: 718-731.
6. Bersier, L. F., & D. R. Meyer. 1994. Bird assemblages in mosaic forests • the relative importance of vegetation structure and floristic composition along the successionsl gradient Acta Oecol. Int J. Ecol. 15: 561-576.
7. Bibby, C. J., N. D. Burgess, & D. A. Hill. 1992. Bird census techniques. Academic Press, London, UK.
8. Bicknell, J., & C. A. Peres. 2010. Vertebrate population responses to reduced-impact logging in a neotropical forest For. Ecol. Manage. 259: 2267-2275.
9. Blake, J. G., & B. A. Loiselle. 2001. Bird assemblages in second-growth and old-growth forests, Costa Rica: perspectives from mist nets and point counts. Auk 118: 304-326.
10. Blake, J. G., & M. Rougès. 1997. Variation in capture rates of understory birds in El Rey National Park, northwestern Argentina. OrnitoL Neotrop. 8: 185-193.
11. Blendinger, P. G., & M. E. Álvarez. 2009. Aves de la Selva Pedemontana de las Yungas Australes. Pp. 233-272 en Brown, A. D., P. G. Blendinger, T. Lomascolo, & P. Garcia Bes (eds.). Ecología, historia natural y conservación de la Selva Pedemontan de las Yungas Australes. Ediciones del Subtropico, Tucumán, Argentina.
12. Bojorge-Baños, J. C., & L. López-Mata. 2006. Asodadón de la riqueza y diversidad de espedes de aves y estructura de la vegetadón en la selva mediana subperennifolia en el centro de Veracruz, Méxica Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 77: 235-249.
13. Brown, A. D., P. G. Blendinger, T. Lomáscolo, & P. Garda Bes (eds.). 2009. Selva Pedemontana de las Yungas. Historia natural, ecología y manejo de un ecosistema en peligra Edidones del Subtrópico, Tucumán, Argentina.
14. Brown, A. D., H. R. Grau, L. Malizia, & A. Grau. 2001. Argentina. Pp. 623-659 en Kappelle, M., & A. D Brown (eds.). Bosques nublados del neotrópica InBio, Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa Rica.
15. Brown, A. D, O. U. Martínez, M. Acerbi, & J. Corcuera (eds.). 2005. La Situadón Ambiental Argentina 2005. Fundadón Vida Silvestre Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
16. Cabrera, A. 1976. Regiones fitogeográficas Argentinas. Enddopedia Argentina de Agricultura y Jardinería 1: 1-81.
17. Carnicer, J., P. Jordano, & C. J. Mellán. 2009. The temporal dynamics of resource use by frugivorous birds: a network approach. Ecology 90: 1958-1970.
18. Chalukiin, S. C., S. de Bustos, M. Saravia, L. R. Lizarraga, R. Serapio, M. S. Sola, & R. Romana 2002. Caractedzadón de áreas protegidas en el corredor transversal Sur Salta, Argentina. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable de la provincia de Salta (SeMADeS) y Wildlife Conservation Sodety (WCS), Salta, Argentina.
19. Cintra, R., A. E. Maruoka, & L. N. Naka. 2006. Abundance of two Dendrocincla woodcreepers (Aves: Dendrocolaptidae) in relation to forest structure in central Amazonia. Acta Amazonica 36: 209-220.
20. Clay, D 1988. BIO-DAP. Ecological diversity and its measurement Resource Conservation, Fundy National Park, Alma New Brunswick, Canada.
21. Connell, J. H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302-1310.
22. Colwell, R. K. 2000. EstimateS. Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 6. Publicado en http:// viceroy.eeb.uconn.eduEstimateS.
23. Cueto, V., & J. Lopez de Casenave. 2000. Bird assemblages of protected and exploited coastal woodlands in east-central Argentina. Wilson Bull. 112: 395-402. (Pubitemid 30648062)
24. Derlindati, E. J., & S. M. Caziani. 2005. Mist nets and point counts in understory and canopy: analyzing bird assemblages in Chaco forests. Wilson Bull. 117: 92-99.
25. Díaz, I. A., J. J. Armesto, S. Reid, K. E. Sieving, & M. F. Willson. 2005. Linking forest structure and composition: avian diversity in successions forests of Chiloé Island, Chile. Biol. Conserv. 123: 91-101.
26. Didham, R. K., & J. H. Lawton. 1999. Edge structure determines the magnitude of changes in microclimate and vegetation structure in tropical forest fragments. Biotropica 31: 17-30.
27. Dudley, N., M. Hockings, S. Stolton, & M. Kiernan. 1999. Effectiveness of forest protected areas. A paper for the IFF intercessional meeting on protected areas, Puerto Rico. Descarga el 10 de Didembre de 2009 de http://www.nrsm.uq.edu.au/wcpa/metf/ pages/mech-protecthtm.
28. Flores, B., D. I. Rumiz, & G. Cox. 2001. Avifauna del bosque semideciduo Chiquitano (Santa Cruz, Bolivia) antes y después de aprove-chamiento forestal selectivo. Ararajuba 9: 21-31.
29. Flores, B., D. I. Rumiz, T. S. Fredericksen, & N. J. Fredericksen. 2002. El uso de claros de aprove-chamiento forestal por la avifauna de un bosque semideciduo Chiquitano de Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Hornero 17: 61-69.
30. Flores, B., D. I. Rumiz, & G Blate. 2005. Estructura de la vegetadón y de la comunidad de aves en un bosque intervenido de La Chonta, Guarayos, Santa Cruz. Rev. Bol. Ecol. 18: 33-50.
31. Flores, B., & A. Martínez. 2007. Monitoreo de aves de sotobosque en bisques con diferentes intensidades de aprovechamiento forestal. Proyecto BOLFOR. Instituto Boliviano de Investigadón Forestal, Santa Cruz, Bolivia.
32. Gardali, T., G. Ballard, N. Nur, & G. R. Geupel. 2000. Demography of a declining population of Warbling Vireos in coastal California. Condor 102: 601-609. (Pubitemid 30647487)
33. Guilherme, E., & R. Cintra. 2001. Effects of intensity and age of selective logging and tree girdling on an understory bird community composition in central Amazonia, Brazil. Ecotropica 7: 77-92.
34. Herrera, C. M. 1978. Ecological correlates of residence and non-residence in a Mediterranean passerine bird community. J. Anim. Ecol. 47: 871-890.
35. Johns, A. D. 1991. Responses of Amazonian rain forest birds to habitat modification. J. Trop. Ecol. 7: 417-437.
36. Karr, J. R. 1976. Within- and between-habitat avian diversity in African and Neotropical lowland habitats. Ecol. Monogr. 46: 457-481.
37. Karr, J. R. 1981. Surveying birds with mist nets. Stud. Avian Biol. 6: 62-67.
38. st century: the science of ecosystem management Island Press, Washington, DC.
39. Lindenmayer, D., & J. F. Franklin. 2002. Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach. Island Press, Washington, DC.
40. McKinney, M. L., & J. L. Lockwood. 1999. Biotic homogenization: A few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends EcoL EvoL 14: 450-453
41. MacArthur, R., & J. W. MacArthur. 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42: 594-598.
42. Magurran, A. E. 1989. Diversidad ecológica y su medidón. Edidones Vedra, Barcelona, España.
43. Magurran, A. E. 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
44. Malizia, L. R., P. G. Blendinger, M. E. Alvarez, L. Rivera, N. Politi, & G. Nicolossi. 2005. Bird communities in Andean Premontane forests of northwestern Argentina. OrnitoL Neotrop. 16: 231-251.
45. Marsden, S. J. 1998. Changes in bird abundance following selective logging in Seran, Indonesia. Conserv. Biol. 12: 605-611.
46. Mason, D. 1996. Responses of Venezuelan understory birds to selective logging, enrichment estips and, vine cutting. Biotropica 28: 296-309.
47. Mason, D. J., &J. M., Thiollay. 2001. Tropical forest and the conservation of Neotropical birds. Pp. 167-191 en Fimbel R. A., A. Grajal, & J. G. Robinson (eds.). The cutting edge: conserving wildlife in logged tropical forest Columbia Univ. Press, New York, New York.
48. Montaldo, N. H. 2005. Aves frugívoras de un relicto de selva subtropical ribereña en Argentina: manipuladón de frutos y destino de la semilla. Hornero 20: 163-172.
49. Moreira, F., A. Delgado, S. Ferreira, R. Borralho, N. Oliveira, M. Inácio, J. S. Silva, & F. Rego. 2003. Effects of prescribed fire on vegetation structure and breeding birds in young Pinus pinaster stands of northern Portugal, For. Ecol. Manage. 184: 225-237.
50. Mostacedo, B., T. Fredericksen, & M. Toledo. 1998. Respuestas de las plantas a la intensidad de aprovechamiento en un bosque semideciduo pluvioestadonal de la región de Lomerío, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Rev. Soc Bot. 2: 75-88.
51. Mueller-Dombois, D., & H., Ellemberg. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York.
52. Newmark, W. 2005. A 16-year study of forest disturbance and understory bird community structure and composition in Tanzania. Conserv. Biol. 20: 122-134.
53. Pacheco, S., & A. D. Brown. 2006. La biodhrersidad de las ecorregiones de las Yungas ¿es sustentaba a largo plazo? Pp. 59-61 en Brown, A. D., O. U. Martine, M. Acerbi, & J. Corcuera (eds.). La situación ambiental Argentina 2005. Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
54. Pearman, P. B., 2002. The scale of community structure: habitat variation and avian guilds in tropical forest understorey. EcoL Monogr. 72: 19-39.
55. Pearson, D. L. 1977. Ecological relationships of small antbirds in Amazonian bird communities. Auk 94: 283-292.
56. Pinazo, M. A., & N. I. Gasparri 2003. Cambios estructurales causados por el aprovechamiento selectivo en el Bosque Montano del norte de Salta, Argentina. Ecol. Austral 13: 160-172.
57. Pohlman, C. L, S. M. Turton, & M. Goosem. 2007. Edge effects of linear canopy openings on tropical rain forest understory microclimate. Biotropica 29: 62-71.
58. Politi, N., M. Hunter, Jr., & L. Rivera. 2009. Nest selection by cavity-nesting birds in subtropical montane forests of the Andes: some implications for sustainable forest management Biotropica 41: 354-360.
59. Ralph, C. J., G. R. Geupel, P. Pyle, T. E. Martin, D. F. DeSante, & B. Milá 1996. Manual de métodos de campo para el monitoreo de aves terrestres. General Technical Report PSW-GTR159, USDA Forest Service, Albany, California.
60. Rappole, J. H., K Winker, & G. V. N. Powell. 1998. Migratory bird habitat use in southern Mexico: mist nets versus point counts. J. Field Ornithol. 69: 635-643.
61. Remsen, J. V., & D. A. Good. 1996. Misuse of data from mist-net captures to assess relative abundance in bird populations. Auk 113: 381-398.
62. Restrepo, C., & N. Gómez. 1998. Responses of understory birds to anthropogenic edges in a Neotropical montane forest EcoL AppL 8: 170-183.
63. Rosenberg, G. H. 1990. Habitat specialization and foraging behavior by birds of Amazonian river islands in northeastern Peru. Condor 92: 427-443.
64. Saunders, D. A., R. J. Hobbs, & C. R. Margules. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv. BioL 5: 18-32.
65. Schewske, D. W., & N. Brokaw. 1981. Treefalls and the distribution of understory birds in a tropical forest Ecology 62: 938-945.
66. Sedgeley, J. A., & C. F. O'Donnell. 1999. Factors influencing the selection of roost cavities by a temperate rainforest bat (Vespertilionidae: Cbalinolobus tuberculatus) in New Zealand. J. Zool. 249: 437-446.
67. Smith, A. L., J. S. Ortiz, & R. J. Robertson. 2001. Distribution patterns of migrant and resident birds in successions forest of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico. Biotropica 33: 153-170.
68. Stotz, D. F., J. W. Fitzpatrick, T. E. Park, III, & D K. Moskovits. 1996. Neotropical birds: ecology and conservation. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
69. Sutherland, W. J. 1996. Ecological census techniques: a handbook. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
70. Thiollay, J. M. 1992. Influence of selective logging on bird species diversity in a Guianan rain forest Biodivers. Conserv. 6: 47-63.
71. Van Home, B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J. Wildl. Manage. 47: 893-901.
72. Vanhof, M. J., & R. M. R. Barclay. 1996. Roost-site selection and roosting ecology of forest-dwelling bats in southern British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 74: 1797-1805.
73. Verea, C., & A. Solórzana 1998. La avifauna del sotobosque de una Selva Deddua tropical en Venezuela. OrnitoL Neotrop. 9: 161-176.
74. Wang, Y., & D. M. Finch. 2002. Consistency of mist netting and point counts in assessing landbird spedes richness and relative abundance during migrations. Condor 104: 59-72. (Pubitemid 34186276)
75. Whitman, A. A., J. M. Hagan, & N. V. L. Brokaw. 1998. Effects of selection logging on birds in Northern Belize. Biotropica 30: 449-457.
76. Willson, M. F. 1974. Avian community organization and habitat structure. Ecology 55: 1017-1029.
77. Wunderle, J. M., Jr., M. R. Willig, & L. M. P. Henriques. 2005. Avian distribution in treefall gaps and understory of terra firmeforest in the lowland Amazon. Ibis 147: 109-129.
78. Wunderle, J. M., Jr., L M. P. Henriques, & M. R. Willing. 2006. Short-term responses of birds to forest gaps and understory: an assessment of reduced-impact logging in a lowland Amazon forest Biotropica 38: 235-255.
79. Zurita, G. A., & G. A. Zuleta. 2008. Bird use of logging gaps in a subtropical mountain forest the influence of habitat structure and resouce abundante in the Yungas of Argentine. For. Ecol. Manage. 257: 271-279.