Maximizing the general success of cecal intubation during propofol sedation in a multi-endoscopist academic centre

BMC Gastroenterology

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Cardin, Fabrizio ^a   Minicuci, Nadia ^b   Andreotti, Alessandra ^b   Pinetti, Elena ^c   Campigotto, Federico ^b   Donà, Barbara M ^d   Martella, Bruno ^a   Terranova, Oreste ^a  

^a GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b CNR   (Italy)

^c Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit   (Italy)

^d VENETO INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY IOV IRCCS   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN; PROPOFOL; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; CECUM INTUBATION; COLON LAVAGE; COLONOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP SEDATION; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INTESTINE ENDOSCOPY; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; OXYGENATION; PROBABILITY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; TEACHING HOSPITAL; WORK EXPERIENCE; WORKLOAD; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; FOLLOW UP; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PROPOFOL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957990885     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1471230X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-123     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Rex DK. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:2866-77. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00905.x, 17227527.
2. Inadomi JM. In search of quality colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2008, 135:1845-62. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.11.003, 19000685.
3. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, Levin TR, Burt RW, Johnson DA, Kirk LM, Litlin S, Lieberman DA, Waye JD, Church J, Marshall JB, Riddell RH, . U.S Multy-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97(6):1296-308. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05812.x, 12094842, U.S Multy-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer..
4. Kozarek RA, Botoman VA, Patterson DJ. Prospective evaluation of a small caliber endoscope for colonoscopy after unsuccessful examination. Gastointest Endosc 1989, 35:333-5.
5. Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG, Williams CB. A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomized controlled trial. Gut 2000, 46:801-5. 10.1136/gut.46.6.801, 1756452, 10807891.
6. Sanaka MR, Shah N, Mullen KD, Ferguson DR, Thomas C, McCullough AJ. Afternoon colonoscopies have higher failure rates than morning colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:2726-30. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00887.x, 17227519.
7. Wexner SD, Garbus JE, Singh JJ, . The SAGES Colonoscopy Outcomes Study Group. A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Surg Endosc 2001, 15:251-61. 10.1007/s004640080147, 11344424, The SAGES Colonoscopy Outcomes Study Group..
8. Church JM. Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not?. Am J Gastroenterol 1994, 89(4):556-60.
9. Rex DK, Imperiale TF, Portish V. Patients willing to try colonoscopy without sedation: associated clinical factors and results of a randomized controlled trial. Gastointest Endosc 1999, 49(5):554-9.
10. Harris JK, Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Burnand B, Gonvers JJ, Vader J-P. Factors associated with the technical performance of a colonoscopy: An EPAGE Study. Dig Liver Dis 2007, 39:678-89. 10.1016/j.dld.2007.02.012, 17434349.
11. Ball JE, Osbourne J, Jowett S, Pellen M, Welfare MR. Quality improvement programme to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: prospective before and after study. BMJ 2004, 329:665-7. 10.1136/bmj.329.7467.665, 517648, 15374917.
12. Kondo S, Yamaji Y, Watabe H, Yamada A, Sugimoto T, Ohta M, Ogura K, Okamoto M, Yoshida H, Kawabe T, Omata M. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope. Am J Gastroenterol 2007, 102:75-81. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00897.x, 17100978.
13. Vargo JJ. Propofol-mediated gastrointestinal endoscopy. Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2004, 6(2):60-4.
14. Rex DK. Colonoscopy turning the focus on quality. Dig Liver Dis 2002, 34:831-2. 10.1016/S1590-8658(02)80251-1, 12643289.
15. ASA New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963, 24:111. ASA.
16. Ee HC, Semmens JB, Hoffman NE, . Perth Teaching Hospitals Endoscopy Group Complete colonoscopy rarely misses cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 55(2):167-71. 10.1067/mge.2002.121190, 11818917, Perth Teaching Hospitals Endoscopy Group.
17. Anderson ML, Pasha TM, Leighton JA. Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study. Am J Gastroenterol 2000, 95(12):3418-22. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03356.x, 11151871.
18. Radaelli F, Meucci G, Minoli G, . the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists (AIGO) Colonoscopy practice in Italy: a prospective survey on behalf of the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists. Dig Liver Dis 2008, 40:897-904. 10.1016/j.dld.2008.02.021, 18395500, the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists (AIGO).
19. Spinzi G, Dal Fante M, Masci E, Buffoli F, Colombo E, Fiori G, Ravelli P, Ceretti E, Minoli G, . SIED Lombardia Working Group Lack of colonic neoplastic lesions in patients under 50 yr of age with hematochezia: a multicenter prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 2007, 102:2011-15. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01332.x, 17521401, SIED Lombardia Working Group.
20. Cremers MI, Marques-Vidal P. Colonoscopies in Portuguese District Hospitals: a multicentric transverse study. Dig Liver Dis 2006, 38:912-7. 10.1016/j.dld.2006.04.011, 16777501.
21. Garvican L. Planning for a possible national colorectal cancer screening programme. J Med Screen 1998, 5:187-95.
22. Twombly R. Recommendations raise workload issues for colon cancer screening. JNCI 2004, 96:348-50.
23. Waye JD. Completing colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2000, 95(10):2681-2. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03172.x, 11051334.
24. Anderson JC, Gonzalez JD, Messina CR, Pollack BJ. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol 2000, 95:2784-7. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03186.x, 11051348.
25. Kim WH, Cho YJ, Park JY, Min PK, Kang JK, Park IS. Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 52(5):600-5. 10.1067/mge.2000.109802, 11060182.
26. Bowles CJA, Leicester R, Romaya C, Swarbrick E, Williams CB, Epstein O. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?. Gut 2004, 53:277-83. 10.1136/gut.2003.016436, 1774946, 14724164.
27. Hoda S. Cancer detection rates higher with deep sedation during colonoscopy. Digestive Disease Week 2009, Abstract 722.