Health state preferences and decision-making after malignant middle cerebral artery infarctions

Neurology

Volumn 75, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 682-687

  Kelly, Adam G ^a   Robert G Holloway, ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEREBRAL ARTERY DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRANIECTOMY; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; RANKIN SCALE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CRANIOTOMY; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH SURVEY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; CRANIOTOMY; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; INFARCTION, MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957958735     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: 1526632X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181eee273     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De Georgia M, von Kummer R. Malignant middle cerebral artery territory infarction: clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol 1996;53:309-315.
2. Gupta R, Connolly ES, Mayer S, Elkind MS. Hemicraniectomy for massive middle cerebral artery territory infarction: a systematic review. Stroke 2004;35:539-543.
3. Vahedi K, Vicaut E, Mateo J, et al, on behalf of the DECIMAL Investigators. Sequential-design, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of early decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (DECIMAL). Stroke 2007;38:2506-2517.
4. Juettler E, Schwab S, Schmiedek P, et al, for the DESTINY Study Group. Decompressive surgery for the treatment of malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery (DESTINY): a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2007;38:2518-2525. (Pubitemid 47329631)
5. Hofmeijer J, Kappelle LJ, Algra A, Amelink GJ, van Gijn J, van der Worp HB, for the HAMLET investigators. Surgical decompression for space-occupying cerebral infarction (the Hemicraniectomy after Middle Cerebral Artery infarction with Life-threatening Edema Trial [HAMLET]): a multicentre, open, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:326-333.
6. Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, et al, for the DECIMAL, DESTINY, and HAMLET investigators. Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomized controlled trials. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:215-222. (Pubitemid 46237760)
7. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604-607.
8. Goel V. Decision analysis: applications and limitations. Can Med Assoc J 1992;147:413-417.
9. Weinstein MC, O'Brien B, Hornberger J, et al. Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in healthcare evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices-Modeling Studies. Value Health 2003;6:9-17.
10. Post PN, Stiggelbout AM, Wakker PP. The utility of health states after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke 2001;32:1425-1429.
11. Boyd NF, Sutherland HJ, Heasman KZ, Tritchler DL, Cummings BJ. Whose utilities for decision analysis? Med Decis Making 1990;10:58-67.
12. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Tyler D, Perera S, Reker DM, Studenski S. Evaluation of proxy responses to the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke 2002;33:2593-2599. (Pubitemid 35266429)
13. Shalowitz AB, Garrett-Mayer E, Wendler D. The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:493-497.
14. Holloway RG, Benesch CG, Burgin WS, Zentner JB. Prognosis and decision making in severe stroke. JAMA 2005;294:725-733.
15. O'Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB. Modifying unwarranted decisions in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health Aff 2004; (suppl Web exclusives):VAR63-72.
16. New PW, Buchbinder R. Critical appraisal and review of the Rankin Scale and its derivatives. Neuroepidemiology 2006;26:4-15.
17. Foerch C, Lang JM, Krause J, et al. Functional impairment, disability, and quality of life outcome after decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. J Neurosurg 2004;101:248-254.
18. Leonhardt G, Wilhelm H, Doerfler A, et al. Clinical outcome and neuropsychological deficits after right decompressive hemicraniectomy in MCA infarction. J Neurol 2002;249:1433-1440.
19. Vahedi K, Benoist L, Kurtz A, et al. Quality of life after decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1181-1184.
20. Erban P, Woertgen C, Luerding R, Bogdahn U, Schlachetzki F, Horn M. Long-term outcome after hemicraniectomy for space occupying right hemispheric MCA infarction. Clin Neurol Neerosurg 2006;108:384-387.
21. Pillai A, Menon SK, Kumar S, Rajeev K, Kumar A, Panikar D. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: an analysis of long-term outcome and factors in patient selection. J Neurosurg 2007;106:59-65.
22. Benejam B, Sahuquillo J, Poca MA, et al. Quality of life and neurobehavioral changes in survivors of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. J Neurol 2009;256:1126-1133.