Open innovation and patterns of R&D competition

International Journal of Technology Management

Volumn 52, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 295-321

  Lim, Kwanghui ^a   Chesbrough, Henry ^b   Ruan, Yi ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

AMD; Co opetition; IBM; Intel; Open innovation; Patents; Semiconductor industry

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE MANUFACTURE;

CO-OPETITION; INTEL; OPEN INNOVATION; PATENTS; SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 77957979030     PISSN: 02675730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2010.035978     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ahuja, G., and Katila, R. (2001) 'Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study', Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 197-220.
2. Arora, A., Fosfuri, A. and Gambardella, A. (2001) Markets for Technology: Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Brandenburger, A. M. and Nalebuff, B. (1996) Co-opetition, Doubleday, New York.
4. Brandenburger, A. M. and Stuart, H. W. (1996) 'Value-based business strategy', Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 5-24.
5. Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A. and Pavitt, K. (2001) 'Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make?', Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 597-621.
6. Buderi, R. (1999) 'Into the big blue yonder', Technology Review, Vol. 102, No. 4, pp. 46-53.
7. Buderi, R. (2000) Engines of Tomorrow, Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.
8. Chandler, A. (1990) Scale and Scope, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Chesbrough, H. (1999) Intel Labs (A), Harvard Business School Case #9-600-032.
10. Chesbrough, H. (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
11. Chesbrough, H. (2006) 'Open innovation: a new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation', in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds.): Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1-12.
12. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (2006) Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Chesbrough, H. and Teece, D. J. (1996) 'When is virtual virtuous? Organizing for innovation', Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 65-71.
14. Christensen, J. F. (2006) 'Whither core competency for the large corporation in an open innovation world?', in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds.): Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 35-61.
15. Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D. (1990) 'Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation', Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 128-152.
16. Cockburn, I., Kortum, S. and Stern, S. (2002) 'Are all patent examiners equal? The impact of characteristics on patent statistics and litigation outcomes', NBER Working Paper 8980.
17. Cusumano, M. and Gawer, A. (2002) Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
18. Ferguson, C. H. and Morris, C. R. (1993) Computer Wars, Times Books, New York.
19. Gans, J. and Stern, S. (2003) 'The product market and the market for 'ideas': commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs', Research Policy, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 333-350.
20. Gartner Dataquest (2006) Market Share: Semiconductor Revenue, Worldwide, December.
21. Graham, S. J. H. and Mowery, D. (2006) 'The use of intellectual property in software: implications for open innovation', in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds.): Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 184-201.
22. Hall, B. H. and Ziedonis, R. H. (2001) 'The patent paradox revisited: determinants of patenting in the U. S. semiconductor industry, 1980-1994', RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 101-128.
23. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. (2005) 'Market value and patent citations', RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 36, pp. 16-38.
24. Henkel, J. (2006) 'Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux', Research Policy, Vol. 35, No. 7, pp. 953-969.
25. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M. and Henderson, R. (1993) 'Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations', Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 108, No. 3, pp. 577-98.
26. Langlois, R. N. (1992) 'External economies and economic progress: the case of the microcomputer industry', Business History Review, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 1-50.
27. Lazonick, W. (1990) Competitive Advantage on the Shop Floor, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
28. Lim, K. H. (2004) 'The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries (1981-97)', Research Policy, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 287-321.
29. Maula, M., Keil, T. and Salmenkaita, J. P. (2006) 'Open innovation in systemic innovation Contexts', in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds.): Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 241-257.
30. Moore, G. (1996) 'Some personal perspectives on research in the semiconductor industry', in Rosenbloom, R. and Spencer, W. (Eds.): Engines of Innovation, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, pp. 164-174.
31. O'Connor, G. C. (2006) 'Open, radical innovation: toward an integrated model in large established firms', in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds.): Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 62-81.
32. Porter, M. E. (1981) 'The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management', The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 609-620.
33. Rivette, K. G. and Kline, D. (2000) Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
34. Rosenberg, N. (1982) 'Learning by using', in Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 102-140.
35. Rosenberg, N. (1994) Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
36. Rosenkopf, L. and Almeida, P. (2003) 'Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility', Management Science, Vol. 49, pp. 751-766.
37. Ryall, M. D. and Sampson, R. C. (2009) 'Formal contracts in the presence of relational enforcement mechanisms: evidence from technology development contracts', Management Science, Vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 906-925.
38. Simard, C. and West, J. (2006) 'Knowledge networks and the geographic locus of innovation', in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds.): Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 220-240.
39. Simcoe, T. (2006) 'Open standards and intellectual property rights', in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds.): Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 161-183.
40. Teece, D. J. (1986) 'Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy', Research Policy, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 285-305.
41. Vanhaverbeke, W. (2006) 'The inter-organizational context of open innovation', in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds.): Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 205-219.
42. West, J. (2006) 'Does appropriability enable or retard open innovation?' in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds.): Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 109-133.
43. West, J. and Gallagher, S. (2006) 'Patterns of open innovation in open source software', in Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (Eds.): Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 82-108.