|
|
Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 348-350
|
|
Recommendations raise workload issues for colon cancer screening
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
BARIUM ENEMA;
CANADA;
CANCER SCREENING;
COLON CANCER;
COLONOSCOPY;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE;
HEALTH CARE MANPOWER;
HEALTH CARE PLANNING;
HEALTH CARE SYSTEM;
HIGH RISK POPULATION;
HUMAN;
NOTE;
OCCULT BLOOD;
PATIENT REFERRAL;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SIGMOIDOSCOPY;
STAFF TRAINING;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UNITED STATES;
WORKLOAD;
ARTICLE;
COLORECTAL TUMOR;
EDUCATION;
GASTROENTEROLOGY;
MASS SCREENING;
MEDICAL EDUCATION;
METHODOLOGY;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
CANADA;
COLONOSCOPY;
COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS;
EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING;
GASTROENTEROLOGY;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
MASS SCREENING;
OCCULT BLOOD;
SIGMOIDOSCOPY;
UNITED STATES;
WORKLOAD;
|
|
EID: 1542288156
PISSN: 00278874
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/96.5.348-a Document Type: Note |
|
Times cited : (6)
|
|
References (0)
|