Integrated planning framework for urban river rehabilitation

Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

Volumn 136, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 688-696

  Deason, Jonathan P ^a   Dickey, G Edward ^b   Kinnell, Jason C ^c   Shabman, Leonard A ^d  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND   (United States)

^c Veritas Economic Consulting   (United States)

^d RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Environmental planning; Environmental Protection Agency; Rehabilitation; Rivers; Sediment; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Urban areas; Watersheds

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE PLANNING; COLLABORATIVE PROCESS; COSTS AND BENEFITS; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; FEDERAL AGENCY; INTEGRATED PLANNING; MEMORANDA OF UNDERSTANDING; PLANNING FRAMEWORK; POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS; REHABILITATION; SHARED UNDERSTANDING; U.S. ARMY; U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; URBAN AREAS; URBAN RIVER;

ENGINEERS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; LANDFORMS; RESTORATION; RIVERS; SEDIMENTOLOGY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WATERSHEDS;

REGIONAL PLANNING;

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INTEGRATED APPROACH; RIVER WATER; STAKEHOLDER; URBAN AREA; WATER PLANNING; WATERSHED;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 77957959663     PISSN: 07339496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000076     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bauer M.R. Randolph J. Characteristics of collaborative environmental planning and decisionmaking processes. Environ. Pract. 2000, 2(2):156-165. 10.1017/S146604660000137X, 1466-0466
2. Bingham G. Resolving environmental disputes: decade of experience 1986, The Conservation Foundation, Naperville, Ill.
3. Bingham M.F. Mathews K.E. Morton A.R. Woodard D.M. Abrams E.S. Li Z. Economic and social analysis of the Boardman River dams: Quantification of existing conditions. Prepared for Boardman River Dams Committee 2008, and Veritas Economic Consulting, Cary, N.C.
4. Decision making for the environment: Social and behavioral science research priorities 2005, Brewer, G. D Stern, P. C and eds. National Research Council of the National Academies, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
5. Bush G.W. Executive order on facilitation of cooperative conservation. 2009, 〈〉 (July 13, ).
6. Deason J.P. Natural resource trustee partnering in the urban river restoration initiative. Fed. Facil. Environ. J. 2004, 14(4):45-59. 10.1002/ffej.10093, 1048-4078.
7. Boardman River Feasibility Study: Detailed analysis of alternatives report. 2009, Environmental Consulting and Technology, Inc. (ECT), Prepared for Boardman River Dams Committee, 〈〉 (Nov. 30, ).
8. Koontz T.M. Collaborative environmental management: What roles for government? 2004, Resources for the Future Press, Washington, D.C.
9. Kopp R.J. Smith V.K. Valuing natural assets: The economics of natural resource damage assessment 1993, and Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
10. Ludwig D.F. Iannuzzi T.J. Habitat equivalency in urban estuaries: an analytical hierarchy process for planning ecological restoration. Urban Ecosyst. 2006, 9(4):265-290. URECFW, 1083-8155, 10.1007/s11252-006-0007-2
11. Maguire L.A. Interplay of science and stakeholder values in Neuse River total maximum daily load process. J. Water Res. 2003, 129:4261-4270.
12. Understanding risk: Informing decisions in democratic society 1996, National Research Council, P. C. Stern, H. V. Fineberg, and eds National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
13. US Army Corps of Engineers water resources planning: new opportunity for service 2004, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
14. Noble C.V. Martel D.J. Wakeley J.S. national survey of potential wetland hydrology regional indicators (ERDC TN-WRAP-05-01) 2005, and U.S. Army Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Miss.
15. The promise and performance of environmental conflict resolution 2003, O'Leary, R Bingham, L. B and eds. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, D.C.
16. Obama B. Executive order: Chesapeake Bay protection and restoration. 2009, 〈〉 (July 2, 2009).
17. Executive office of the president. 2005, Office of Management and Budget, Circular A-94 revised (transmittal memo No. 64), 〈〉 (April ).
18. Renn O. A model for an analytic-deliberative process in risk management. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33(18):3049-3055. ESTHAG, 0013-936X, 10.1021/es981283m.
19. Shabman L. Stephenson K. Environmental valuation and its economic critics. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 2000, 126(6):382-388. JWRMD5, 0733-9496, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2000)126:6(382)
20. Stephenson K. Shabman L. Overview of computer aided dispute resolution: approach and evaluation. Computer Aided Dispute Resolution: Proc CADRe Workshop 2009, K. Stephenson, L. Shabman, S. Langsdale, H. Cardwell, and and eds. IWR Rep.07-R-6, Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 〈〉 (July 2, ).
21. Stern P.C. Deliberative methods for understanding environmental systems. BioScience 2005, 55(11):976-982. BISNAS, 0006-3568, 10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0976:DMFUES]2.0.CO;2.
22. Susskind L. McKearnan S. Thomas-Larmer J. The consensus building handbook: comprehensive guide to reaching agreements 1999, and Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks, Calif.
23. 2005, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources, Planning manual, IWR Rep. No.96-R-21, 〈〉 (May ).
24. National oil and hazardous substances pollution contingency plan 1968, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
25. Two federal agencies sign watershed management agreement. 2006, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 〈〉 (June ).
26. Contaminated sediment remediation guidance for hazardous waste sites. 2006, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 〈〉 (June ).
27. EPA can better implement its strategy for management contaminated sediments. 2006, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ( Rep. No.2006-P-00016, EPA Office of the Inspector General, Washington, D.C.
28. Memorandum of understanding between the US Environmental Protection Agency and US Department of the Army, Subject: Restoration of degraded urban rivers. 2006, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 〈〉 (June ).
29. Urban rivers restoration initiative. 2006, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 〈〉 (June ).
30. Memorandum of understanding between the US Environmental Protection Agency and US Department of the Army, subject: Restoration of degraded urban rivers. 2005, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, August.
31. Memorandum of understanding between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (Office of Water/Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response) and U.S. Department of the Army, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), subject: Restoration of degraded urban rivers. 2009, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 〈〉 (June 30, ).
32. Habitat Evaluation Procedures (87FW1). Population and habitat evaluation methods series, part 870: Habitat assessment 1996, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Habitat Conservation, Washington, D.C.
33. Transportation and infrastructure committee resolution, docket 2628: Passaic River, environmental restoration. 2000, U.S. House of Representatives, April 11.
34. Economic and environmental principles and guidelines for water and related land resources implementation studies (March 10, 1983) 1983, U.S. Water Resources Council, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
35. Vining R. On appraising the performance of an economic system 1984, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
36. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management 2000, Wondolleck and Yaffee, Island Press, Washington, D.C.