Short- and long-term costs of laparoscopic colectomy are significantly less than open colectomy

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 24, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2128-2134

  Eisenberg, David P ^a   Wey, Jane ^b   Bao, Philip Q ^a   Saul, Melissa ^a   Watson, Andrew R ^a   Schraut, Wolfgang H ^a   Lee, Kenneth K W ^a   James Moser, A ^a   Hughes, Steven J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Colorectal surgery; Cost; Health care costs; Laparoscopic surgery; Laparoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON ANASTOMOSIS; COLON RESECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HEART DISEASE; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FAILURE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

EID: 77957965132     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-0909-1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. MJ Solomon CJ Young AA Eyers RA Roberts 2002 Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse Br J Surg 89 35 39 1:STN:280:DC%2BD387hvVCntg%3D%3D 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01957.x 11851660 (Pubitemid 34031304)
2. M Braga A Vignali L Gianotti W Zuliani G Radaelli P Gruarin P Dellabona CV Di 2002 Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome Ann Surg 236 759 766 10.1097/00000658-200212000-00008 12454514 (Pubitemid 35403231)
3. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group 2004 A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer N Engl J Med 350 2050 2059 10.1056/NEJMoa032651 (Pubitemid 38596556)
4. PJ Guillou P Quirke H Thorpe J Walker DG Jayne AM Smith RM Heath JM Brown 2005 Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial Lancet 365 1718 1726 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2 15894098 (Pubitemid 40719107)
5. M Braga A Vignali W Zuliani M Frasson SC Di CV Di 2005 Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial Ann Surg 242 890 895 10.1097/01.sla.0000189573.23744.59 16327499 discussion (Pubitemid 41714067)
6. CP Delaney RP Kiran AJ Senagore K Brady VW Fazio 2003 Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery Ann Surg 238 67 72 10.1097/00000658-200307000-00009 12832967 (Pubitemid 38176409)
7. CP Delaney N Pokala AJ Senagore S Casillas RP Kiran KM Brady VW Fazio 2005 Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy Dis Colon Rectum 48 975 981 10.1007/s10350-004-0941-0 15793638 (Pubitemid 40884187)
8. HM Dowson A Huang Y Soon H Gage DP Lovell TA Rockall 2007 Systematic review of the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery Dis Colon Rectum 50 908 919 10.1007/s10350-007-0234-5 17468985 (Pubitemid 46870456)
9. HJ Duepree AJ Senagore CP Delaney KM Brady VW Fazio 2002 Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease Dis Colon Rectum 45 605 610 10.1007/s10350-004-6253-6 12004208 (Pubitemid 34507234)
10. M Janson I Bjorholt P Carlsson E Haglind M Henriksson E Lindholm B Anderberg 2004 Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer Br J Surg 91 409 417 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7lsVWgsw%3D%3D 10.1002/bjs.4469 15048739 (Pubitemid 38491108)
11. PM King JM Blazeby P Ewings PJ Franks RJ Longman AH Kendrick RM Kipling RH Kennedy 2006 Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme Br J Surg 93 300 308 1:STN:280:DC%2BD287ivVGrsw%3D%3D 10.1002/bjs.5216 16363014
12. KL Leung SP Kwok SC Lam JF Lee RY Yiu SS Ng PB Lai WY Lau 2004 Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial Lancet 363 1187 1192 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15947-3 15081650 (Pubitemid 38481844)
13. S Maartense MS Dunker JF Slors MA Cuesta DJ Gouma SJ van Deventer AA van Bodegraven WA Bemelman 2004 Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial Ann Surg 240 984 991 10.1097/01.sla.0000145923.03130.1c 15570204 (Pubitemid 39602126)
14. N Pokala CP Delaney AJ Senagore KM Brady VW Fazio 2005 Laparoscopic vs. open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study Surg Endosc 19 531 535 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MzhtF2htA%3D%3D 10.1007/s00464-004-8806-0 15759188 (Pubitemid 40897965)
15. G Salkeld M Bagia M Solomon 2004 Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy Br J Surg 91 1188 1191 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvnvFSluw%3D%3D 10.1002/bjs.4643 15449272 (Pubitemid 39179464)
16. AJ Senagore HJ Duepree CP Delaney S Dissanaike KM Brady VW Fazio 2002 Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences Dis Colon Rectum 45 485 490 10.1007/s10350-004-6225-x 12006930 (Pubitemid 34407726)
17. AJ Senagore A Brannigan RP Kiran K Brady CP Delaney 2005 Diagnosis-related group assignment in laparoscopic and open colectomy: financial implications for payer and provider Dis Colon Rectum 48 1016 1020 10.1007/s10350-004-0907-2 15785881 (Pubitemid 40884193)
18. G Shore QH Gonzalez A Bondora SM Vickers 2003 Laparoscopic vs. conventional ileocolectomy for primary Crohn disease Arch Surg 138 76 79 10.1001/archsurg.138.1.76 12511156
19. E Sokolovic P Buchmann F Schlomowitsch TD Szucs 2004 Comparison of resource utilization and long-term quality-of-life outcomes between laparoscopic and conventional colorectal surgery Surg Endosc 18 1663 1667 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrmtV2htA%3D%3D 15931492
20. TM Young-Fadok K HallLong EJ McConnell RG Gomez RL Cabanela 2001 Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn's disease. Improved outcomes and reduced costs Surg Endosc 15 450 454 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3M3mtl2gsg%3D%3D 10.1007/s004640080078 11353959 (Pubitemid 32448846)
21. MH Zheng B Feng AG Lu JW Li ML Wang ZH Mao YY Hu F Dong WG Hu DH Li L Zang YF Peng BM Yu 2005 Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma World J Gastroenterol 11 323 326 15637736
22. JK Vries B Marshalek JC D'Abarno RJ Yount LL Dunner 1992 An automated indexing system utilizing semantic net expansion Comput Biomed Res 25 153 167 1:STN:280:DyaK383lvVSisg%3D%3D 10.1016/0010-4809(92)90018-6 1582192
23. PJ Franks N Bosanquet H Thorpe JM Brown J Copeland AM Smith P Quirke PJ Guillou 2006 Short-term costs of conventional vs. laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial) Br J Cancer 95 6 12 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28zos1ymsQ%3D%3D 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603203 16755298 (Pubitemid 43980547)
24. EJ Hazebroek 2002 COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer Surg Endosc 16 949 953 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vgvFGmsQ%3D%3D 10.1007/s00464-001-8165-z 12163961 (Pubitemid 34592000)
25. RM Salloum DC Bulter SI Schwartz 2006 Economic evaluation of minimally invasive colectomy J Am Coll Surg 202 269 274 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.10.002 16427552 (Pubitemid 43112486)
26. HJ Duepree AJ Senagore CP Delaney VW Fazio 2003 Does means of access affect the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after bowel resection? Laparoscopy versus laparotomy J Am Coll Surg 197 177 181 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00232-1 12892794 (Pubitemid 36927379)
27. CP Delaney E Chang AJ Senagore M Broder 2008 Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database Ann Surg 247 819 824 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816d950e 18438119 (Pubitemid 351591517)